Hi,
Le 10/05/2014 09:23, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
I believe it violates DFSG to ship e.g. JFIF or GIF files which contains
copyright-protected but not freely licensed ICC profiles.
Thanks for raising the issue. Since I (co)maintain a few web related
packages, I started submitting issues
On Mon, 12 May 2014, James Cloos wrote:
Note that you cannot just strip colour profiles from image containers.
Doing so changes the output.
You'd have to replace the profile with a Free equivilent. Or, if no
free equivilent is available, edit the image to match a Free profile.
Can you
Hi,
Le 13/05/2014 05:34, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
On Mon, 12 May 2014, James Cloos wrote:
Note that you cannot just strip colour profiles from image containers.
Doing so changes the output.
You'd have to replace the profile with a Free equivilent. Or, if no
free equivilent is
Quoting David Prévot (2014-05-13 12:00:40)
Le 13/05/2014 05:34, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
Also, where is a Free profile? ISTR that PDF/{A,X} creation requires
a profile too; I’ve used one that came as example somewhere
currently.
The icc-profiles-free package is in main.
ghostscript also
JS == Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk writes:
JS I believe it does not violate DFSG to ship e.g. JFIF or GIF files
JS which was upstream distributed with copyright-protected but not
JS freely licensed ICC profiles, if repackaged to strip those ICC
JS profiles.
Note that you cannot just strip
Le 12 mai 2014 17:51, James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com a écrit :
JS == Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk writes:
JS I believe it does not violate DFSG to ship e.g. JFIF or GIF files
JS which was upstream distributed with copyright-protected but not
JS freely licensed ICC profiles, if repackaged
At Sun, 11 May 2014 19:04:07 -0400,
David Prévot wrote:
Q. Are profiles copyrighted?
A. ICC has no formal position on the use of profiles. It is really up to
the software vendor. However, since the software vendor effectively
holds copyright on the profile (which is specified in a tag) the
Quoting James Cloos (2014-05-12 17:48:53)
JS == Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk writes:
JS I believe it does not violate DFSG to ship e.g. JFIF or GIF files
JS which was upstream distributed with copyright-protected but not
JS freely licensed ICC profiles, if repackaged to strip those ICC
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Hi,
Jonas Smedegaard brought to my attention that an image file [0]
can embed a copyrighted ICC profile without license.
Note that lintian detect these naked (not embeded) profile by default.
Since it's something that not
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES
roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Hi,
Jonas Smedegaard brought to my attention that an image file [0]
can embed a copyrighted ICC profile without license.
Note that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le samedi 10 mai 2014 à 13:37 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
This sounds like a ludicrous overreach of copyright. Isn't an ICC
descriptive, rather than creative?
According to the International Color Consortium, profiles provide
content
Hi,
Jonas Smedegaard brought to my attention that an image file [0]
can embed a copyrighted ICC profile without license.
Since it's something that not many people seems to be aware of,
maybe it might be useful to have a lintian check for that.
That command [1] shows positives on my /usr/share/
On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 11:10 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Hi,
Jonas Smedegaard brought to my attention that an image file [0]
can embed a copyrighted ICC profile without license.
[...]
This sounds like a ludicrous overreach of copyright. Isn't an ICC
descriptive, rather than creative? And the
Le samedi 10 mai 2014 à 13:37 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 11:10 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Hi,
Jonas Smedegaard brought to my attention that an image file [0]
can embed a copyrighted ICC profile without license.
[...]
This sounds like a ludicrous overreach of
Quoting Ben Hutchings (2014-05-10 14:37:35)
On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 11:10 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Jonas Smedegaard brought to my attention that an image file [0] can
embed a copyrighted ICC profile without license.
[...]
This sounds like a ludicrous overreach of copyright. Isn't an ICC
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 02:55:09PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Le samedi 10 mai 2014 à 13:37 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 11:10 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Hi,
Jonas Smedegaard brought to my attention that an image file [0]
can embed a copyrighted ICC profile without
16 matches
Mail list logo
