On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:55:36PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
Thanks to base64, I never forward any windows virus to myself, they
are kept in my ~/mail directory. See my ~/pmrc/executables in master
for generic anti windows-executable recipes.
I recently found this other source of procmail
I am trying to switch to procmail on master, which involves putting
a proper ~/.procmailrc in place and nothing else.
However, a major problem arises due to spam. My last rule forwards
remaining mails to my normal email address, using the standard mail
forwarding syntax:
:0
! [EMAIL
On Sat, 7 May 2005, martin f krafft wrote:
I am trying to switch to procmail on master, which involves putting
a proper ~/.procmailrc in place and nothing else.
However, a major problem arises due to spam. My last rule forwards
remaining mails to my normal email address, using the standard
also sprach Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.07.1403 +0200]:
Why are you so much worried about the envelope sender, when it is
usually forged? You are not trying to bounce messages that you
didn't want to receive back to the sender, are you? (that would be
bounce-spam).
Well, sure.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.07.1403 +0200]:
Why are you so much worried about the envelope sender, when it is
usually forged? You are not trying to bounce messages that you
didn't want to receive
On Sat, 7 May 2005, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.07.1403 +0200]:
Why are you so much worried about the envelope sender, when it is
usually forged? You are not trying to bounce messages that you
didn't want to receive back to the sender, are
also sprach Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.07.1506 +0200]:
You should really accept messages from master before trying to
reject spam, i.e. use some kind of whitelist for master. If that's
not possible, don't forward email to such address.
The stuff my mail server rejects is 100%
also sprach Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.07.1451 +0200]:
Why not configure your mailserver to just /dev/null spam/viruses
that originate from your debian.org address.
You could put this in your .procmailrc:
:0
|/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f'' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.. then
:0
|/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f'' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
procmail: Executing /usr/sbin/sendmail,-f'',[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exim: '' - bad address: malformed address: ' may not follow '
It seems to work without quotes though.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`.
On Sat, 7 May 2005, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.07.1506 +0200]:
You should really accept messages from master before trying to
reject spam, i.e. use some kind of whitelist for master. If that's
not possible, don't forward email to such
also sprach Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.07.1555 +0200]:
Why bother to forward those messages to your mail server at all?
The same base64 string you are using in postfix's body_checks will
surely serve in your .procmailrc in master.
Because master is not the only machine that
11 matches
Mail list logo
