On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:34:12PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 15:49, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:44:22PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
The negative effect for the users is that you can't upgrade python
while wxgtk-python is installed so
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:37:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:34:12PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 15:49, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:44:22PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
The negative effect for the users is
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 11:22:43AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
| On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 08:33:26AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
| Now, I could do the dependency on python (= 2.2), python (2.3) thing.
| But what would that gain me or users? I see no benefit there, other than
| people
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:44:22PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
The negative effect for the users is that you can't upgrade python
while wxgtk-python is installed so you can't try out the
latest-and-greatest python in the meantime. This is the issue at
hand.
Sure you can:
$
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 15:49, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:44:22PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
The negative effect for the users is that you can't upgrade python
while wxgtk-python is installed so you can't try out the
latest-and-greatest python in the meantime.
Josip Rodin wrote:
Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.* packages
every time python* is mentioned? :P
Actually I'm more reminded of the perl* packages and the complete mess
that followed. And I keep expecting to see the same set of problems
affect python.
--
see
Joey Hess writes:
Josip Rodin wrote:
Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.* packages
every time python* is mentioned? :P
Actually I'm more reminded of the perl* packages and the complete mess
that followed. And I keep expecting to see the same set of problems
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 02:04:52AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Joey Hess writes:
Josip Rodin wrote:
Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.*
packages
every time python* is mentioned? :P
Actually I'm more reminded of the perl* packages and the complete
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:47:48AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
There is an alternative... only support one version of python... and be
stuck at python 2.1 until everything uses it, or lose things like zope
etc.
Alternatively the python developers could try to keep backwards
compatibility :-|
i agree, we have a great support for Python.
thanks to those who make it possible.
cavok
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:47:48AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
...
Personally I was going to post nice job everyone... the Python Policy
looks like it is working. There are still a few niggly things,
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:31:53PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Last weekend, python 2.3 was released.
With the next python2.3 upload, python2.3 becomes the default python
version.
Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.* packages
every time python* is mentioned? :P
hmmm.. just curious... why?
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:18:53AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:31:53PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Last weekend, python 2.3 was released.
With the next python2.3 upload, python2.3 becomes the default python
version.
Am I the only one
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:18:53AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.*
packages every time python* is mentioned? :P
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 02:59:00PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
hmmm.. just curious... why?
The short of it: he's
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:33:26AM -0500, Chad Walstrom wrote:
Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.*
packages every time python* is mentioned? :P
hmmm.. just curious... why?
The short of it: he's joking. Note the smiley. Even though package
names that
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 02:17, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:33:26AM -0500, Chad Walstrom wrote:
Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.*
packages every time python* is mentioned? :P
hmmm.. just curious... why?
The short of it: he's
Last weekend, python 2.3 was released. For an overview see
http://python.org/2.3/highlights.html
With the next python2.3 upload, python2.3 becomes the default python
version. Some packages become uninstallable until they are converted
to the new version. In this time you should not update
16 matches
Mail list logo
