Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:08:00PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
wrote:
Based on the text on the w.d.o frontpage it seems that Michael Ivey
has provided the tar.gz with all the w.d.n contents.
I would like to make a desperate plee that some attempt is made to
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:08:00PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
wrote:
Based on the text on the w.d.o frontpage it seems that Michael Ivey
has provided the tar.gz with all the w.d.n contents.
I would like to make a desperate plee that some attempt is made to
incorporate a clear
Hi,
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:13, Jon Dowland wrote:
I would like to make a desperate plee that some attempt is made to
incorporate a clear indication of the licence under which material on
this wiki is available under, either with a user-readable prompt or
machine-readable metadata
[Jon Dowland]
I would like to make a desperate plee that some attempt is made to
incorporate a clear indication of the licence under which material on
this wiki is available under, either with a user-readable prompt or
machine-readable metadata (ideally both).
I might be slow, but can you
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Jon Dowland]
I would like to make a desperate plee that some attempt is made to
incorporate a clear indication of the licence under which material on
this wiki is available under, either with a user-readable prompt or
machine-readable metadata
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:58:59AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I might be slow, but can you explain why we need a license for this?
I do not need to license my books, but I do need to license my
software. Why should the wiki documents be treated more like software
than a book?
your
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:34:29AM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
The wiki markup languages of twiki and moin-moin are not
compatible. Still it would be nice to have some content moved
from the old .net wiki to the new .org one.
This is the first I've heard of plans for a wiki under the
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:41:40AM +0200, Andreas Fester wrote:
I thought that the wiki was to be moved to mediawiki?
http://wiki.debian.net/?HelpMoveDebianWikiToMediaWiki
Will w.d.org be a replacement for w.d.net? With the latter
leading to the same page once the migration is done?
On
* Jon Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-05 10:04:54]:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:34:29AM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
The wiki markup languages of twiki and moin-moin are not
compatible. Still it would be nice to have some content moved
from the old .net wiki to the new .org one.
la, 2005-09-03 kello 01:34 +0200, Andreas Schuldei kirjoitti:
The wiki markup languages of twiki and moin-moin are not
compatible. Still it would be nice to have some content moved
from the old .net wiki to the new .org one.
wiki.debian.net seems to be running kwiki, not twiki, in case that
I thought that the wiki was to be moved to mediawiki?
http://wiki.debian.net/?HelpMoveDebianWikiToMediaWiki
Will w.d.org be a replacement for w.d.net? With the latter
leading to the same page once the migration is done?
Best Regards,
Andreas
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
The wiki markup
On 10401 March 1977, Andreas Fester wrote:
Will w.d.org be a replacement for w.d.net?
Thats the intention of it.
With the latter leading to the same page once the migration is done?
That depends on the one who has it right now, but would be the best, yes.
--
bye Joerg
StevenK [Clint]: I'm
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:34:29AM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
I did not find migration scripts between the two wikis. Do they
exist? Is someone who is familiar with both wikis interested in
writing one?
Based on the text on the w.d.o frontpage it seems that Michael Ivey
has provided the
also sprach Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.09.03.1308
+0200]:
Based on the text on the w.d.o frontpage it seems that Michael
Ivey has provided the tar.gz with all the w.d.n contents.
... at which point it would make sense to discourage any further
edits to the old wiki.
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:08:00PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:34:29AM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
I did not find migration scripts between the two wikis. Do they
exist? Is someone who is familiar with both wikis interested in
writing one?
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 02:10:57PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
I wonder whether with moin moin, there needs to happen anything else
too, for example (index files rebuild or something?).
No, there are only cache files which are rebuilt if needed.
Bastian
--
Conquest is easy.
also sprach Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.09.03.1410 +0200]:
member. I wonder whether with moin moin, there needs to happen anything else
too, for example (index files rebuild or something?). Unfortunately I'm
From my experience, there are no indices.
--
Please do not send
On Sep 3, 2005, at 6:13 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
at which point it would make sense to discourage any further
edits to the old wiki
I have made it read-only, and am happy to use mod_rewrite to send
wiki.d.n requests to wiki.d.o ... or to change the CNAME to point
directly to wiki.d.o,
also sprach Michael D. Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.09.03.1550 +0200]:
I have made it read-only, and am happy to use mod_rewrite to send
This is a good idea, but only if the migration can be completed
soon. Otherwise I suggest making it writable again until a migration
path exists, and then to
The wiki markup languages of twiki and moin-moin are not
compatible. Still it would be nice to have some content moved
from the old .net wiki to the new .org one. (the debconf team for
one is interested in using the features of moin-moin for easier
cooperation and to keep the existing pages.)
The
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 01:34 +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
The wiki markup languages of twiki and moin-moin are not
compatible. Still it would be nice to have some content moved
from the old .net wiki to the new .org one. (the debconf team for
one is interested in using the features of
21 matches
Mail list logo
