[Sent on behalf of Manoj since he is unkeyed at present]
The platforms for the candidates for Debian Project Leader for the coming
year are now available from
http://www.debian.org/vote/2005/vote_001
- Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 04:50:02PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
As I'm responsible for most of dpkg-sig's code (and planned to do some
more work in the next two months) I'd like to know if anyone cares about
using these binary signatures or if I can invest my time into something
that's
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 10:29:32AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
I would speculate debsigs got a name change to dpkg-sig. Can somebody
confirm or deny?
As Mark said, it's not a name change. The FAQ on the dpkg-sig site
(http://dpkg-sig.turmzimmer.net/) has more info.
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:08:17AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:33:47AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Marc Brockschmidt:
Today (or last night, whatever), the dak installation on ftp-master was
changed to not accept packages that include more than 3 parts, which
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:54:33AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:37:05PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
Personally, I think it's cryptographic snake oil, at least in so far
A signed deb has a seal of procedence
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 12:30:37PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 09:09:21AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
3) I can verify the provenance of a particular package in my own custom
repos at any time (did that come from Debian? Did someone build it
internally? What's
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 03:48:15PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:31:22PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
I think the final judgment in this issue is going to come down to personal
taste and needs more than anything else.
That's fine for personal repositories, it's
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:38:45AM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2005 11:17 AM, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:11:45PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
[...]
On that score, the description for d-d-c says that it includes
buildd
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:22:37PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
A signature in the deb by a random developer is as trustworthy as the
changes file and you already trust that. So we are going from snakeoil
to snakoil. No harm done.
It's not the same, actually. A signature in a .deb needs
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 05:45:53PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I just had a bug that I opened (#339832) closed by a changelog entry in
a new debconf upload. This is apparently a typo, as the changelog entry
claims that the bug it was closing was related to a Swedish translation
update.
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 02:22:41PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is dig through the Perl code
in merkel:/org/bugs.debian.org/scripts and work out how to add this
functionality. grin
You can use package foo as a command
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:37:28PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
does one know why xmcd isn't upgraded since 31 of May in 2003? The
package is neither orphaned nor up for adoption, which I would do
then.
Have you asked the maintainer, Adrian Bridgett? He's around (last made an
upload less
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:54:26PM +0200, Radu Spineanu wrote:
* Package name: xen-debiantools
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Considering the upstream author, have you discussed your plans to upload
this with Steve?
- Matt
signature.asc
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:02:09AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
On Sunday 08 January 2006 07:27, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:19:42PM -0500, Frans Jessop wrote:
Ubuntu's launchpad is amazing. Do you think it would be helpful if all
DD's worked through it on their
[This is probably more appropriate for the debian-mentors list]
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 05:47:32PM +0100, Daniel Knabl wrote:
|dh_gencontrol
|dpkg-gencontrol -ldebian/changelog -isp
|-Tdebian/vexim.substvars -Pdebian/vexim dpkg-gencontrol: error: control
|file must have at least one
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 04:48:11PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
On Sunday 08 January 2006 14:32, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:25:28AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
Oh, I never signed an NDA, so I've never seen the code, actually I'm not
interested in the code, because
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:25:28AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
On Sunday 08 January 2006 09:49, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:02:09AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
On Sunday 08 January 2006 07:27, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:19:42PM -0500, Frans
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 04:47:56PM +, Martin Meredith wrote:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 15:19:42 -0500, Frans Jessop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Ubuntu's launchpad is amazing. Do you think it would be helpful if
all DD's worked through it on their projects?
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:44:57AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
On Sunday 08 January 2006 10:39, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 07:49:33PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:02:09AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
On Sunday 08 January 2006 07:27
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:03:14PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 1/13/06, Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please stop trying to twist my words around. Canonical didn't contribute
back. An individual who happened to work for Canonical
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:14:18PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Some things that it does say:
[...]
- Ubuntu submits fixes for Debian bugs to the Debian BTS including a patch
URL
If that said sometimes or some people within Ubuntu, it would be
correct. Not every relevant patch ends up in
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 08:21:20AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
And on _top_ of that, we have all sorts of gratuitous autotools
changes.
Let's not forget the random conversion of build systems -- dpatch seems to
be a favourite to rewrite perfectly functioning build systems into.
