On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 11:32:04PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
DNSBL's and spamassasin seem quite good at dealing with spam and are much
less annoying. That combined with some new laws that are being enacted to
combat spam should keep it to a managable level.
oh, please tell me that these new
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 06:56, david nicol wrote:
Unlike TMDA's distributed profusion of extended addresses, a
central RAPNAP (return address, peer network address pair) database
only needs to send out a challenge when you change your outgoing
SMTP server. In effect, a central server
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 08:32, Russell Coker wrote:
Here's how it works. Spammer creates account [EMAIL PROTECTED] and sends
their first spam to a C-R system, when the challenge comes in they
acknowledge it and from then on the C-R system does not bother them because
they keep using the
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 06:02:07PM -0500, david nicol wrote:
Don't hate spammers, figure out a way to bill them. They are in
business, they pay for things, they expect to be billed. Everyone
who has considered sender-pays agrees that it provides a better solution
than legislation.
Again
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 18:32, david nicol wrote:
I've been trying to popularize a centralized challenge-response
database since last fall. It seems to me that becoming a debian
package maintainer for the software to use it would make sense.
Unlike TMDA's distributed profusion of extended
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 00:16, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 18:32, david nicol wrote:
I've been trying to popularize a centralized challenge-response
database since last fall. It seems to me that becoming a debian
package maintainer for the software to use it would make sense.
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 03:56:16PM -0500, david nicol wrote:
For challenge response to work it has to be annoying to lots of people.
Anything that stops it being annoying will stop it working. That's why
it is broken.
Challenge-response, BY ITSELF ONLY, suffers from that problem. When
Hello
I've been trying to popularize a centralized challenge-response
database since last fall. It seems to me that becoming a debian
package maintainer for the software to use it would make sense.
Unlike TMDA's distributed profusion of extended addresses, a
central RAPNAP (return address,
8 matches
Mail list logo
