Re: VI reasons (was Re: Base Set: Suggested additions removals.)

1998-06-16 Thread Craig Sanders
crap. Perhaps much of this discussion could be solved if ae managed vi keybindings a little better. Martin. P.S. This test was using ae version 962-20. -- craig sanders -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: Release management - technical

1998-06-22 Thread Craig Sanders
of sendmail, smail, etc so that mail can be delivered for users who only exist in a radius or LDAP directory and not in /etc/passwd. craig -- craig sanders -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: libc6_2.0.7 release notes...

1998-06-23 Thread Craig Sanders
for all pre-release packages? In the mean time, unless anyone can object within the next several hours, I will construct and upload a new release of glibc with the version number: 2.0.7r-1 cool, that'll solve the immediate problem. craig -- craig sanders -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: libc6_2.0.7 release notes...

1998-06-23 Thread Craig Sanders
On Tue, 23 Jun 1998, Philip Hands wrote: Yann Dirson wrote: Craig Sanders writes: how about using 2.07pre8-1, 2.07pre8-2, and so on for the next set of glibc pre-releases? Seems like it doesn't work: $ dpkg --compare-versions 2.07pre8-1 '' 2.0.8 echo yes || echo no no You

Re: libc6_2.0.7 release notes...

1998-06-25 Thread Craig Sanders
, this is a bug in dpkg, and should be fixed. but the problem exists now, and if dpkg's revision history is anything to go by will continue to exist for a long long time. craig -- craig sanders -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug #23877: Include autoup.sh and apt in hamm/hamm

1998-06-26 Thread Craig Sanders
this directory should also be populated with symlinks to all the packages which autoup.sh needs to do the upgrade. there should also be a copy of the the bo libc5 dpkg in there, to assist with upgrades from rex/buzz. craig -- craig sanders -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: dpkg -S problem

1998-10-03 Thread Craig Sanders
. fi ;; *) locate -d /var/lib/dlocate/dlocatedb $* ;; esac ---cut here---/usr/bin/dlocate---cut here--- craig -- craig sanders

Re: what's after slink

1998-10-04 Thread Craig Sanders
, etc. craig -- craig sanders

Re: CD images of Slink

1998-10-06 Thread Craig Sanders
/binary-i386/tex 41465 main/binary-i386/math 45991 main/binary-i386/text 69621 main/binary-i386/editors 70242 main/binary-i386/x11 82342 main/binary-i386/doc 172210 main/binary-i386/devel 769520 total craig -- craig sanders

Re: Squid2, how to handle incompatible upgrade

1998-10-08 Thread Craig Sanders
as well. sounds good to me. btw, i'm already using your squid 1.2-beta23-1 package on several machines. works well. craig -- craig sanders

Re: I2O specs mailed to webmaster

1998-10-08 Thread Craig Sanders
belive this psec should be open. This is part #1 due to max. 1000k attachment using hot-mail. Best regards Free software lowers looks like good intentions, legally questionable, and bad spelling :-) craig -- craig sanders

Re: LICENSES [was: Re: Have you seen this?]

1998-10-10 Thread Craig Sanders
speaking for myself, not debian. craig -- craig sanders

Re: LICENSES [was: Re: Have you seen this?]

1998-10-10 Thread Craig Sanders
On 10 Oct 1998, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] the GPL explicitly makes an exception for libraries which are included with the operating system itself. Not quite so - it makes an exception for binaries that are NOT included with that operating system itself

Re: Debian logo

1998-10-10 Thread Craig Sanders
mean.) something based on that would be great. craig -- craig sanders

Re: LICENSES [was: Re: Have you seen this?]

1998-10-10 Thread Craig Sanders
On Fri, 9 Oct 1998, Steve Lamb wrote: On Sat, 10 Oct 1998 11:33:15 +1000 (EST), Craig Sanders wrote: the last sentence, from However, as a special exception is particularly relevant here. So, if Qt were disttributed with the OS then it would fall under the special exception? :) yes

Re: LICENSES [was: Re: Have you seen this?]

1998-10-10 Thread Craig Sanders
permission they seek to distribute the KDE software. craig -- craig sanders

Re: LICENSES [was: Re: Have you seen this?]

1998-10-10 Thread Craig Sanders
On 10 Oct 1998, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you link a GPL-ed program and Qt, you are creating a work which is derived from both. Since Qt's license is incompatible with the GPL as far as distribution goes, you may not distribute that derived work without

Re: LICENSES [was: Re: Have you seen this?]