This is
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 08:51:12AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hello Joey,
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
Leaving ubuntu out of this, what puzzles me about your message, Raphael,
is this:
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
If you have some uploads pending, and would like to see those
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:30:22PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 11:01, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
So you are saying it's the Debian Developer's job to pull changes from
ubuntu back? If that is an official statement, then that would be useful
for a d-d-a mail so we are
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 12:10:54AM +0100, JanC wrote:
On 1/17/06, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about renaming Maintainer to Debian-Maintainer in Ubuntu's binary
packages, and having a specific Ubuntu-Maintainer?
This should probably happen in a way that all (or most)
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 03:59:23PM +, Kurt Pfeifle wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote on debian-devel@lists.debian.org:
[Re-adding Cc to Kurt, as he's mentioned he isn't subscribed]
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 01:20:26PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
Kurt Pfeifle wrote:
The klik client
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:20:33AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 07:08:38PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
I keep hearing this, but I really don't believe it. In Debian, Maintainer
means An individual or group of people primarily responsible for the
on-going well being
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 12:41:49PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 07:13:31AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:20:33AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
By way of example, the Debian maintainer is equipped to answer questions
like why is the package
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 01:40:11PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 08:31:44AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
All you'll get is the loud minority having a whinge then, no matter what the
outcome.
It will certainly beat the hell out of continuing this thread.
It will just
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:33:33PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 22 January 2006 03:16, David Weinehall wrote:
Since all Ubuntu packages are recompiled against a different set of
libraries, the bug might not even affect the Debian package, even though
they share the same source.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 02:58:05PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
There have already been - admittedly sporadic - proposals to rewrite
some key parts of the system, like the init scripts or adduser, in
python. However, if the proponent knows from the beginning the
implementation wouldn't be
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 04:17:13AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le samedi 28 janvier 2006 à 17:01 -0600, Peter Samuelson a écrit :
[Josselin Mouette]
Because python and ruby have similar features
Same with perl and python.
Great. I guess you're going to second the upcoming GR that
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 11:03:03AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 30 janvier 2006 à 10:20 +1100, Matthew Palmer a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 02:58:05PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
There have already been - admittedly sporadic - proposals to rewrite
some key parts
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 02:46:02AM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:04:17AM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
However, the code of conduct seems to
point out that one should not Cc someone unless they specifically ask
for it (a guideline that you neglected to follow, after
. If
multiple packages containing the data can be installed, though, you will of
course need to use the alternatives system to manage which one gets used.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http
.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
and
pester you with problems instead of setting the whole project off into a
paroxym of heated messages (to say the least).
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
).
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
On Sat, 26 Apr 2003, Nick Phillips wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 09:20:33AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
Another question, of course, is what does supporting 386s lose us? I've
Binary compatibility with other distributions usability of 3rd-party
C++ binaries. That was what started
On 26 Apr 2003, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le sam 26/04/2003 à 02:59, Matthew Palmer a écrit :
For the original problem, it surely should be possible to build 386 and 486+
versions of libstdc++ and include both in the distro, with linker magic (or
installer magic) to tell the difference
it for inclusion.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
cause undue disruption to other current
functionality, I'd be quite happy to apply the change and reupload ASAP.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
probably burn them a Mandrake disc. If
they want shiny! then they can have shiny.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
experience
that new version of A probably requires all sorts of new crap from B
anyway...
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
source level compatibility
are rather rare.
You're forgetting the rapid pace of distributed development...
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:36:12AM
+1000:
*very* serious problem for anyone who starts relying on the binary packages
uploaded to m.d.n. What sort of protections do you have in place or plan to
put
as it goes into Debian.
Not checking over the source is likely to cause much grief.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-05-17
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: fbpanel
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Anatoly Asviyan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://fbpanel.sf.net/
* License : BSD
Description : A lightweight X11 desktop panel
.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
country, or its economy, they shall have to live with the consequences.
Boycott us back. Considering the US government screws .au at every
opportunity, I doubt we'd even notice.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer
no need for totally separate adduser and adduser-ldap programs - the
two co-exist quite nicely.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Zed Pobre wrote:
Could you elaborate on what ways yours works better than the original
adduser? I'm sure Roland would love to hear about functionality
improvements, and I'd certainly be keen for any improvements to the
LDAP-specific code...
