So there's some positive response. Where is a good place to pursue this
further? Is this a debian policy change?
I think there's no need for a Debian policy change to start.
You should start by finding a proper way to put the recommendation and
suggestion explanations in package control
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:03:50PM -0400, Felipe Sateler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 07:02:02PM -0400, Felipe Sateler a écrit :
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Could they be added as XB-Comment:? I use XS-Comment and it appears in the
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 18:34, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:57:24PM +0100, Adeodato Simó
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
* Shachar Or [Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:36:35 +0300]:
I am not suggesting this data will be put in with the package's
description,
Why not? I
* Daniel Burrows [Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:34:18 -0700]:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:57:24PM +0100, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
* Shachar Or [Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:36:35 +0300]:
I am not suggesting this data will be put in with the package's
description,
Why not? I
Le Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 07:02:02PM -0400, Felipe Sateler a écrit :
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Could they be added as XB-Comment:? I use XS-Comment and it appears in the
dsc,
I don't know if XB-* appear in the deb or elsewhere.
Hi Felipe,
The answer is only in the sources for the moment.
Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 07:02:02PM -0400, Felipe Sateler a écrit :
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Could they be added as XB-Comment:? I use XS-Comment and it appears in the
dsc, I don't know if XB-* appear in the deb or elsewhere.
Hi Felipe,
The answer is only in
On Tuesday 12 August 2008 22:57, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Shachar Or [Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:36:35 +0300]:
I am not suggesting this data will be put in with the package's
description,
Why not? I think (briefly) explaining some of the most relevant
recommends and suggests is a perfect use of the
Le Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 06:36:35PM +0300, Shachar Or a écrit :
What I am offering is the idea that package dependencies that are
reccomendations or suggestions must be explained.
Hi,
Before I read your mail, I thought that it was not possible, but after
googling a bit, I found out that dpkg
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 06:36:35PM +0300, Shachar Or a écrit :
What I am offering is the idea that package dependencies that are
reccomendations or suggestions must be explained.
Hi,
Before I read your mail, I thought that it was not possible,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 06:36:35PM +0300, Shachar Or a écrit :
What I am offering is the idea that package dependencies that are
reccomendations or suggestions must be explained.
Hi,
Before I read your mail, I
Hi.
I'd like to propose a feature for the package management system;
What I am offering is the idea that package dependencies that are
reccomendations or suggestions must be explained.
Many times I can't guess the reason a package is being recommended/suggested
and in times that I can guess I
11 matches
Mail list logo
