Re: libzstd_1.3.3+dfsg-2_multi.changes REJECTED

Chris Lamb dijo [Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:52:18PM +0100]: > (...) > Whilst this is not the most egregious example, I am not enjoying > this recent trend of almost-immediately escalating issues to our > mailing lists. > > As has been pointed out elsewhere, people make mistakes in > technical

Re: libzstd_1.3.3+dfsg-2_multi.changes REJECTED

Roberto C. Sánchez (2018-04-18): > I have, on occasion, written messages that I later (sometimes even > immediately) regretted. What has worked well for me and helped prevent > me from initiating or compounding situations like those you point out > is this process: > > - Get

Re: libzstd_1.3.3+dfsg-2_multi.changes REJECTED

On 18/04/2018 13:52, Chris Lamb wrote: With all due respect to yourself, waldi, and ftp-team (masters & assistants & wizards), I find this reject comment inappropriate, and not at all informative enough. Regardless of the merit of your arguments, I am sure it would have been more productive to

Re: libzstd_1.3.3+dfsg-2_multi.changes REJECTED

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:52:18PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Whilst this is not the most egregious example, I am not enjoying > this recent trend of almost-immediately escalating issues to our > mailing lists. > ... > > If one feels hurt or aggrievied by an interaction that might be >

Re: libzstd_1.3.3+dfsg-2_multi.changes REJECTED

Dimitri et al., > With all due respect to yourself, waldi, and ftp-team (masters & > assistants & wizards), I find this reject comment inappropriate, and > not at all informative enough. Regardless of the merit of your arguments, I am sure it would have been more productive to reply to Thorsten

Re: libzstd_1.3.3+dfsg-2_multi.changes REJECTED

Hi, On 17 April 2018 at 20:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > as requested by waldi ... > With all due respect to yourself, waldi, and ftp-team (masters & assistants & wizards), I find this reject comment inappropriate, and not at all informative enough. As far