1998-10-10 Thread Craig Sanders
have to chase this one around? this hair-splitting is just a distraction from the real question. see previous messages for details. craig -- craig sanders

Re: KDE gone, Lyx next ?

1998-10-10 Thread Craig Sanders
. if they ignore the request or choose not to change their license then we have to yank the software. craig -- craig sanders

Re: LICENSES [was: Re: Have you seen this?]

1998-10-10 Thread Craig Sanders
On Fri, 9 Oct 1998, Joseph Carter wrote: On Sat, Oct 10, 1998 at 12:35:31PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: non-free license. Neither I, nor anyone sensible, has any argument with TT's license...it's their software, they can do what they like with it.) That doesn't mean everyone else ise

Re: Bad signature!! [was: Re: LICENSES]

1998-10-10 Thread Craig Sanders
and what the contents were when it was signed? i wrote the message, but i didn't sign it. i don't normally sign my email. i'll sign this one though :-) craig - -- craig sanders -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: noconv

Re: Bad signature!! [was: Re: LICENSES]

1998-10-10 Thread Craig Sanders
actualy sent this message and what the contents were when it was signed? Craig Sanders does not routinely sign his mail. Joseph Carter does. Upon closer examination, one will find that the PGP/MIME signature from Joseph Carter's previous message got attached to Craig Sanders' reply

Re: KDE gone, Lyx next ?

1998-10-11 Thread Craig Sanders
system? sounds a bit far-fetched to me. :-) craig -- craig sanders

Re: KDE gone, Lyx next ?

1998-10-11 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Raul Miller wrote: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no, the modifications to the source are fine. the GPL does not in any way restrict the kinds of modifications you can make to GPL-ed source code. You have the source, you can do what you want

Re: LICENSES [was: Re: Have you seen this?]

1998-10-12 Thread Craig Sanders
, so s/libc/libFOO/ in my first paragraph above. craig -- craig sanders

Re: [ettrich@troll.no: Re: copyright problem]

1998-10-12 Thread Craig Sanders
and binary forms. This permission certainly includes linking against GUI toolkits like XForms, Motif, GTK, Qt or Win32. If that is still ok for Debian, I could live with it. Michael? - End forwarded message - craig -- craig sanders

Re: KDE gone, Lyx next ?

1998-10-13 Thread Craig Sanders
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Raul Miller wrote: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: there is no combined work until the source is compiled, linked to the non-free library, and a binary produced. Please show me where the GPL says this. I'm tired of pointing out this is false, quoting from

Re: KDE gone, Lyx next ?

1998-10-13 Thread Craig Sanders
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Raul Miller wrote: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: similarly, i am tired of pointing out the errors in your misinterpretation of the GPL. Er... could you at least back up your assertions with quotes from the GPL which support your position? i have done so

login time limits in slink???

1998-10-14 Thread Craig Sanders
. craig -- craig sanders

Re: login time limits in slink???

1998-10-15 Thread Craig Sanders
On 15 Oct 1998, Paul Crowley wrote: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: anyone know what it is in slink which is enforcing idle-timeout and daily time limits on serial lines? I don't have this problem, and I haven't installed idled: Description: Idle Daemon. Removes idle users

Re: Removing Gnome [was: Removing Packages in Slink for Debian 2.1]

1998-10-16 Thread Craig Sanders
upstream if it makes sense to do so). craig -- craig sanders

Re: login time limits in slink???

1998-10-18 Thread Craig Sanders
-logout functionality. nope. i create all new accounts with bash (*csh sucks). the problem also occurs with ppp logins - in fact, that was how the problem was noticed. craig -- craig sanders

Re: login time limits in slink???

1998-10-18 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 10:03:30AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: nope. i create all new accounts with bash (*csh sucks). the problem also occurs with ppp logins - in fact, that was how the problem was noticed. perhaps cpu seconds limit enforced

Re: login time limits in slink???

