On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 03:54:02AM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
Bonjour a tous,
Je ne sais pas trop si c est le bon endroit pour poster ce message mais
je n en vois pas d autre.
Voila je cherche un developpeur Debian pour signer ma cle GPG.
Et je cherche cet animal rare dans la region
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 11:14:33AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
Voila je cherche un developpeur Debian pour signer ma cle GPG.
Et je cherche cet animal rare dans la region toulousaine de preference.
Je suis disponible pour une signature. Tu peux donc me contacter.
Salut, j'emménage à
[snip]
Et je cherche cet animal rare dans la region
toulousaine de preference.
Je suis disponible pour une signature. Tu peux donc
me contacter.
Salut, j'emménage à Toulouse dans 2 semaines. Si ta
clé n'est toujours pas signée, tu n'auras qu'à me
contacter.
Si vous organisez une petite
Nicolas Bertolissio wrote:
Bonjour,
Je suis en train de répondre aux questions de mon responsable de
candidature. Et je bloque un peu sur deux questions, similaires donc je
n'en exposerai qu'une seule ici:
10. What does version 3.4-2.1 mean?
upsteam version is 3.4
maintainer version is 2
NMU
Salut,
Je suis en train d'empaqueter DJGPP, qui comme chacun sait est une
version de GCC pour DOS. Pour être plus precis, c'est une libc spéciale
et une architecture cible du toolchain GNU.
J'ai trois paquets source :
- (gcc|binutils)-i386-msdosdjgpp : paquets crées avec
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:01:31PM -0500, Taral wrote:
Looks like the python2.2 stuff migrated into testing without noticing
that it breaks python-apt. Anyone using python-apt (e.g. aptitude users)
are advised not to upgrade.
Huh? What's aptitude got to do with python-apt?
Package: aptitude
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:01:31PM -0500, Taral wrote:
Looks like the python2.2 stuff migrated into testing without noticing
that it breaks python-apt. Anyone using python-apt (e.g. aptitude users)
are advised not to upgrade.
Anyone know how exactly the testing scripts managed to miss this
Huh? What's aptitude got to do with python-apt?
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.2.11.1-3
Depends: libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2-3.2, libc6 (= 2.2.4-4), libncurses5 (=
5.2.20020112a-1), libsigc++0, libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 (= 1:2.95.4-0.010810)
Okay, I feel like an idiot. It's supposed to be
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 11:29:14PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:01:31PM -0500, Taral wrote:
Looks like the python2.2 stuff migrated into testing without noticing
that it breaks python-apt. Anyone using python-apt (e.g. aptitude users)
are advised not to upgrade.
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?
If we're doing let's have a conf where we normally don't how about we
have it on the US's east coast aswell. I'd personally argue for the
nothern Virginia are myself.
Too many conferences
On Sun, 18 May 2003, Denis Barbier wrote:
[All Cc's removed]
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 07:54:55AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
[...]
I don't believe that there is not an estestic layout that can satisfy
all the languages we have in Debian.
What is the rationale for having a single
* Aaron M. Ucko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030519 04:26]:
* As mentioned, we have an enthusiastic sponsor lined up, which is a
definite plus.
What do we get from that sponsor? Conference rooms, network, accomodation,
food, flights and tshirts?
On Sat, 17 May 2003, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
It's strange, because on my i386 system
objdump -T /usr/lib/libgdk-X11-2.0.so gives
0002e71c gDF .text 0049 Base_gdk_display_x11_get_type
00045ebc gDF .text 014c Base_gdk_windowing_window_init
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 10:02:18PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2003, Keegan Quinn wrote:
On Friday 16 May 2003 11:45 am, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2003, Keegan Quinn wrote:
more than once i had to install small dns servers on boxes with less
Hello,
I repost this because I got no feedback at all. I guess it shows that my
email was long enough for not being read :)
Thanks, Mt.
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:29:00PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
In order to help the current discution to find an usefull conclusion, I
would like to
On Mon, 19 May 2003, Martin Quinson wrote:
I repost this because I got no feedback at all. I guess it shows that my
email was long enough for not being read :)
Or there is no other comment from my side than: Go for it! It is an important
topic!
Kind regards
Andreas.
