Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
] It could be better described, yes. My understanding of /usr/share as
] architecture-independent (and read-only, as the description
] continues) is that /usr/share/can potentially be mounted read-only
] for multiple machines of different architectures.
Ok, I
[Sebastian Kuzminsky]
Before 0.10, the upstream installed both the binaries (actually shell
scripts) and the shell libraries in /usr/bin. Starting with 0.10,
the shell libraries are moved to /usr/lib/cogito.
Correct, except that it should be /usr/share/cogito/.
Thanks for packaging this.
su, 2005-05-08 kello 22:15 -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky kirjoitti:
The only lintian/linda complaints are from missing manpages. Some
upstream folks are working on translating the existing docs from .txt
to manpages (actually asciidoc), so it'll hopefully get cleaner soon
without me lifting a
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
] [Sebastian Kuzminsky]
] Before 0.10, the upstream installed both the binaries (actually shell
] scripts) and the shell libraries in /usr/bin. Starting with 0.10,
] the shell libraries are moved to /usr/lib/cogito.
]
] Correct, except that it should
On 09-May-2005, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
] [Sebastian Kuzminsky]
] the shell libraries are moved to /usr/lib/cogito.
] Correct, except that it should be /usr/share/cogito/.
The FHS describes /usr/share as architecture-independent data, and
gives
Get it here:
http://highlab.com/~seb/debian
Before 0.10, the upstream installed both the binaries (actually shell
scripts) and the shell libraries in /usr/bin. Starting with 0.10, the
shell libraries are moved to /usr/lib/cogito. This seems to me like a
fine thing to do, any reason Debian
6 matches
Mail list logo