My version will
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Zed Pobre wrote:
Could you elaborate on what ways yours works better than the original
adduser? I'm sure Roland would love to hear about functionality
improvements, and I'd certainly be keen for any improvements to the
LDAP-specific code...
My
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
on your usage of maildirmake in
this courier-less situation?
[1] Arguments as to whether Debian should do this or not should be directed
to /dev/null.
Thanks Andreas
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, David B Harris wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:46:48 +1000 (EST)
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I'm wondering about it even more. IMHO `maildirmake' is _very_
necessary for any mail and as it seems
aesthetic
antennae are twitching...
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
in that version of the
package. It implies that versions less than the one in which the changelog
entry appear have the bug - which they do not.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au
.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
be changed to be suitable for the non-free
section?
I think the only thing needed would be to get an OK for Debian to distribute
the program, in modified form. That'd get it into non-free.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:07:25PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
That's odd, because debian-devel@lists.debian.org is a mailing list run on a
Debian GNU/Linux machine, which is immune to windows macro virii.
You *do* realize that saying virii
for another product...
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
there are
Debian boxes, overall, I agree.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:27:04PM -0600, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 08:43:20AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 24-Jul-03, 17:56 (CDT), Dwayne C. Litzenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Systems with large numbers of users (and normally use, for example
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 12:10:01AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
debconf (important) depends on liblocale-gettext-perl (standard).
Presumably liblocale-gettext-perl should become important.
Or debconf could be replaced in 'important' with cdebconf, of course.
Ouch... g
db2:
This is
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 02:45:56AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
db2:
This is pretty old... who still uses it, anyway? More specifically,
does anyone use libdb2++, and if so, are they only things which
aren't supposed to be transitioned?
OK, this is an odd list:
Package: libdb2++
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 11:39:38AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 07:10:06PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
And, quite honestly, animals should probably disappear. When all of a
maintainer's packages were NMU'd into stable, and they haven't moved since,
it's time to say
[It might also be a good idea to wrap your postings]
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:07:46PM +0200, Xavier Roche wrote:
It might be a good idea to reject MIME messages in -devel? Do we need
attachments? (patchs can be inserted in the message body)
GPG/MIME is nice. And attached patches make things
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 10:08:17AM +0200, Micha? Politowski wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:30:11 +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 01:17:01PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
http://www.steve.org.uk/cgi-bin/debian/index.cgi
If you're just scanning for binaries with s bits
The latest upstream version of a package I've begun to maintain, IRM, has a
problem in that a portion of the data in the system (relating to software
and licence assignment) can't be upgraded along with the rest of the
database - the schema is totally different.
I've thought about it for a while,
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 01:59:43PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
Matthew Palmer (2003-08-01 19:51:46 +1000) :
The latest upstream version of a package I've begun to maintain,
IRM, has a problem in that a portion of the data in the system
(relating to software and licence assignment) can't
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 08:04:09AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
- dump the old software tables and store the dump somewhere, giving
pointers to the dump in all sorts of useful places. But if I put it
somewhere temporary (/tmp
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:36:52AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 07:51:46PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
The latest upstream version of a package I've begun to maintain, IRM, has a
problem in that a portion of the data in the system (relating to software
and licence
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 01:21:52PM -0500, Thomas Smith wrote:
architecture combination) release would be like at any time. It becomes more
complicated when dealing with RC bugs than it is with the buildds, because
they don't have architecture tags (some of them have [subject prefixes] but I
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:10:08AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Adam Majer
| My definition of MIA for DD: Doesn't fix release critical bugs for
| his/her package(s) within a week or two and doesn't respond to
| direct emails about those bugs.
I guess I'm MIA, then, since I have an RC
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:58:22AM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
IMHO, people should not package or take over a package that they
do not understand how it works. For example, a kernel maintainer
[...]
People should maintain packages they are qualified to maintain
Well, I see you're taking your own
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:04:45AM +0200, C?dric Delfosse wrote:
So, I wonder if someone has already built a package from a SRPM package
I certainly haven't, but surely you could use RPM to extract the source from
the SRPM, then tarball it back up, and there's your .orig.tar.gz?
