On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006, Erast Benson wrote:
+Provides: sunwlxsl [solaris-i386]
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Why not simply use Provide: ${misc:Provides} and set misc:Provides to
sunwlxsl on solaris-i386?
OK. This was a
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:13:57AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the
time, doesn't it provide sunwlxsl on other arches?
But how? sunwlxsl is something which is only present in
OpenSolaris-based
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:13:57AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the
time, doesn't it provide sunwlxsl on other arches?
But how? sunwlxsl is something which is only present in
OpenSolaris-based
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 12:18 +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:13:57AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the
time, doesn't it provide sunwlxsl on other arches?
But how?
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 17:41 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:13:57AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the
time, doesn't it provide sunwlxsl on other arches?
But how?
libxslt package where I'm trying to use
Provides field but for solaris-i386 architecture only.
Could you guys confirm that per-architecture Provides field is a
supported format? If not, what would be the right way?
===
--- debian
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006, Erast Benson wrote:
+Provides: sunwlxsl [solaris-i386]
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Why not simply use Provide: ${misc:Provides} and set misc:Provides to
sunwlxsl on solaris-i386? Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the
time, doesn't it provide sunwlxsl
7 matches
Mail list logo
