Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-11 Thread Roland Bauerschmidt
Joey Hess wrote: Still doesn't work for me. What IMAP server are you using? courier-imap-ssl. Roland -- Roland Bauerschmidt

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-11 Thread Joey Hess
Roland Bauerschmidt wrote: Joey Hess wrote: Still doesn't work for me. What IMAP server are you using? courier-imap-ssl. I guess that's the difference. The wu imapd, which I am using, tickles other isync bugs too. I should figure out how to get courier to work. -- see shy jo

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-10 Thread Joey Hess
Roland Bauerschmidt wrote: It's supposed to have support for uploading local messages now, but I have never seen it work yet. It actually works here! When I first tried isync (version 0.4) I was dissatisfied because this wasn't working. I wrote Michael Elkins about it, but never got a

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-07 Thread Brian May
GOTO == GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: GOTO wanderlust (package: wl) ? It is also slow but it has nice GOTO feature including mail caching and imap disconnect mode. Looks Interesting. I even found documentation in English! It seems to be a good mail reader, but I am having

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-07 Thread Tommi Virtanen
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - delete message on client = gets transfered again on next download. Not if you can set up your mail client properly. If using mutt, set maildir_trash. I typed in rm Maildir/cur/* and all messages were copied over again from scratch. Nothing was

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-07 Thread Craig Sanders
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:43:09AM +1000, Brian May wrote: Despite these problems, Gnus is the only program I have seen that will highlight replies to my mail, something I find very valuable in large mailing lists like this one. btw, mutt will do that. it highlights messages sent by or to you.

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-06 Thread Roland Bauerschmidt
Joey Hess wrote: - create message on client = gets ignored by isync. It's supposed to have support for uploading local messages now, but I have never seen it work yet. It actually works here! When I first tried isync (version 0.4) I was dissatisfied because this wasn't working. I wrote

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-05 Thread Brian Nelson
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Colin == Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Colin Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In my search for a perfect offline IMAP client(TM) I have looked at isync vs mailsync. Colin What's wrong with Gnus? Perhaps with the Agent

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-05 Thread GOTO Masanori
At 05 Sep 2001 09:43:09 +1000, Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Colin Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In my search for a perfect offline IMAP client(TM) I have looked at isync vs mailsync. Colin What's wrong with Gnus? Perhaps with the Agent? I admit Colin I've

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-05 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Despite these problems, Gnus is the only program I have seen that will highlight replies to my mail, something I find very valuable in large mailing lists like this one. color index red black ~t [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ~x scrooge.chocbit.org.au or

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-05 Thread Brian May
Marcelo == Marcelo E Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Despite these problems, Gnus is the only program I have seen that will highlight replies to my mail, something I find very valuable in large mailing lists like this one. Marcelo

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-04 Thread Colin Walters
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In my search for a perfect offline IMAP client(TM) I have looked at isync vs mailsync. What's wrong with Gnus? Perhaps with the Agent? I admit I've never tried disconnected IMAP with it, but I see people talking about it on the ding lists.

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-04 Thread T.Pospisek's MailLists
On 4 Sep 2001, Brian May wrote: [...] MAILSYNC Has been in use here for 9 months without a flaw... PROS: [...] - can delete deleted messages (not tested). ...this feature works here. - can create and delete folders (not tested). Dito. [...] CONS: - upstream author seems to be

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-04 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Brian May wrote: ISYNC: CONS - delete message on client = gets transfered again on next download. If I remember correctly that is not true if you use mutt to mark it as deleted but don't physically delete it. isync should then do the right thing on sync and delete it at both

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-04 Thread Joey Hess
Brian May wrote: In my search for a perfect offline IMAP client(TM) I have looked at isync vs mailsync. Me too, I have settled on isync for now although it's less than perfect. - supports reliably synchronisation of message flags, such as read, and previously read, important

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-04 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On 4 Sep 2001, Brian May wrote: MAILSYNC PROS: - supports bidirectional transfer of messages. - can delete deleted messages (not tested). I can confirm this works. - can create and delete folders (not tested). And this. - could potentially support other services too, such as

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-04 Thread Brian May
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 12:51:51PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: - delete message on client = gets transfered again on next download. Not if you can set up your mail client properly. If using mutt, set maildir_trash. I typed in rm Maildir/cur/* and all messages were copied over again from

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-04 Thread Brian May
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 02:33:47PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: Did you use the verbose option to see which imap commands are being sent? Depending on that it could either be a c-client or mutt problem. Good point. What are the flags, and what do they mean? I can only assume (from verbose

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-04 Thread Brian May
Colin == Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Colin Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In my search for a perfect offline IMAP client(TM) I have looked at isync vs mailsync. Colin What's wrong with Gnus? Perhaps with the Agent? I admit Colin I've never tried

isync vs mailsync

2001-09-03 Thread Brian May
Hello, In my search for a perfect offline IMAP client(TM) I have looked at isync vs mailsync. Which one is better? Why is one better then the other? I have found that in fact both have limitations, so will describe the pros and cons here, in case in can help anybody else. I will not comment