I can confirm this, this is really annoying.
Switching between tabs is really slowly, htop shows 100% cpu usage
(/usr/bin/X) for 2-5 sec between the tab change.
Debian : Testing
Kernel : 2.6.38-2-amd64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 643712 gnome
Bug #643712 [general] general: GNOME or GTK tabs are very slow
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'gnome'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
643712: http://bugs.debian.org
Package: general
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
For the last two days any GNOME or GTK program that I run that has tabs (e.g.
gedit, nautilus, Iceweasel etc) have become very slow to open new tabs, switch
between tabs or close tabs. Nautilus and Iceweasel work with no slow down at
all
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
I'm working on it. But even if I get it to compile with Debian
sources, we still would need another soname for this.
I was going to respond to your earlier message(s), but I see you're
ahead of me. Ok, for now, I'm just going to assume that you will work
this all out
care
I hope I don't care; I'll probably also rename the package and make it
conflict with gtkmm just as a quick hack so I don't break my own
system. I'll be anxiously awaiting a more official and reliable
solution, however. :-)
more reliable --- hope so :) The release schedules of gtk+, gnome
versioning on Gtk-- to allow this.
Hello,
first let me thank you for pointing this out. After my initial confusion
I think I see the issue now. We have the following situation:
a) Gtk-- 0.9.x does work with Gtk 1.0. No gnome-- support.
b) Gtk-- 0.9.x may work with Gtk 1.1 (debian package
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 03:28:27PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
'Bout what I figured, but wouldn't it be possible to produce two
versions which conflict? Not a perfect solution, but it would make it
possible for people like me who want to work on gnome-related gtk--
stuff to do so
Chris == Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chris Perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't see any way of
Chris using gtk-- with gnome at the moment. I was going to try
Chris packaging gnome-hack (for my own use -- I'd want to check
Chris with the nethack maintainer before
, but it would make it
possible for people like me who want to work on gnome-related gtk--
stuff to do so. The conflicts could be cleaned up when someone had the
time to hack on it (presumably post-slink).
I sthere any reason why I can't build gtk-- libraries with gnome support? Do
we need two versions
it
possible for people like me who want to work on gnome-related gtk--
stuff to do so. The conflicts could be cleaned up when someone had the
time to hack on it (presumably post-slink).
Just a thought -- I'm about to try building my own personal gnome-gtkmm
package (which will conflict
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
Mmmh. I just checked. The reason why gtk-- is currently w/o gnome support
is, because I never installed libgnome-dev I think. I'm just doing it now
and will recompile gtk-- (or better: I'll try to compile gtk-- 0.9.17) with
gnome support.
Any
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 04:45:35PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
Gnome support requires Gtk 1.1 from CVS, so if you want a 1.0-based
version you have to build it separately from the Gnome version.
Mmmh. I mailed to the gtk-- mailing list
Perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't see any way of using gtk--
with gnome at the moment. I was going to try packaging gnome-hack (for
my own use -- I'd want to check with the nethack maintainer before doing
anything more with it), but it seems to require gtk-- and gtk1.1, and
the two don't
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
anything more with it), but it seems to require gtk-- and gtk1.1, and
the two don't seem to work together at this point.
I think it would really be nice to get a gnome-supporting version of
gtk-- in before the slink freeze. Is anyone working on
be built with either Gtk 1.0 or Gtk 1.1, if you
install both things would get, uh, confused.
'Bout what I figured, but wouldn't it be possible to produce two
versions which conflict? Not a perfect solution, but it would make it
possible for people like me who want to work on gnome-related gtk--
stuff
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
'Bout what I figured, but wouldn't it be possible to produce two
versions which conflict? Not a perfect solution, but it would make it
possible for people like me who want to work on gnome-related gtk--
stuff to do so. The conflicts could
16 matches
Mail list logo