Build as per
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 11:41:09PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:53:32PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
I have a silly little problem with getting Python's distutils to play
nice with Debian packaging
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 02:40:24PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 11:54:05 +0200, J?r?me Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay, that's what t-p-u is roughly for, but the fact is that it's
quite painful.
Could you elaborate
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 10:35:53AM +0200, Arnaud Kyheng wrote:
I love the Debian project, and I have worked on a new development for
it: Apt-Torrent :)
Apt-Torrent is an apt proxy to the Bittorrent network. For security, the
package listing, and the .torrent files are downloaded from a
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 12:00:16PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
If we can get individually-signed .debs, you won't even need to worry so
much about getting the torrent files off a trusted mirror...
dpkg-sig exists. Use it :)
Thanks
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:15:19AM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
I am facing a problem with my ISP started filtering incoming mails with
SPF. Since AOL adopted it, it seems becoming quite popular as I see it.
[...]
SPF has known issue with e-mail forwarder such as pobox.com. I think
debian.org
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 09:59:44AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Osamu Aoki
| If you know easy way to avoid this problem exists, please let me know.
| (Changing ISP is certainly an option.)
Use BSTMP to gluck.
(If your ISP can't be whacked into turning it off/Implementing yahoo's
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:11:07PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Matthew Palmer
| Uhm, having just read through the supplied URL, I can't agree with the
| sanity of the proposal.
| It appears to require that headers not be modified at all in transit
| (which means that forwarding becomes
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 03:15:09PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 10:37:08PM +1100, Matthew Palmer said
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:11:07PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
It gives you traceability and it can be used to prevent joe-jobs.
It's not a silver bullet solution
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 11:48:29AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:38:20 +1100, Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a question you'll have to ask of Yahoo and the SPF people. My guess
is that the pushers of these schemes want their thing adopted for whatever
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 07:27:06PM +0200, Hartmut Rummel wrote:
This is cory yearwood from Exsis. Please can you remove the e-mail from your
website..
And yet the name in your From: line is Hartmut Rummel, and you're using a
totally different e-mail address.
Either way, I doubt that post
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 12:31:18PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
On the topic of all those talks about reducing network traffic caused by
apt-get update, without putting too high load into server (as rsync does).
Can't CVS (or Subversion or other similar tool) solve this problem?
Seems
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 01:29:38PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
When running apt-get dist-upgrade I'd like to be able to set a list of
packages whose confiles shall be replaced by the newer versions
supplied by the package (if any) , while other packages' confiles
should be keep
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:12:12PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Steve McIntyre]
So, let me get this straight - fakepop will allow people to log in
(using their username and password) in the clear and THEN tell them
that they should have used POP over SSL instead. Quite how is this
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 05:17:33AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 11:04 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
So, let me get this straight - fakepop will allow people to log in
(using their username and password) in the clear and THEN tell them
that they should have used POP over
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 08:50:08PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Yes, hotbabe is sexist (at least in it's current incarnation - if it
included a male theme then it would only be sexually offensive to
some)
Anyone who feels that hot-babe would become less sexually offensive because
it included
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 02:38:54AM +0100, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
I can volunteer to provide some naked photos of myself, but I guess they will
be more suitable for section fun than section erotic.
There was discussion on IRC in the last few days about a Men of Debian
calendar. That'd
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:04:15PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
The poor man's daily snapshot, glastree builds live backup trees, with
branches for each day. Users directly browse the past to recover older
documents or retrieve lost files. Hard links serve to compress out
unchanged files, while
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:59:09PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
operates?
glastree provides a subset of the functionality of dirvish. It is
actually most
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:58:17PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:59:09PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
operates?
glastree
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 10:30:05PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
Is there any benefit to using glastree over dirvish or pdumpfs?
The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
it in the
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 04:10:01AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Meanwhile, what's
the total installed space for glastree if you're not a Perl lover?
Perl-base is 'Proirity: required' and 'Essential: yes'. It doesn't
even have to be depended
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 07:02:38PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:00:22 +1100, Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
3314kB, including pdumpfs itself. I'll donate a 32MB USB key to store it
all on for anyone that is *truly* that starved of space.
Low-Memory systems
1 - 100 of 423 matches
Mail list logo