Hello
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 04:52:54PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
*SNIP*
Removing one kernel version and including another without rebuilding
all modules packages will break several installations. Not removing
the old packages will make the archive grow through time which will
cause
As previously mentioned on this list, where I work, we have a sizeable
chunk of infrastructure that can't connect out to a Debian mirror[1]
One of my colleages has written a script, which works on the
/var/lib/dpkg/status file on a host that may require updating comparing it
against the
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 06:28:19PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
This would be made easier if the DSA's were obtainable in a more parseable
format. Currently they're being retrieved from
http://www.debian.org/security/ via a recursive wget.
Perhaps CVS would be easier?
:pserver:[EMAIL
Hi,
Could you please help me to find the website from
where I am able to download steambox ripper.
Thanks,
Reda.
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 09:30:52AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2003, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
It's strange, because on my i386 system
objdump -T /usr/lib/libgdk-X11-2.0.so gives
0002e71c gDF .text 0049 Base_gdk_display_x11_get_type
00045ebc g
* Aaron M. Ucko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?
I'm all for it, and GWU would be most excellent in my view. Of course,
I live just outside DC... ;)
Stephen
pgpSnD1TuI4Jx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 19 May 2003 18:28:19 +1000
AP == Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AP
AP
AP This would be made easier if the DSA's were obtainable in a more parseable
AP format.
DSA'a are available in RDF. There exists a link on the bottom of
www.debian.org/security to it.
--
Alexander
Hello Debian-devel, hello Takuo,
I patched Evolution 1.2.4 to be able to send attachments with a mailto:;
URL. Simply use
evolution 'mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
subject=attachmentbody=Hello%20listattach=/path/to/file'
Please note that this functionality is enclosed in Evolution 1.3
From: Agustin Martin Domingo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ITP: latex209 -- macro files of LaTeX 2.09 25-mar-1992 version
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 13:50:39 +0200
I am cc'ing this message to the debian-tetex-maint list. I think they
would also like to know about this and will have a much better
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:01:31PM -0500, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard
to say:
Looks like the python2.2 stuff migrated into testing without noticing
that it breaks python-apt. Anyone using python-apt (e.g. aptitude users)
are advised not to upgrade.
aptitude has nothing to do with
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 06:55:37PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
Highly technical packages like zebra, netfilter-related stuff and
linux-atm are most likely to be used by people who know English. Not
speaking English will make running routers and/or internet security
systems almost impossible
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:02:58AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
I'll start here:
Kernel package policy:
kernel image to avoid confusion between kernel source, kernel headers,
kernel modules, etc.
--
* It should only exist one kernel-source package.
* Every
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:38:47AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
The main problem here is support. If uses e2fsck with NLS support
enabled, and with a non-US locale, the messages will come out in their
native language. Which is all very well-and-good until they run into
problems and they
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 11:06:16AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Kernel module policy:
-
* Kernel modules must be provided as a binary source package.
* Module source packages should provide a debian/rules file.
* The debian/rules file must compile the module if
Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kernel module policy:
-
* Kernel modules must be provided as a binary source package.
* Module source packages should provide a debian/rules file.
* The debian/rules file must compile the module if KSRC=kernelsourcedir
and
Hello
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 11:06:16AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:02:58AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
I'll start here:
Kernel package policy:
kernel image to avoid confusion between kernel source, kernel headers,
Agreed.
kernel modules, etc.
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 09:06:20PM +1000, RedaComputer wrote:
Could you please help me to find the website from where I am able to
download steambox ripper.
No, sorry - I'm afraid we'll first have to complete our search for the
sheets of dueling banjos before we can work on your request.
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 04:19:31PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
No, sorry - I'm afraid we'll first have to complete our search for the
sheets of ...that which shall not be named... before we can work on
your request.
Do you realize that every time this is mentioned in the list archives, it
[CC to debian-devel, did anybody see this behaviour on an update?]
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes:
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 04:52:51PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Never seen this upgrade behaviour. Was libgcc1 installed before
libstdc++5? If not, please could you explictely install
Josip Rodin wrote:
Well, yeah, sure, but the highway analogy doesn't apply. There isn't a
single technical reason why I as a random person need to ever be in any
sort of contact with a spammer to keep the system running.
