Re: popsneaker vs. bandwidth consumption [was:Re: Virus emails]

2003-09-25 Thread Jochen Voss
Hello, On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 03:41:36PM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote: snip - Package: popsneaker Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: mail Installed-Size: 159 Maintainer: Stefan Baehre [EMAIL PROTECTED] Version: 0.6.2-1 Depends:

Re: popsneaker vs. bandwidth consumption

2003-09-24 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Of those packages in the archive, mailfilter is the best IMHO. However, I ended up *not* using it because it doesn't support ANDing of conditions AFAICT (size 100k AND header spelling SUBJECT:). Then maybe you should have a look at popsneaker. With

Re: popsneaker vs. bandwidth consumption

2003-09-24 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ah, and a fast fix for the actual worm is to set MAXSIZE_ALLOW to something smaller than 140k. Erm. Its MAXSIZE_DENY for this, except one defines the virus senders with some ALLOW rule before. Brrr. :) -- bye Joerg 2.5 million B.C.: OOG the Open Source

Re: popsneaker vs. bandwidth consumption

2003-09-22 Thread Paul Seelig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Atterer) writes: Of those packages in the archive, mailfilter is the best IMHO. However, I ended up *not* using it because it doesn't support ANDing of conditions AFAICT (size 100k AND header spelling SUBJECT:). Then maybe you should have a look at popsneaker.