Accepted node-shebang-command 2.0.0-1 (source) into unstable

2021-12-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 19:23:28 +0100 Source: node-shebang-command Architecture: source Version: 2.0.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By: Yadd Changes: node-shebang-command

Accepted node-shebang-command 1.2.0-2 (source) into unstable

2021-12-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 19:09:50 +0100 Source: node-shebang-command Architecture: source Version: 1.2.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By: Yadd Changes: node-shebang-command

Accepted node-shebang-regex 3.0.0-2 (source) into unstable

2021-10-11 Thread Debian FTP Masters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:43:30 +0200 Source: node-shebang-regex Architecture: source Version: 3.0.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By: Yadd Changes: node-shebang-regex

Accepted node-shebang-command 1.2.0-1.1 (source) into unstable

2020-12-27 Thread Debian FTP Masters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 01:10:19 +0100 Source: node-shebang-command Architecture: source Version: 1.2.0-1.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By: Holger Levsen Changes: node

Accepted node-shebang-regex 3.0.0-1 (source) into unstable

2020-10-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:04:09 +0200 Source: node-shebang-regex Architecture: source Version: 3.0.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By: Xavier Guimard Changes: node-shebang

Accepted node-shebang-command 1.2.0-1 (source all) into unstable, unstable

2016-11-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 12:28:10 +0530 Source: node-shebang-command Binary: node-shebang-command Architecture: source all Version: 1.2.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers <pkg-javascript

Bug#845410: ITP: node-shebang-command -- Get the command from a shebang

2016-11-22 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen <prav...@debian.org> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-shebang-command Version : 1.2.0 Upstream Author : Kevin Martensson <kevinmartens...@gmail.com> (github.com/kevva) * URL

Accepted node-shebang-regex 2.0.0-1 (source all) into unstable, unstable

2016-11-22 Thread Pirate Praveen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 19:17:08 +0530 Source: node-shebang-regex Binary: node-shebang-regex Architecture: source all Version: 2.0.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers <pkg-javascript

Bug#845327: ITP: node-shebang-regex -- Regular expression for matching a shebang line

2016-11-22 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen <prav...@debian.org> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-shebang-regex Version : 2.0.0 Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus <sindresor...@gmail.com> (sindresorhus.com) * URL

shebang (was Re: systemd - some more considerations)

2014-04-04 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, Chow Loong Jin wrote: Are you sure about this? Yes. Some references would be helpful. I can't seem to find anything on this through Sure. I’ve patched mksh to use “#?” ipv “#!” as shebang, to simulate a kernel not supporting the shebang: Index: exec.c

Re: shebang (was Re: systemd - some more considerations)

2014-04-04 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 12:58:23PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Are you sure about this? Yes. Some references would be helpful. I can't seem to find anything on this through Sure. I’ve patched mksh mksh doesn't count as a reference. some cursory googling. Try duckduckgoïng

Re: shebang (was Re: systemd - some more considerations)

2014-04-04 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Thorsten Glaser t.gla...@tarent.de writes: On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, Chow Loong Jin wrote: Are you sure about this? Yes. Some references would be helpful. I can't seem to find anything on this through Sure. I’ve patched mksh to use “#?” ipv “#!” as shebang, to simulate a kernel

Re: shebang

2014-04-04 Thread Thorsten Glaser
cited, it’s probably not. Doesn’t mean the shell doesn’t or shouldn’t. Also, “man mksh” look for EXECSHELL (which is the interpreter the shell uses if the script doesn’t even have a shebang). I don't think the manual for a not commonly used shell is a good reference... Uhm, excuse me

Re: shebang (was Re: systemd - some more considerations)

2014-04-04 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Thorsten Glaser t.gla...@tarent.de, 2014-04-04, 12:58: Try duckduckgoïng instead ☻ or searching POSIX, or something. SUSv4 “helpfully” says: If the first line of a file of shell commands starts with the characters #!, the results are unspecified. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: shebang (was Re: systemd - some more considerations)

2014-04-04 Thread Salvo Tomaselli
In data venerdì 04 aprile 2014 17.38.12, Andrey Rahmatullin ha scritto: Sure. I’ve patched mksh mksh doesn't count as a reference. Did you even read before replying? He patched it to use #? Instead of #! that was using. He was sure about it being there because he had patched it to behave

