On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 10:35:40AM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
There might be bug in either Pine or IMAP(D) or both.
There is. The license. (See debian-legal.)
--
G. Branden Robinson |A committee is a life form with six or
Debian GNU/Linux|more legs
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, +00:52:25 EEST (UTC +0300),
Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn [EMAIL PROTECTED] pressed these keys:
Package: imap
Version: 4.7c-1
(Juhapekka Tolvanen's messages may be found on these mailing lists:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-legal@lists.debian.org)
Man, you got
Sorry I couldn't answer yout letters earlier. I had to repair my mailbox.
I also had to involve and help the system administrators to go through all
the IMAP mailboxes and filter out all the messages with suspect headers.
Looks better now, thanks.
I don't know much about the IMAP intrinsics,
On Thu 31 Aug 2000, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
caused the daemon (or the client) screw up the magic. I ended up with a
magic message looking like this:
,-
| From MAILER-DAEMON Wed Aug 30 16:36:48 2000
| Date: 30 Aug 2000 16:36:48 +0200
| From: Mail System Internal Data [EMAIL
Package: imap
Version: 4.7c-1
Severity: important
On Thu 31 Aug 2000, Paul Slootman wrote:
Yuck. Smells like a serious buffer overflow somewhere.
Upon a quick glance, there indeed appears to be no checks at all
for buffer overflows. A buf of 8k is allocated into which the
From:, Status:,
Package: imap
Version: 4.7c-1
Severity: important
On Thu 31 Aug 2000, Paul Slootman wrote:
Yuck. Smells like a serious buffer overflow somewhere.
Upon a quick glance, there indeed appears to be no checks at all
for buffer overflows. A buf of 8k is allocated into which the
From:,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 07:32:17AM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote:
commands. So having extremely long X-Keywords in mail messages
will screw things up. Double yuck.
This is in imap-4.7c/src/osdep/unix/unix.c BTW.
See the original message and the accompanying thread in debian-devel,
At 08:21 AM 8/31/00 -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
There might be bug in either Pine or IMAP(D) or both.
Both... I had to manually delete several messages in Pine 4.21 folders
and I don't use IMAP
I don't use pine or imap, but the school hosting my
[Please Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] on any replies to this thread.]
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Buddha Buck wrote:
I don't use pine or imap, but the school hosting my mailbox uses imap.
The behavior I saw:
Using POP to copy new mail to my workstation at work (running Eudora)
seemed to cause ipop3d to
[Please Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] on any replies to this thread.]
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Richard A Nelson wrote:
There might be bug in either Pine or IMAP(D) or both.
Both... I had to manually delete several messages in Pine 4.21 folders
and I don't use IMAP
Pine also uses libc-client which is
Funny side effect of the bug, here is the new magic message in my
mailbox :-)
Check out the X-IMAP: entry:
,-
| From MAILER-DAEMON Thu Aug 31 17:15:15 2000
| Date: 31 Aug 2000 17:15:15 +0200
| From: Mail System Internal Data [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Thu 31 Aug 2000, Paul Slootman wrote:
Yuck. Smells like a serious buffer overflow somewhere.
Upon a quick glance, there indeed appears to be no checks at all
for buffer overflows. A buf of 8k is allocated into which the
From:, Status:,
Package: imap
Version: 4.7c-1
(Juhapekka Tolvanen's messages may be found on these mailing lists:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-legal@lists.debian.org)
Man, you got great headers on your messages!
I don't know if it was your intension, but you managed to totally screw
up
my inbox (no
I had the same problem...I had to manually edit the messages after
reading them.
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
Package: imap
Version: 4.7c-1
(Juhapekka Tolvanen's messages may be found on these mailing lists:
14 matches
Mail list logo
