Package: dvipsk
Version: 5.58f-3
Package: dvipsk
Recommends: psfonts
However, no psfonts package appears to be available.
Looks like it should recommend 'texpsfnt'.
Ray
--
LOGIC The principle governing human intellection. Its nature may be deduced
from examining the two following
Hi all,
I had a slightly corrupted profile for root yesterday in which the
path wasn't set for the sbin directory's (/sbin, /usr/sbin). Because
of this an `ldconfig' command from some {pre,post}{inst,rm} script
wasn't succesfull. Can we solve this?
Adding the path for the command to be
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 1995 11:06:00 -0500
From: brian (b.c.) white [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New Packages-Master
I noticed that the Packages-Master file now has a filename: field.
I'm curious about what will happen when (if?) you create seperate
directories for
Ian Jackson writes:
Ian Why can't we just stick with `doc' containing both sets of
Ian documentation ? Is there any point in splitting the package up ?
Having two packages permits the user to select the one she wants. There might
be people who can live without the HOWTOs or the Debian
Package: linuxdoc-sgml
Version: 1.2-2
The /usr/doc/linuxdoc-sgml/guide.* files are from version 1.1.
See: guide.sgml:
This guide documents
Linuxdoc-SGML version 1.1.
I suggest the package is upgraded to version 1.4.
Thanks.
Guido Witmond -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PGP 2.6.2i
[Reminder: ld fails when gcc is used with both -g and -lm flags]
I'm surprised no one else is complaining about this bug since it
really hinders software development under Debian.
For anyone who is interested, one solution is just to install the
experimental elf-gcc package. This one works
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] daid, regarding doclinux and docdebian:
Why can't we just stick with `doc' containing both sets of
documentation ? Is there any point in splitting the package up ?
I like the idea of separate docs collections for vanilla linux
and for incremental debian issues
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes [SuperCite undone]:
Ian Jackson writes, answering a question of mine:
No. I suppose I'm suggesting that the browser packages use a shared
file like /etc/default-www-home or something, in much the same way as
other packages use /etc/mailname, /etc/news/server and
8 matches
Mail list logo
