Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-15 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We should count ourselves lucky that we don't have stable releases using each of the GCC 2.9x, 3.0, and 3.1 ABIs. Does anyone have thoughts on a Debian-wide migration towards GCC 3.2? (Or, for that matter, towards *anything* in the 3.x line). g++

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-15 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:12:41 -0500, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: Does anyone have thoughts on a Debian-wide migration towards GCC 3.2? (Or, for that matter, towards *anything* in the 3.x line). The upcoming ABI change from 3.1 to 3.2 is the reason we've not switched to 3.1 as the

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-14 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi Nikita, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: Hello. I wanted to install g++ 3.2 (instead of 3.1 that is buggy) on our server running woody with several packages from unstable. I noticed that g++ 3.2 depends on recent libc6. Is it safe to install libc6 from unstable now? Are libdb problems resolved?

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-14 Thread Joseph Carter
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:57:24AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: Please note that the C++ ABI has been changed with gcc 3.2. The old libraries compiled with g++ 3.0.x or 3.1.x can't be used with 3.2 anymore. Again? *sigh* Apparently their C++ ABI stability goes about as far as my vision. (For

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-14 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 22:06:12 -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:57:24AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: Please note that the C++ ABI has been changed with gcc 3.2. Again? *sigh* The main point of the GCC 3.2 release is to have a relatively stable and common C++ ABI for

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-14 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 22:06:12 -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:57:24AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: Please note that the C++ ABI has been changed with gcc 3.2.

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-14 Thread mdew
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 02:00, Daniel Burrows wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 22:06:12 -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:57:24AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: Please note

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:00:35AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 22:06:12 -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:57:24AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-14 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:00:35AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: The main point of the GCC 3.2 release is to have a relatively stable and common C++ ABI for GNU/Linux and BSD usage.

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-14 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Wed, Aug 14, 2002, à 10:15:17AM -0400, Michael Stone a écrit: On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:00:35AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: The main point of the GCC 3.2 release is to have a relatively

g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-12 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello. I wanted to install g++ 3.2 (instead of 3.1 that is buggy) on our server running woody with several packages from unstable. I noticed that g++ 3.2 depends on recent libc6. Is it safe to install libc6 from unstable now? Are libdb problems resolved?