-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
En/na Joey Hess ha escrit:
mydms package now has been corrected and now depends on debconf |
debconf-2.0.
Joey Hess wrote:
Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
on debconf by itself without an alternate
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I've tried to search for what debconf-2.0 specification is;
and how it's different from debconf, but it's not obvious.
What's missing from the picture is the changelog of debconf
specification (presumably from 1.0), and what's changed.
Please see Debian policy.
--
see
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I've tried to search for what debconf-2.0 specification is;
and how it's different from debconf, but it's not obvious.
What's missing from the picture is the changelog of debconf
specification (presumably from 1.0), and what's
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P
[-SNIP-]
Edward Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
I wonder why you didn't sent it to debian-devel-announce then? This is
where this really belongs, not? This is what the list is for, not?
It seemed a bit excessive to mail everyone just to get in touch with 286
maintainers. Also I like to encourage the proper use of
Hi,
This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P
It's not entirely clear from the posting, but all that's required
on the
* lunedì 26 settembre 2005, alle 19:57, Joey Hess scrive:
Joey Hess wrote:
Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:57:23 +0200, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
aide
This is fixed in experimental (dinstall on 2005-09-27), and will go to
unstable in about a week once the package (which has suffered pretty
big changes) has shown not to contain any
Hi,
Of course I read debian-devel. But I fix bugs once they are
reported. I use the BTS to track needed work in this way.
This is of course suprerior to running vi debian/control because
beauracracy is fun.
I'm transitioning one of my packages to a potential new-maintainer;
and it
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
flyspray
fixed on yesterday.
I missed your posts on d-devel. maybe a post on d-d-announce would
have been more accurate given the number of concerned packages ?
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il giorno 26/set/05, alle ore 19:57, Joey Hess ha scritto:
Luigi Gangitano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libapache-mod-acct
Fixed yesterday in 0.5-19.
Regards,
- --
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-26 19:57]:
Joey Hess wrote:
Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
soon, which,
Joey Hess wrote:
Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P
Of course I read debian-devel. But I fix bugs
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Of course I read debian-devel. But I fix bugs once they are
reported. I use the BTS to track needed work in this way.
This is of course suprerior to running vi debian/control because
beauracracy is fun.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Of course I read debian-devel. But I fix bugs once they are
reported. I use the BTS to track needed work in this way.
This is of course suprerior to running vi debian/control because
beauracracy is fun.
No, it's because this
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 07:57:23PM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages
remaining, down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people
below do not read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing
you all. :-P
Absolutely right. ;-) d-d is too busy. Thanks
Hi Joey,
Paul Waite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
axyl
axyl-lucene
Now done, but not yet uploaded due to other changes in the works. I'm
expecting I will get them both uploaded inside two weeks - is that a good
enough timescale for you?
Cheers,
Paul.
Joey Hess schrieb:
Joey Hess wrote:
Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue*
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 19:57 +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
soon,
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 19:57 +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P
Yep, debian-devel is not high
Joey Hess wrote:
This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P
Debian Apache Maintainers debian-apache@lists.debian.org
Hello
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 07:57:23PM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of
Quoting Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Do you people really need to inform all the debian-devel readers of
this?
Hmmm, apologies (public...just like apologies have to be). This was
intended to be a private reply, but it seems that my fingers are more
used to the L key.
--
To
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:27:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
soon, which,
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
geneweb
Fixed in 4.10-10
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joey Hess wrote:
| debconf-2.0
dput
Thanks for the reminder.
Fixed in 0.9.2.20.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you people really need to inform all the debian-devel readers of
this?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 16:27 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
soon, which, omitting all
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:27:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
soon, which, omitting
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:27:12 -0400, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
clamav-data
clamav-getfiles
Upload of fixed packages pending current unstable versions migrating
to testing. ETA: Monday.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 09:28:44PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
spellcast
Spellcast 1.0-19 was uploaded Aug 6th 2005 and does not use debconf anymore.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~apt-cache show spellcast | egrep Version\|Depends
Version: 1.0-19
Depends:
Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550
bugs.