1998-10-18 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 11:30:26AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: nope. the messages printed are specifically mentioning either 1) that the idle timeout has been exceeded, or 2) that the daily time limit has been exceeded. Only on serial lines

Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free -- non-dfsg)

1999-01-20 Thread Craig Sanders
heresies so that all can see at a glance what kind of perversion the branded one will try to lead them into. btw, if you think that paragraph needed a smilie then you need to get out more and relax a bit. craig -- craig sanders

Re: non-free -- non-dfsg

1999-01-20 Thread Craig Sanders
and enthusiastic adoption of the Open Source Definition, which is the DFSG with debian references stripped out), that is also irrelevant... neither software authors, nor users, nor the communities, nor anyone except debian developers get a vote when it comes to debian's policies. nor should they. -- craig

Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free -- non-dfsg)

1999-01-20 Thread Craig Sanders
for or against...it is not counted at all. craig ps: debian-devel isn't a philosophy debating society. -- craig sanders

Re: Dpkg Update Proposal

1999-01-22 Thread Craig Sanders
of it's own accord. in the meantime, we can live with a few extra packages in our unstable dist. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Intent to package rolldice, blackjack

1999-01-22 Thread Craig Sanders
from the early 90s :-) and mail them to you. i'll GPL them first, so you can do what you want with them. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Dpkg Update Proposal

1999-01-22 Thread Craig Sanders
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 12:02:55AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: Craig Sanders wrote: i agree. in fact, it's more like a solution searching for a problem than even a superficial problem. It's a problem that is only evident to people who haven't lived with it for years. That doesn't mean it's

Re: Debian goes big business?

1999-01-22 Thread Craig Sanders
in some work CAN join up as developers. i started that way a few years ago, and i'll bet that most debian developers did too. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Dpkg Update Proposal

1999-01-23 Thread Craig Sanders
is a job for an informed and alert mind. a trained chimp can fake it for a while, but will come unstuck when anything 'unusual' happensit's far better for the MCSE genes to be discovered sooner rather than later. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Debian goes big business?

1999-01-23 Thread Craig Sanders
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 10:38:54AM +0100, J.H.M. Dassen wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 20:26:12 +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: i mostly agree but wouldn't put it anywhere near that strongly. I would. Ben's phrasing strongly reminds me of Robert A. Heinlein; especially of the concept

Re: No intend to package vbox

1999-01-23 Thread Craig Sanders
...there may be useful ideas in there for you. you want me to submit a real bug report or is this message enough to get it added to your TODO list ? craig -- craig sanders

Re: Reality check! [was: Re: Debian goes big business?]

1999-01-25 Thread Craig Sanders
and only based on Debian. Don't get confused about it please. good. glad to hear it. i'd hate to see debian itself dumbed-down merely to serve a market which is already adequately catered for, at the expense of the technically-literate market. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Reality check! [was: Re: Debian goes big business?]

1999-01-25 Thread Craig Sanders
solution now would make it much more difficult (nearly impossible) to migrate to a good solution in the future. craig -- craig sanders

Re: cron has gone to UTC time?

1999-01-29 Thread Craig Sanders
restarted before xntp is restarted. it happened to me yesterday when i upgraded from xntp3 to the new ntp 4 package. easily fixed with /etc/init.d/{cron,syslogd} stop, followed by start. craig -- craig sanders

Re: WARNING: Re: debhelper /usr/bin/passwd

1999-01-31 Thread Craig Sanders
not working in unstable because some people have the mistaken belief that --force-overwrite should default to off. yes, you can override it on the dpkg command linebut there is no way to override it if you use dselect or apt. this is evil. craig -- craig sanders

Re: fearless sailtrip (aka the DPL goes on vacation)

1999-05-15 Thread Craig Sanders
the catherd's away??? :-) craig ps: i have no idea if catherd is a real word or not. by analogy to shepherd. -- craig sanders

Re: (LONG) Correct non-US solution

1999-05-19 Thread Craig Sanders
but patents exist to restrict usage or sale. craig -- craig sanders

VA and debian boxes (was Re: evan leibovitch and the LPI certification tests)

1999-05-20 Thread Craig Sanders
is a good option. their main co-lo facility is not far from VA Research, and they had debian installed and running very quickly after receiving the hardware from VA. craig -- craig sanders

Re: evan leibovitch and the LPI certification tests

1999-05-20 Thread Craig Sanders
or complement each other. sometimes they don't. They certainly don't conflict or harm each other. craig -- craig sanders

Re: (LONG) Correct non-US solution

1999-05-20 Thread Craig Sanders
to sue an individual for compiling and using free source code that implements their patented algorithms. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Time to rewrite dpkg

1999-05-20 Thread Craig Sanders
language, so C is the language of choice for general purpose libraries. for example: this, and related reasons, is why GNOME chose C rather than C++ as the base language for GNOME projects. Their decision was sound, and their reasons were sound. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Time to rewrite dpkg IN IDL! :)

1999-05-20 Thread Craig Sanders
On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 08:45:09PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: On Fri, May 21, 1999 at 12:27:32AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: C++ may be OO, but it's not very good OOand it tends to compile into code which is both bloated and slow. dpkg is already far too slow on old hardware

