On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:52:46PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Blow off the non-free software user, no. If you have nothing to offer
by way of help with vmware itself, then your silence will be enough to
indicate that.
And the user
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:28:12PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Jeroen Dekkers
| It does also other things, like making distribution creation more
| flexible. I'm thinking of having a some kind of package file for every
| source package. That would include the current information
before most servers have the images.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
think this is the right thing, because almost all init scripts
can be run by a non-root user in the Hurd. Also the check isn't good
enough for SE Linux. Maybe you could do chmod o-x for the all the init
scripts or other things, but IMHO those things should not go into
Debian.
Jeroen Dekkers
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 05:28:19PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:04:12PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
The GNU FDL violates the DFSG ?
In case this is true, nearly all KDE packages have to be moved to
non-free as they use the GNU FDL for the documentation
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 05:22:53PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:29:27PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
IMO, an FDL-licensed document with invariant sections is non-free. As a
user of Debian, I'd like to know that they're not installed on my system
if I'm only
software, now you get
the consequences. Debian doesn't support vmware, so go somewhere else
with your vmware problems. (Debian does support plex86 and bochs, BTW)
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 04:12:16AM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 03:03:14AM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
We should not advertise directly or indirectly non-free software.
Er, we _host_ non-free software on our servers, and distribute it via
our mirror network
because the manpages
are under the GNU FDL.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp0I7YA1WioQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
move all GPL'd software to non-free at same time.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp0gjaoQS6XZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-topic.
The funny thing is that this is made clear in the thread he pointed
at. That thread is a really interested read BTW (it makes me subscribe
to debian-legal :-).
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU supporter - http
supporting them? Sorry, I think this is ridiculous. Does
debconf really need money from a proprietary software company? Why
does Debian promote of non-free software (indirectly)? I thought
Debian was about free software.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 05:25:10PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 15:09, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
I don't *like* the registration page being hosted on IIS. But I prefer a
registration page to no registration page at all.
Is it that difficult to make a registration page
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 12:17:46AM +0100, Thom May wrote:
* Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
It subverts my principles (and probably also others). The fact that
the company itself is probably also going to distribute non-free
software also subverts my principles.
The thing
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 07:30:21PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 18:59, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
The keyword here is prominent.
Yes, it is.
The
Debian servers don't run non-free software provided by HP and/OR
Sun. The debconf2 registration page is hosted on a server
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 07:30:48PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 17:54, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
The thing I want say is: Debian is about free software, IMHO we should
not have such a prominent sponser promoting non-free
software. Especially as we probably don't need
allocation and not limit you in any way.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpb7ykYD6UYl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
101 - 117 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
