Re: openssl 3.1.5-1.1 effect on reverse dependencies

2024-03-06 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 08:50:59PM +0100, Micha Lenk wrote: > >> You recently uploaded openssl 3.1.5-1.1. > >> > >> Are you tracking the effect it had on reverse dependencies? > >That's just a part of the time64 transition and it's definitely tracked by > >people. > > > Yet I wonder how I as a

Re: openssl 3.1.5-1.1 effect on reverse dependencies

2024-03-06 Thread Micha Lenk
Hi all, Am 6. März 2024 17:05:15 MEZ schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin : >On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 07:47:57AM -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: >> Hi Benjamin! >> >> You recently uploaded openssl 3.1.5-1.1. >> >> Are you tracking the effect it had on reverse dependencies? >That's just a part of the time64

Re: openssl 3.1.5-1.1 effect on reverse dependencies

2024-03-06 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 07:47:57AM -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hi Benjamin! > > You recently uploaded openssl 3.1.5-1.1. > > Are you tracking the effect it had on reverse dependencies? That's just a part of the time64 transition and it's definitely tracked by people. -- WBR, wRAR

openssl 3.1.5-1.1 effect on reverse dependencies

2024-03-06 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi Benjamin! You recently uploaded openssl 3.1.5-1.1. Are you tracking the effect it had on reverse dependencies? Do you have plans to do any follow-up uploads or +b1 rebuilds of other packages? For example curl is unable to satisfy build dependencies on armhf/armel at the moment: