On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:27:19AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 14/05/14 23:34, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
In the last week at least 13 of my own servers/VMs at two sites (each site
has a caching DNS resolver), my desktop and also my laptop from offsite
have been querying this zone, every
Hi,
On 16/05/14 00:00, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
I'm guessing the gb.* lookups are mostly you. The au.* lookups are DSA.
That leaves somebody looking up nl*. You and he/she might be the last users
of
this zone.
Why did you discount the fr., it. and us. queries?
nl.arm. does not seem to
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 01:16:58AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 16/05/14 00:00, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
I'm guessing the gb.* lookups are mostly you. The au.* lookups are DSA.
That leaves somebody looking up nl*. You and he/she might be the last
users of this zone.
Why did you
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:48:12PM +, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:00:55AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 29/04/14 23:22, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
If there is any more you can tell me about this DNS zone, it would be
nice to document it better at
On 14/05/14 15:25, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
In consultation with the mirror team, I will be dropping the mirror.debian.net
zone, today.
Oh, that's unfortunate. And odd to remove the service on such short
notice, unless I'm really the only person using it.
It may have been preferable to replace
Hi,
On Wednesday 14 May 2014 19:39:52 Steven Chamberlain wrote:
[...]
Perhaps even http.debian.net, if Raphael wouldn't mind setting up the
(many) necessary wildcard virtual host to make it work.
I don't think there are many users of $cc.$arch.mirror.debian.net, but if
anyone fancies adding
On 14/05/14 22:24, Raphael Geissert wrote:
I don't think there are many users of $cc.$arch.mirror.debian.net, [...]
I don't think anyone can really know this currently?
but if
anyone fancies adding the DNS entries, http.d.n should now be accepting
anything with *.mirror.debian.net, and
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:39:39PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 14/05/14 22:24, Raphael Geissert wrote:
I don't think there are many users of $cc.$arch.mirror.debian.net, [...]
I don't think anyone can really know this currently?
I looked at the logs on ns1.debian.org through
On 14/05/14 23:00, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
I looked at the logs on ns1.debian.org through ns4.debian.org for the last
week. Not a single request that wasn't for SOA or RRSIG or DNSKEY, all from
debian machines.
Some may have gone to easydns' name servers, I suppose, but the debian
nameservers
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:32:07PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 14/05/14 23:00, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
I looked at the logs on ns1.debian.org through ns4.debian.org for the last
week. Not a single request that wasn't for SOA or RRSIG or DNSKEY, all from
debian machines.
Some may
On 14/05/14 23:34, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
In the last week at least 13 of my own servers/VMs at two sites (each
site has a caching DNS resolver), my desktop and also my laptop from
offsite have been querying this zone, every day. I debootstrapped a new
chroot using this zone only two days ago.
[Copying the appropriate list]
Luca Filipozzi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:00:55AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 29/04/14 23:22, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
It should be mostly corrected now although one name server is still not
transferring properly.
Technicians have been
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:00:55AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 29/04/14 23:22, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
It should be mostly corrected now although one name server is still not
transferring properly.
Technicians have been deployed.
If there is any more you can tell me about this
Dear DSA,
I'm suddenly unable to resolve records under the mirror.debian.net DNS
zone. It is apparently not a zone registered in Debian LDAP, so 'seems
to be DSA territory' according to http://wiki.debian.org/DebianGeoMirror
I couldn't find any announcement relating to it, so wonder if it is an
Hi,
It's a consequence of service provider's automated (and hasty) provisioning.
It should be mostly corrected now although one name server is still not
transferring properly.
Technicians have been deployed.
Luca
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:40:38PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Dear DSA,
On 29/04/14 23:22, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
It should be mostly corrected now although one name server is still not
transferring properly.
Technicians have been deployed.
Thank you! So I presume it will be coming back.
If there is any more you can tell me about this DNS zone, it would be
nice
16 matches
Mail list logo
