Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
First we need to solve the IMHO broken Alternatives Settings of those Perl
Packages. They messed up my System more than one.
See the BTS, there are patches (#80143). Someone should NMU it, it's absurd
it's been left so broken for so long.
perl-5.6-base is removing
all
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 03:26:07PM -, Moshe Zadka wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Dariush Pietrzak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure that solves all the problems - I'd like apache-perl
recompiled against perl5.6, and so the rest of modules.
I would do, but I'm not at all sure if
Le Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:24:34AM -0800, Joey Hess écrivait:
liblocale-gettext-perl
libmldbm-perl
dpkg-ftp
Those 3 are mine. I've just done it. No need to file a bug.
perl-5.005-suid
This one should not be updated :)
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog -+-
I'm planning a mass automated -quiet bug reporting spree against almost
all packages that depend on perl 5.00{5,4}[-base]. All such packages
should be updated to depend on perl-5.6 (possibly with 5.005 as an
alternate).
84 packages[1] would get bug reports; most are perl module packages.
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:24:34AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
I'm planning a mass automated -quiet bug reporting spree against almost
all packages that depend on perl 5.00{5,4}[-base]. All such packages
should be updated to depend on perl-5.6 (possibly with 5.005 as an
alternate).
ITYM
all packages that depend on perl 5.00{5,4}[-base]. All such packages
should be updated to depend on perl-5.6 (possibly with 5.005 as an
alternate).
I'm not sure that solves all the problems - I'd like apache-perl
recompiled against perl5.6, and so the rest of modules.
It's no use if I got
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Dariush Pietrzak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure that solves all the problems - I'd like apache-perl
recompiled against perl5.6, and so the rest of modules.
I would do, but I'm not at all sure if mod_perl works with Perl 5.6.
Last I heard, they weren't playing well
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 03:26:07PM -, Moshe Zadka wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Dariush Pietrzak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure that solves all the problems - I'd like apache-perl
recompiled against perl5.6, and so the rest of modules.
I would do, but I'm not at all sure if
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:43:13PM +0100, I wrote:
I can verify that it works, we did a local recompile:
Maybe we did, but I can't read apt-cache output because this version
comes simply from unstable.
So no ifs and whens, it's already done and it works.
--
The idea is that the first face
Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
It's no use if I got hmm say Apache::DBI module, but perl5.6 can't find it
because it's in 5.005 tree, and DBD::Pg hidden in 5.005 tree, that cannot
be used by 5.6 due to some binary incompatibilities.
Um, afaik perl 5.6 is fully binary compatable, and it certianly
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:12:19PM +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
Or did I got completely confused and misunderstood the case?
First we need to solve the IMHO broken Alternatives Settings of those Perl
Packages. They messed up my System more than one. perl-5.6-base is removing
all the old perl
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 03:26:07PM -, Moshe Zadka wrote:
I would do, but I'm not at all sure if mod_perl works with Perl 5.6.
Last I heard, they weren't playing well together.
Works for me with slash. I only need to fix the Perl alternatives.
Greetings
Bernd
--
(OO) -- [EMAIL
12 matches
Mail list logo