Re: Time to rewrite dpkg IN IDL! :)

1999-05-20 Thread Craig Sanders
of the thread now...it probably isn't worth reading if it's got down to this level. craig -- craig sanders

Re: evan leibovitch and the LPI certification tests

1999-05-21 Thread Craig Sanders
it. we're not here to get 100% market share, or 50% or even 20%. we're here to make the best system we can and share it amongst ourselves and with others, and also to encourage others to join in the effort. craig -- craig sanders

intent to orphan: spamdb

1999-05-21 Thread Craig Sanders
of SpamDomains and Spammers and SpamNets from my home web server makes my internet connection very slow for most of every Sunday) comments?? craig -- craig sanders

Re: An 'ae' testimony

1999-05-21 Thread Craig Sanders
-- craig sanders

Re: An 'ae' testimony

1999-05-22 Thread Craig Sanders
-- craig sanders

Re: An 'ae' testimony

1999-05-22 Thread Craig Sanders
On Fri, May 21, 1999 at 01:48:03PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: someone (miquel, perhaps) made elvis-tiny a year or two back, and it fit on the boot disk. would be nice if it could be made to fit again. elvis isn't as good as vim, but it's much better

Re: An 'ae' testimony

1999-05-22 Thread Craig Sanders
On Fri, May 21, 1999 at 06:01:26PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: vi - hard to use, but small. correction: hard to learn, easy to use. small, fast, and powerful. craig -- craig sanders

Re: An 'ae' testimony

1999-05-22 Thread Craig Sanders
is better than ae, no doubt about it. however if there's 50+K available on the rescue disk for ee it would be better to use that space for a decent minimal vi clone (elvis-tiny needs ~67K). craig -- craig sanders

Re: An 'ae' testimony

1999-05-23 Thread Craig Sanders
redefines many slcurses.h macros) but ran into a problem with elvis' qfaddch macro which requires more knowledge about curses than i currently have. craig -- craig sanders

Re: An 'ae' testimony

1999-05-23 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 07:54:57PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: On Sun, May 23, 1999 at 09:47:33AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: that extra 30k (if it is actually available on the rescue disk) would be better used either as part of the space needed by elvis-tiny (**) or by I still don't

Re: An 'ae' testimony

1999-05-23 Thread Craig Sanders
vi emulation. it may not be real vi, but it's infinitely better than nothing. If you want all of the stuff you commonly use on the boot disk, modify it yourself. Simple :) i don't want all the stuff i commonly use. i just want the bare minimum, and that includes a decent editor. craig -- craig

Re: An 'ae' testimony

1999-05-23 Thread Craig Sanders
perfect, it should not be removed until there is a replacement which can fit on the rescue disk. craig -- craig sanders

Re: An 'ae' testimony

1999-05-23 Thread Craig Sanders
shots like this. guess i was mistaken. craig -- craig sanders

Re: An 'ae' testimony

1999-05-23 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, May 23, 1999 at 02:40:48AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: and that includes a decent editor. That rules vi out, then. for politeness' sake i will interpret your remarks in the most positive light possible: you are mistaken. craig -- craig sanders

Re: An 'ae' testimony

1999-05-23 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, May 23, 1999 at 02:11:03AM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: On Sun, May 23, 1999 at 10:10:56AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: Are other editors really so difficult? yes. difficult and clumsy and lacking basic functionality. All that missing functionality in ee (and ae in normal mode

Re: How to handle the jargon file?

1999-05-26 Thread Craig Sanders
or whatever else from that? craig -- craig sanders

Re: demo vs. real package: FYI (was Re: Announcing debconf, configuration management for debian)

1999-09-19 Thread Craig Sanders
? craig -- craig sanders

Re: sash (was Re: demo vs. real package: FYI (was ...))

1999-09-19 Thread Craig Sanders
redesigned. On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 07:18:09AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: do they automatically set up sash as root's shell? They don't touch the root account. Instead, they clone it as sashroot and set the shell on the cloned account. cool. i was just checking that the discussion from

Re: anarchism_7.7-1.deb

1999-09-25 Thread Craig Sanders
the anarchist faq far more useful and interesting than (a bad translation of) religious texts. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Useless packages (was Re: anarchism_7.7-1.deb)

1999-09-25 Thread Craig Sanders
packages in the last release but not new ones in the current unstable). craig -- craig sanders

