Daniel Stone wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:21:58PM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
Adding readline support, while you're at it, would be really nice:-)
And alias quit to exit. :)
type.exit.you.dolt A 127.0.0.1
quitIN CNAME
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:21:58PM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
Adding readline support, while you're at it, would be really nice:-)
And alias quit to exit. :)
-d, who now uses dig
--
Daniel Stone
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue 01 May 2001, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Apr 28, Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, but who have choose that nslookup is deprecated in favour of the
other two tools ?
The people who wrote BIND and developed a very large part of the DNS
infrastructure, the group of people
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 01:27:56PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Tue 01 May 2001, Marco d'Itri wrote:
nslookup is broken, please let it die its long-deserved death.
What's broken about it, apart from the brokenness that's in the current
version about the verbose warnings and missing
On Wed, 2 May 2001 13:39:17 +0200, Gerrit Pape wrote:
See http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/faq/tinydns.html#nslookup f.e.
djbdns? you really mean it?
*brrzzzap*
Suprise, you're dead. [1]
EOT anyone? [2]
Regards,
Alexander
[1] I happen to like that song...
[2] Mutt has scoring abilities, right? djb sux,
On May 02, Alexander Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2001 13:39:17 +0200, Gerrit Pape wrote:
See http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/faq/tinydns.html#nslookup f.e.
djbdns? you really mean it?
Actually this is one of the few things about which DJB is right.
--
ciao,
Marco
On May 02, Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That looks like a requirement to remove a few lines of code, rather
than to retire the whole program. So what else is wrong with it?
The fact it hides important debugging information should be enough,
but if you need other arguments please
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 02:30:21PM +, Alexander Koch wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2001 13:39:17 +0200, Gerrit Pape wrote:
See http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/faq/tinydns.html#nslookup f.e.
djbdns? you really mean it?
yes.
*brrzzzap*
[2] Mutt has scoring abilities, right? djb sux, so... thanks
for
from the secret journal of Gerrit Pape ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
What makes you reacting so blind and childish? This is not the topic of this
thread, just notice that there are debian people running djbdns - relaxed,
bind-free. Not having real djbdns (+co) packages in debian is a pity.
Adding readline support, while you're at it, would be really nice:-)
It isn't readline, but check out the nslookup function that comes with zsh.
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:02:33PM -0400, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
Closed-source software is even more of a pity. DJB's license (or lack there
of) makes it impossible to distribute binaries that aren't compiled by DJB
himself.
i certainly hope you speak out of ignorance, i would hate to think that
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:02:33PM -0400, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
Closed-source software is even more of a pity. DJB's license (or lack there
of) makes it impossible to distribute binaries that aren't compiled by DJB
himself.
i certainly hope
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:02:33PM -0400, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
from the secret journal of Gerrit Pape ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
What makes you reacting so blind and childish? This is not the topic of this
thread, just notice that there are debian people running djbdns - relaxed,
bind-free. Not
from the secret journal of Gerrit Pape ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:02:33PM -0400, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
from the secret journal of Gerrit Pape ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
What makes you reacting so blind and childish? This is not the topic of
this
thread, just notice that
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:37:33PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You may distribute a precompiled package if
o installing your package produces exactly the same files, in
exactly the same locations, that a user would obtain by
from the secret journal of Jacob Kuntz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Closed may have been the wrong word. Non-free would have been more
accurate. You can study DJB's code all you want, but not your own binaries
^
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 09:52:04PM +0200, Gerrit Pape wrote:
Not having real djbdns (+co) packages in debian is a pity.
As the maintainer of the djbdns-installer package, I feel obliged to mention
that there are quite a few people using this package and they are quite happy
with it. It requires
from the secret journal of John H. Robinson, IV ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
it says ``that a user would obtain by installing''SO this means: on
(say) a Debian 2.1 system, if a user were to get the tarbal, and compile
it against the default libs, as per the instructions, and install as per
the
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it says ``that a user would obtain by installing''
Sorry, I thought he was referring to binary packages above.
--
Alan Shutko [EMAIL PROTECTED] - In a variety of flavors!
Well, Jim, I'm not much of an actor either.
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:56:28PM -0400, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
from the secret journal of Gerrit Pape ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Closed may have been the wrong word. Non-free would have been more
accurate. You can study DJB's code all you want, but not your own
binaries or modified source.
again,
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 05:13:08PM -0400, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
from the secret journal of John H. Robinson, IV ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I'm not sure if this has come up before, but since DJB likes to install in
/var, wouldn't any Debian package fail the policy check?
that is just qmail and the
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 05:13:08PM -0400, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
from the secret journal of John H. Robinson, IV ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
it says ``that a user would obtain by installing''SO this means: on
(say) a Debian 2.1 system, if a user were to get the tarbal, and compile
it against the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Enough said. Fuck him.
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Gerrit Pape wrote:
http://cr.yp.to/distributors.html
- --
Sacred cows make the best burgers
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!!!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP for Personal
On Apr 28, Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, but who have choose that nslookup is deprecated in favour of the
other two tools ?
The people who wrote BIND and developed a very large part of the DNS
infrastructure, the group of people who knows about DNS more than most
other people
Since about a month, seems to me that I have to use dig and I feel this
situation as an imposition.
First, the nslookup start message says that nslookup is 'deprecated' and
tell me to use dig or host instead.
If I don't want to see this message I have to use -silent option ...
OK, but who have
Previously Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
OK, but who have choose that nslookup is deprecated in favour of the
other two tools ?
It's authors.
Why we have to remove nsllokup from debian ?
You are free to take an old bind source and create a nslookup package
based on those.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Previously Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
OK, but who have choose that nslookup is deprecated in favour of
the other two tools ?
It's authors.
Why we have to remove nsllokup from debian ?
You are free to take an old bind source and create a
27 matches
Mail list logo