Re: shebang

2014-04-04 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
doesn’t even have a shebang). I don't think the manual for a not commonly used shell is a good reference... Uhm, excuse me? “Larry Page: 1.5 million Android devices activated every day” “Android device activations set to hit 1 billion soon” ‣ http://www.androidcentral.com/larry-page-15

Re: shebang (was Re: systemd - some more considerations)

2014-04-04 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 02:04:32PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: Sure. I’ve patched mksh mksh doesn't count as a reference. Did you even read before replying? He patched it to use #? Instead of #! that was using. He was sure about it being there because he had patched it to behave

Re: shebang (was Re: systemd - some more considerations)

2014-04-04 Thread Matthias Urlichs
the ability to run shebang-less scripts from our shells. Currently, they do this: * bash opens the script and interprets it * ash dash immediately execve() /bin/sh with the script * mksh obviously opens the file and tries to read the #! line, which seems pointless because the kernel already did

Re: Clarify rationale for 'debian/rules' shebang line

2009-11-19 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:51:31PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:20:17PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:12:33PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: === modified file 'policy.sgml' --- policy.sgml 2009-10-21

Re: Clarify rationale for 'debian/rules' shebang line

2009-11-17 Thread Russ Allbery
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:20:17PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:12:33PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: === modified file 'policy.sgml' --- policy.sgml 2009-10-21 20:49:37 + +++ policy.sgml 2009-10-31 01:10:42 + @@ -1725,7

Re: Clarify rationale for 'debian/rules' shebang line

2009-11-15 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:12:33PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: === modified file 'policy.sgml' --- policy.sgml 2009-10-21 20:49:37 + +++ policy.sgml 2009-10-31 01:10:42 + @@ -1725,7 +1725,10 @@ p It must start with the line tt#!/usr/bin/make -f/tt, so that

Re: Clarify rationale for 'debian/rules' shebang line

2009-11-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:20:17PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:12:33PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: === modified file 'policy.sgml' --- policy.sgml 2009-10-21 20:49:37 + +++ policy.sgml 2009-10-31 01:10:42 + @@ -1725,7 +1725,10 @@ p It

Re: Clarify rationale for ‘debian/rules ’ shebang line

2009-11-01 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Peter Samuelson (I think this discussion is getting silly, feel free to take it to private mail.) | | === modified file 'policy.sgml' | | --- policy.sgml 2009-10-21 20:49:37 + | | +++ policy.sgml 2009-10-31 00:59:18 + | | @@ -1725,7 +1725,10 @@ | | p | | It

Re: Clarify rationale for ‘debian/rules ’ shebang line

2009-10-31 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Ben Finney | === modified file 'policy.sgml' | --- policy.sgml 2009-10-21 20:49:37 + | +++ policy.sgml 2009-10-31 00:59:18 + | @@ -1725,7 +1725,10 @@ | p | It must start with the line tt#!/usr/bin/make -f/tt, This should probably also be changed to allow «#!

Re: Clarify rationale for ‘ debian/rules’ shebang line

2009-10-31 Thread Peter Samuelson
| === modified file 'policy.sgml' | --- policy.sgml 2009-10-21 20:49:37 + | +++ policy.sgml 2009-10-31 00:59:18 + | @@ -1725,7 +1725,10 @@ | p | It must start with the line tt#!/usr/bin/make -f/tt, [Tollef Fog Heen] This should probably also be changed to allow

Clarify rationale for ‘debian/rules’ shebang line (was: debian/rules make -f restriction)

2009-10-30 Thread Ben Finney
surprise. Rather than a new rule, I submit this patch to clarify the existing rule for the shebang line. === modified file 'policy.sgml' --- policy.sgml 2009-10-21 20:49:37 + +++ policy.sgml 2009-10-31 00:59:18 + @@ -1725,7 +1725,10 @@ p It must start with the line tt#!/usr

Re: Clarify rationale for ‘debian/rules ’ shebang line

2009-10-30 Thread Ben Finney
reproducibility, and conform to the principle of least surprise. Rather than a new rule, I submit this patch to clarify the existing rule for the shebang line. I was sloppy in my use of normative language; this is a “must” directive. === modified file 'policy.sgml' --- policy.sgml 2009-10-21 20:49:37

Re: Clarify rationale for ‘debian/rules ’ shebang line

2009-10-30 Thread Manoj Srivastava
, to prevent confusion, and to promote reproducibility, and conform to the principle of least surprise. Rather than a new rule, I submit this patch to clarify the existing rule for the shebang line. I was sloppy in my use of normative language; this is a “must” directive. === modified file