Also,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:27:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Also, thanks to everyone who did fix 20 or so packages due to my first
mail at the beginning of the month.
(...)
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nessus-plugins
Forgot to fix this one, will upload 2.2.5-3 right
* Joey Hess schrieb am 31.08.05, um 22:27 Uhr:
Debian VDR Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nvram-wakeup
Fixed package was uploaded a few minutes ago.
Regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Schmidt, Debian VDR Team
http://pkg-vdr-dvb.alioth.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Achilleas Kotsis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ulogd
Fixed localy, will upload soon (due to sponsored upload)
Achilleas Kotsis a.k.a. Achille
-- whois awk?, sed Grep --
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joey Hess wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~apt-cache dumpavail | grep-dctrl -FDepends debconf \
|grep-dctrl -FDepends -v '| debconf-2.0' | grep ^Package: \
| cut -d : -f 2 | dd-list --stdin
Assuming a sid grep-dctrl,
grep-aptavail -FDepends debconf -a -! -FDepends '| debconf-2.0' \
Joey Hess wrote:
...
Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs
nas
seyon
New versions of all three uploaded tonight to fix this...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Because heaters aren't purple! -- Catherine Pitt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
spellcast
Spellcast 1.0-19 was uploaded Aug 6th 2005 and does not use debconf anymore.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~apt-cache show spellcast | egrep Version\|Depends
Version: 1.0-19
Depends: debconf, gettext, libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libx11-6 | xlibs ( 4.1.0)
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:27:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Kari Pahula [EMAIL PROTECTED]
crossfire
1.8.0-1 does not use debconf anymore. Still looking for a sponsor for
the upload.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I intend to eventually file bugs on packages in Debian which depend on
debconf without an alternate of debconf-2.0, as all of these make it
impossible to install cdebconf, which we would eventually like to
replace debconf.
[...]
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 17:08 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
I offered this for adoption a while back. Nobody took up my offer. I
finally uploaded xpilot-ng today (see my 3-year-old ITP #141099) and
plan to make it supercede xpilot (i.e. strip the contents of the old
xpilot packages to turn them
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phpbb2
For the curious: fixed in svn, will be included in next upload.
Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2005-08-02 18:46 -0400]:
I intend to eventually file bugs on packages in Debian which depend on
debconf without an alternate of debconf-2.0, as all of these make it
impossible to install cdebconf, which we would eventually like to
replace debconf.
[...]
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:46:20 -0400, Joey Hess uttered
xringd
Fixed package in unstable as of a few days ago.
Cheers,
--
Steve
C offers you enough rope to hang yourself.
C++ offers a fully equipped firing squad, a last cigarette and
a blindfold.
Joey Hess wrote:
Radu Spineanu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fprobe-ng
fprobe-ulog
xmail
Since everybody is providing feedback...
I will prepare new packages tommorow and ask my sponsors to upload them.
Radu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I intend to eventually file bugs on packages in Debian which depend on
debconf without an alternate of debconf-2.0, as all of these make it
impossible to install cdebconf, which we would eventually like to
replace debconf.
Neil
Ok, since everybody is reporting back here I will do the same:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
checksecurity
euro-support
remem
Done and uploaded.
samhain
snort
I will submit new upstream versions of these when time permits
and will fix this in
because everyone else is doing it...
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cacti
cacti-cactid
sugarplum
all three have now been uploaded with proper dependencies.
sean
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has
been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf
began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in dependencies
it generates for packages using debhelper.
Hi.
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 00:46, Joey Hess wrote:
Juan Manuel Garcia Molina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
facturalux
Fixed locally, it will be included in next upload.
moodle-book
I have just uploaded a package with the correction included.
Regards,
Juanma.