There was no mention of spammers in the thread! While they are prone to
Emile van Bergen wrote
I also don't understand the phrase today's Internet world. You mean
with the hordes running Outlook and shopping on the clickable amazing
discoveries / quantum shopping / tell sell channel that's the WWW?
Yes. If you have to interact with them to any great extent then its
Hello,
I saw stunnel has not been uploaded since december 2001, so unstable
version
of stunnel is very old.
I use stunnel on all my computers, and I would like to take over the
package.
Is there any objection ? ( I sent a mail to current maintainer Paolo
Molaro
[EMAIL
Hi,
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 07:14:07PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
Josip Rodin wrote:
Well, yeah, sure, but the highway analogy doesn't apply. There isn't a
single technical reason why I as a random person need to ever be in any
sort of contact with a spammer to keep the system running.
Hello
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 12:43:02PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kernel module policy:
-
* Kernel modules must be provided as a binary source package.
* Module source packages should provide a debian/rules file.
* The
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-19
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: openoffice.org-thesaurus-de
Version : 20030512
Upstream Author : Daniel Naber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://thesaurus.kdenews.org/lang.php?lang=en
* License : GPL
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 07:14:07PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
Well, yeah, sure, but the highway analogy doesn't apply. There isn't a
single technical reason why I as a random person need to ever be in any
sort of contact with a spammer to keep the system running.
There was no mention of
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:17:40PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
(I'd quote a proverb about how small things lead to big things, but I
can't currently think of any of those in English. :)
Look after the pennies and the pounds will take care of themselves.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
reopen 193287
reopen 193286
thanks
Marco Presi (Zufus) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 20:30:39 +0200
Source: pointless
Binary: pointless
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marco Presi (Zufus) [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Brian Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 1:05 AM
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?
If we're doing let's have a conf where we normally
p.s. the version of python 2.2 is back at 2.2.1 compiled with gcc 2.95.4
(stable version)
the version that got into trouble was the python 2.2 that was compiled
with gcc 3.2 (unstable latest version?)
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 07:40:06PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
[CC to debian-devel, did
On 19-May-03, 11:03 (CDT), Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The VMS-style error codes occurred to me as well. Though if one goes
that route, I wonder if gettext any longer has advantages over msgcat.
:)
I realize you're being (at least somewhat) facetious, but if you
start with a
Matt Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sending HTML emails its a general comment on people usage of the Internet.
If you can limit yourself to contacts who are technical enough to understand
the arguments why you don't like it then you can maintain the pretence that
it doesn't exist. Those who
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 04:25:20PM +0400, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2003 18:28:19 +1000
AP == Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AP
AP
AP This would be made easier if the DSA's were obtainable in a more
parseable
AP format.
DSA'a are available in RDF. There
Gunnar Wolf dijo:
A ver... Prefiero traer esto acá, entre cuates, antes de pasarlo al
foro grandote. ¿Se lo enviamos a debian-legal? ¿Hay algo que se pueda
hacer al respecto? ¿Algún chileno a la mano, ocnocen la política de
resolución de disputas en .cl?
Yo después de lo de hispalinux.com
Amaya dijo [Mon, May 19, 2003 at 03:55:32PM +0200]:
A ver... Prefiero traer esto acá, entre cuates, antes de pasarlo al
foro grandote. ¿Se lo enviamos a debian-legal? ¿Hay algo que se pueda
hacer al respecto? ¿Algún chileno a la mano, ocnocen la política de
resolución de disputas en .cl?
Gunnar Wolf dijo:
A ver... Prefiero traer esto acá, entre cuates, antes de pasarlo al
foro grandote. ¿Se lo enviamos a debian-legal? ¿Hay algo que se pueda
hacer al respecto? ¿Algún chileno a la mano, ocnocen la política de
resolución de disputas en .cl?
La reglamentacion de NIC Chile esta en
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 07:53:05PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
A ver... Prefiero traer esto acá, entre cuates, antes de pasarlo al foro
grandote. ¿Se lo enviamos a debian-legal? ¿Hay algo que se pueda hacer
al respecto? ¿Algún chileno a la mano, ocnocen la política de resolución
de disputas en
53 matches
Mail list logo
