hi,
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 06:24:44PM +0100, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
Today, Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-) Or, during a short period (say, 2 months or so?) both fields could
be there, and icq should really be dropped.
Or, they could both be there (if space permits) with the ICQ
[Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about dropping icq field]
Jason said he won't decide - I really understand that. But maybe if
some of the other 113 people that are currently using the icq field (or
also others, that might use the jabber field) could comment on this it
would be
Hi!
I was just wondering - there is this icq-field on
http://db.debian.org/, which I have to say I'm not really happy with.
It's not the kind of thing that seems the right thing[tm] for Debian. I
would rather like to have a jabber field instead of that
jabber, you might ask? From
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 08:44:38AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
I was just wondering - there is this icq-field on
http://db.debian.org/, which I have to say I'm not really happy with.
It's not the kind of thing that seems the right thing[tm] for Debian. I
would rather like to have a jabber
Today, Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-) Or, during a short period (say, 2 months or so?) both fields could
be there, and icq should really be dropped.
Or, they could both be there (if space permits) with the ICQ field
output as [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Talking about encouragement... (-:
--
5 matches
Mail list logo
