netstd split -- pseudo package for upgrades from hamm

1999-01-19 Thread Ben Gertzfield
Brandon == Brandon Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Santiago I think it is absolutely essential for the success of Santiago Debian 2.1 that nobody will automagically lose Santiago functionality in the upgrade process. Brandon Done in experimental changes file: * xbase is now a

Re: netstd split -- pseudo package for upgrades from hamm

1999-01-19 Thread Santiago Vila
On 19 Jan 1999, Ben Gertzfield wrote: Brandon == Brandon Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Santiago I think it is absolutely essential for the success of Santiago Debian 2.1 that nobody will automagically lose Santiago functionality in the upgrade process. Brandon Done

Re: netstd split -- pseudo package for upgrades from hamm

1999-01-19 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 11:44:14AM -0800, Ben Gertzfield wrote: Now if we could only convince the netstd maintainer to make a pseudo-package for all his splits.. but he has told me he refuses to support upgrades for anything but dselect. :/ That's disappointing. Why will dselect handle it