Re: libcrypto++ (Was: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading)

2005-07-24 Thread Nathanael Nerode
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am fighting with libcrypto++ but so far I am loosing. This is an exceedingly nasty library. There is way too much templatization in this library, and GCC spews warnings like there's no tomorrow. I'd be interested in working on tracking down the linking problems, but

Re: libcrypto++ (Was: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading)

2005-07-23 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:33:28AM +0200, Jens Peter Secher wrote: GCC4 does definitely not like a mix of templates and anonymous enums [1,2] but there are easy fixes for this. [1] clearly stats this as illegal according to the C++ standard. What is worse, it seems that GCC4 silently refuses

libcrypto++ (Was: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading)

2005-07-22 Thread Jens Peter Secher
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Below is a list of libraries which appear to be blocking other packages that need to go through the C++ transition[1] and which are themselves ready to go through the ABI transition. [...] libcrypto++ I am fighting with libcrypto++ but so far I am

Re: libcrypto++ (Was: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading)

2005-07-22 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 01:33 +0200, Jens Peter Secher wrote: I am fighting with libcrypto++ but so far I am loosing. GCC4 does definitely not like a mix of templates and anonymous enums [1,2] but there are easy fixes for this. What is worse, it seems that GCC4 silently refuses to generate