Re: anarchism_7.7-1.deb

1999-09-26 Thread Craig Sanders
of having specialty CDs then those who want them will be able to purchase them from specialty vendors or download the packages for free from the net. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-09-27 Thread Craig Sanders
it on everyone else. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Censoring :) (was: Re: anarchism_7.7-1.deb)

1999-09-27 Thread Craig Sanders
On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 11:46:19AM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: it's irrelevant whether other debian developers or users agree with me or disagree with me about the relative utility of these two packages. by not censoring packages, by refusing

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-09-28 Thread Craig Sanders
On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 03:21:34AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 01:05:58PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: then don't install those services. installing a package *IS* an explicit OK. You're saying that packages reliably say when they provide daemons? no, but it should

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-09-29 Thread Craig Sanders
majority who would be inconvenienced if the reverse were true. it looks to me like it's an either/or situation (i.e. no way of satisfying both parties at once - mutually exclusive needs) so it's a pretty easy choice to make...cause the minimum harm/hassle/inconvenience. craig -- craig sanders

Re: dhcp-dns problems

1999-09-29 Thread Craig Sanders
) -- craig sanders

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-09-29 Thread Craig Sanders
always choose when building systems because i prefer to select all packages. crai -- craig sanders

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-09-29 Thread Craig Sanders
. i'm not against increasing choice. the default should remain as is, though - those who want it different should be the ones who have to take whatever action with debconf. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-09-29 Thread Craig Sanders
of a daemon is a security problem then that config should be fixed or the package dropped from the distribution. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-09-29 Thread Craig Sanders
their personal preferences on everyone else by making loud noises about trumped up nebulous and vague security issues. it would be nicer if such FUD were left behind in the proprietary software world. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-09-30 Thread Craig Sanders
their setup but you risk that your custom mods will be blown away the next time someone runs the stupid GUI configurator). debian's attitude is: if you want something different, DIY. and more importantly, it lets you DIY. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-09-30 Thread Craig Sanders
is one. sun's Netra is another...both are examples of how NOT to do configuration management on unix. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-09-30 Thread Craig Sanders
-- craig sanders

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-09-30 Thread Craig Sanders
they are needed. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-10-01 Thread Craig Sanders
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 08:34:48AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 02:16:31PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: to paraphrase: i am against messing with the current default. i am not against (indeed, i am in favour of) increasing choice. There is currently no default

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-10-01 Thread Craig Sanders
their needs. other daemons, e.g. pop and imap, work with little or no configuration - install them and they start working immediately. it is useful to enable them at install time. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-10-01 Thread Craig Sanders
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 07:02:44AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 08:05:32AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: sorry, it's you who needs to wake up to the real world. if people don't know how to administer a unix machine then they need to learn fast. Not true. you

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-10-01 Thread Craig Sanders
, craig -- craig sanders

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-10-02 Thread Craig Sanders
to the maintainers of the pop packages (and other interested parties) to come up with a way that can be achieved without hassle, and without imposing stupid and onerous burdens on the maintainers of unrelated packages. craig -- craig sanders

Re: How not to be a nice person (Was: Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality)

1999-10-02 Thread Craig Sanders
that way here, it's not who you work for that's important, it's what you've done. It is my hope that Craig Sanders reads this and thinks about what he has done and why. very little of what i write is done without review and consideration of the effect of my words. i am a very deliberate writer. i

Re: How not to be a nice person (Was: Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality)

1999-10-02 Thread Craig Sanders
can't comprehend that someone might deliberately choose those words, then that is your problem not mine. such paucity of imagination is truly sad. craig -- craig sanders

Re: How not to be a nice person (Was: Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality)

1999-10-02 Thread Craig Sanders
it out was necessary. or at least see that stabbing at people isn't productive. if it makes fools quit their yapping then it can be highly productive. this discussion is a waste of time. craig -- craig sanders

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-10-02 Thread Craig Sanders
change, so follows principle of least surprise. easy to remember. init.d scripts are conffiles so it won't be automatically replaced at the next upgrade. cons: you have to re-do the change if you ever upgrade and answer Y to dpkg's question about replacing /etc/init.d/postgresql. craig -- craig

Re: Is this a bug in grep, or is it me...

1999-10-02 Thread Craig Sanders
override.potato will do the job, and is probably significantly faster than an awk script. craig -- craig sanders

Re: SSH never free

1999-10-02 Thread Craig Sanders
free software in the free world, but encumbered by a patent problem in the world's favourite police state. craig PS: the RSA patent expires in 2001 (or is it 2002?), anyway. -- craig sanders

  1   2   3   4   >