On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 17:15 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
So it seems that this is only going to be an issue if users take the
unusual step of changing /etc/fstab to refer to LVs by UUID. But
maybe there are management tools that do that as a matter of course?
I vaguely recall the occasion
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 15:46 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 08/04/13 13:53, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On 08-04-13 08:53, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I'm not suggesting that squeeze systems were installed that way by
default, although people who have migrated an FS from a raw partition
to an LV may
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/04/13 18:15, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 16:19 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 07/04/13 15:47, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:25:43 +0200 Daniel Pocock
dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
I notice this bug was
On 04/07/2013 10:46 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
The only reason to escalate the issue to
debian-devel is because you're trying to overrule the maintainers.
Once more, I'd say... :/
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On 08-04-13 08:53, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I'm not suggesting that squeeze systems were installed that way by
default, although people who have migrated an FS from a raw partition
to an LV may have this in fstab.
And that fact alone makes it a non-RC bug -- if it's even a bug at all.
Changing
On 08/04/13 13:53, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On 08-04-13 08:53, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I'm not suggesting that squeeze systems were installed that way by
default, although people who have migrated an FS from a raw partition
to an LV may have this in fstab.
And that fact alone makes it a non-RC bug
I notice this bug was downgraded below the RC threshold and appears to
have been missed so far:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612402
Basically, if somebody has UUID syntax in /etc/fstab, their root FS
isn't mounted and they can't boot
Patches are included, should this be
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:25:43 +0200
Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
I notice this bug was downgraded below the RC threshold and appears to
have been missed so far:
It was only pushed to RC status by your request and then almost
immediately moved back to original severity of Important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/04/13 15:47, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:25:43 +0200 Daniel Pocock
dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
I notice this bug was downgraded below the RC threshold and
appears to have been missed so far:
It was only pushed to RC
On 04/07/2013 10:19 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 07/04/13 15:47, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:25:43 +0200 Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au
wrote:
I notice this bug was downgraded below the RC threshold and appears to
have been missed so far:
It was only pushed to RC status
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 16:19:15 +0200
Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
On 07/04/13 15:47, Neil Williams wrote:
It was only pushed to RC status by your request and then almost
immediately moved back to original severity of Important by one of
the maintainers.
It is up to the
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 04:19:15PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/04/13 15:47, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:25:43 +0200 Daniel Pocock
dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
I notice this bug was downgraded below the RC threshold
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net (07/04/2013):
UUIDs are used by default AFAICS when the installer creates the
fstab, and should work just fine. Just looking and I don't have
an example system which uses UUIDs /and/ LVM root, however--this
does not appear to be the default for LVM. While
On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 16:19 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 07/04/13 15:47, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:25:43 +0200 Daniel Pocock
dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
I notice this bug was downgraded below the RC threshold and
appears to have been missed so far:
It was only
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 04:01:25PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
UUIDs are used by default AFAICS when the installer creates the
fstab, and should work just fine. Just looking and I don't have
an example system which uses UUIDs /and/ LVM root, however--this
does not appear to be the default for
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013, Ben Hutchings wrote:
So it seems that this is only going to be an issue if users take the
unusual step of changing /etc/fstab to refer to LVs by UUID. But maybe
there are management tools that do that as a matter of course?
One should never use UUIDs in fstab to refer to
16 matches
Mail list logo
