Re: ftpmaster review reply Re: Comments regarding chroma_1.18-1_multi.changes

2021-03-02 Thread Ian Jackson
Sean Whitton writes ("Re: ftpmaster review reply Re: Comments regarding chroma_1.18-1_multi.changes"): > It would be disingenuous to claim that as a result of this single perl > script, the whole chroma /package/ "requires software outside of main to > function". So

Re: ftpmaster review reply Re: Comments regarding chroma_1.18-1_multi.changes

2021-02-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 02:39:11PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: >... > Firstly, it's worth noting that when it comes to the requirements for the > archive areas main/contrib/non-free, the distinction between source and > binary packages is not relevant. >... Wrong, see [1]. > Sean Whitton cu

Re: ftpmaster review reply Re: Comments regarding chroma_1.18-1_multi.changes

2021-02-25 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Thu 25 Feb 2021 at 09:02PM GMT, Ian Jackson wrote: > Firstly, everything in that directory is completely DFSG-free in > itself. Right, which is why we're discussing contrib, not non-free. > Secondly, almost all of its contents are input files and scripts which > are actually used by

ftpmaster review reply Re: Comments regarding chroma_1.18-1_multi.changes

2021-02-25 Thread Ian Jackson
Hi. Thanks for looking at this package. Because I believe in Debian's value of transparency I decided to CC this reply to a public list. I didn't think there was a better list than -devel. Readers of -devel will find references etc. below [1]. Sean Whitton writes ("Comments regarding