--
Juan Manuel Garcia
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has
been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf
began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in
dependencies it
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Russ Allbery wrote:
debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has
been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf
began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in
dependencies it generates for packages using debhelper.
An, 2005 08 02 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess rašė:
Kęstutis Biliūnas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ispell-lt
Fixed and the new package is in incoming now.
--
Kęstutis Biliūnas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Ben Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xpilot
I offered this for adoption a while back. Nobody took up my offer. I
finally uploaded xpilot-ng today (see my 3-year-old ITP #141099) and
plan to make it supercede xpilot (i.e. strip the contents of
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 05:08:33PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Ben Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xpilot
I offered this for adoption a while back. Nobody took up my offer. I
finally uploaded xpilot-ng today (see my 3-year-old ITP
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:46:20 -0400, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian Adduser Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
adduser
Fixed version in svn, will be uploaded when the current unstable
versio has migrated to testing.
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
clamav-data
clamav-getfiles
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 22:13 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Just curious: why not, in that case, upload xpilot-ng as xpilot?
If the new upstream is actually the better one, it makes sense for it
to go on under the label of xpilot in my opinion.
I'm still holding out for the remote chance
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Moreover I wonder what the criteria of db_installdebconf are to
be clever enough to ignore the lines
. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
db_get shared/zope/restart || true
in the postinst file because the package depends from a package
that just
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which does not really seem to work in all cases. I'm using a shared
debconf template (shared/zope/restart) in postinst scripts of some Zope
products. I tried to replace the debconf dependency according to your
suggestion, but the resulting Debian
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 02:32:55PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which does not really seem to work in all cases. I'm using a shared
debconf template (shared/zope/restart) in postinst scripts of some Zope
products. I tried to replace the debconf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess) writes:
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
localepurge
The next upload will contain the correction.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Joey Hess [Tue, 02 Aug 2005 18:46:20 -0400]:
Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org
kdebase
kdenetwork
Fixed in SVN, will be in the next upload.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Old men are fond of giving good advice to console
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 00.46, Joey Hess wrote:
[debconf dance]
Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
postgrey
tags +pending (fixed in svn)
I hear a new upstream version is in the works, so I'll wait a week or two
before uploading.
cheers
-- vbi
--
featured product: SpamAssassin -
Hi,
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-03 00:46]:
|libphp-adodb
fixed and uploaded.
Regards,
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Sauter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
[...]
Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cpufreqd
fixed and uploaded.
--
mattia
:wq!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050803 12:51]:
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005, Julien BLACHE wrote:
I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's
only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database.
You can do that only if those old debconf
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050803 12:51]:
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005, Julien BLACHE wrote:
I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's
only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database.
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, you don't need the dependency even in that case. You can just make
the code only to run if there is debconf installed.
Good call. I thought Julien meant removing the purge old stuff from the
database, and not just the dependency.
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Max Vozeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cdtool
The debconf question will be dropped in next upload. It asks about the
/dev/cdrom symlink that is created elsewhere nowadays.
cheers,
Max
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Joey,
Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sane-backends
tilp
I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's
only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian GNU/Linux Developer -
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005, Julien BLACHE wrote:
I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's
only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database.
You can do that only if those old debconf questions were never in a stable
release (i.e. they existed only during 'sid'
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Since so many packages need to be fixed, I may resort to additional
private mails (or d-d-a mail) before I begin filing bug reports. The
A mail to d-d-a would probably be a good idea in any case - I can't be
the only person who's never
I intend to eventually file bugs on packages in Debian which depend on
debconf without an alternate of debconf-2.0, as all of these make it
impossible to install cdebconf, which we would eventually like to
replace debconf.
debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has
been
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt-listchanges
cricket
flac
I have no idea how or why flac ended up with a debconf dependency; it
doesn't use it. I've removed it in CVS for my next upload; no bug is
necessary.
--
- mdz
76 matches
Mail list logo
