Hi folks. I've just uploaded Mit Kerberos 1.4.3-1 to experimental.
I'm writing to you because your package links against the main
kerberos library (libkrb53) and I'd like you to confirm that the
Kerberos support in your package still works against this version.
The public ABI and API of MIt
Chip == Chip Salzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chip Who does a developer have to fuck around here to get his key
Chip deleted? -- Chip Salzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chip -- To UNSUBSC
Hi. As you are no doubt aware by now, getting your key removed is a
great mystery and deep
In order to actually get something done in an electronic office, we
need a certain amount of infrastructure. In a large environment, the
incremental costs are somewhat visible, but you won't see how much
work it took to get there. In practice, starting from ground zero
means
Bernd == Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bernd Hello Sam, On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 11:27:44PM -0500, Sam
Bernd Hartman wrote:
In order to actually get something done in an electronic
office, we need a certain amount of infrastructure.
Bernd Thanks for your work.
[I'm responding to Herbert directly to draw attention to this question
and make sure I get a response from him. I have also read the rest of
this thread even though I am responding to a fairly early message. ]
I'm approaching this as the maintainer of the openafs package, which
has a kernel
Herbert == Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert I doubt the increase is going to be that significant.
Herbert Since most of these will eventually become part of the
Herbert mainstream kernel or get dropped.
I hope that is not actually the trend we see.
image.
[cc list is an attempt at stakeholders for this issue. If I missed
people, I'm sorry. If I annoyed people by ccing them even though they
read the list, well I'm sorry too, but there are a fair number of
people who tend to want to be explicitly cc'd when an issue pertains
to them.]
Summary:
One thing that strikes me as excellent about Debian is the build
system. The autobuilders and tools make it very likely that package
builds are reproducible and a variety of tools like debhelper make it
easier to do the right thing in many circumstances than doing
something wrong. I've come
Herbert == Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert BTW, this is how the kernel images are organised on
Herbert alpha/i386/sparc.
This is misleading. The kernel-image-*-arch packages are much simpler
because they do not depend both on a kernel source package and on a
module deb
] (kernel-image-i386 maintainer),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (concerned about package size)
Subject: Referring what kernel-images to build to the technical committee?
Reply-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
From: Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-From: debian-devel
] (kernel-image-i386 maintainer),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (concerned about package size)
Subject: Referring what kernel-images to build to the technical committee?
Reply-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
From: Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-From: debian-devel
Herbert == Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is misleading. The kernel-image-*-arch packages are much
simpler because they do not depend both on a kernel source
package and on a module deb package. Also, note
Brian == Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian I have got a bug report #95246 requesting Heimdal be
Brian compiled against openldap2. This would enable being able to
Brian store the Kerberos database in the openldap database. All
Brian data is stored in LDAP encrypted, so
Joey == Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joey If these tools become widly enough accepted that we think
Joey everyone should have them available by default, we can make
Joey them standard priority.
In the new universe (debbootstrap, tasksel, etc) where a user might
never run
Petr == Petr Cech [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since this question is currently being referred to legal
advice, do you want me to move postgresql into non-us, which
will force any packages depending on it into non-us too, or
should I leave it alone pending resolution of the
Ivan == Ivan E Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ivan Solution?: create a program (update-dm?) that would pull
Ivan the current list of window/session-managers installed on the
Ivan system and build the appropriate config files for whichever
You should probably consider whether this
Manoj == Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Aaron == Aaron Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Aaron So you're saying it's better to hardcode syscall numbers
Aaron and stuff than using the kernel headers? Sre...
Manoj We already have a process for packages that
Herbert == Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We do? please explain what it is. Herbert produces kernel
headers packages for all flavors of kernels he produces. I do
not believe the other arches do this.
Herbert You
Herbert == Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert I won't look at all of them as this is really the
Herbert upstream maintainer's job.
This brings up an interesting point. While we should work with
upstream maintainers to fix these problems, we should also try to
avoid making
So, a week or so ago, I asked for comments on some problems I've been
having with the Debian kernel modules build system for modules not in
the Linux source tree. I'm only dealing with modules for upload to
Debian. The make-kpkg solution seems to work for individuals building
modules for their
Herbert == Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for needs to be determined by the architecture maintainers.
For Sparc, modversions are not used so you can probably build
one sparc and one sparc64 module. For i386, you need to build
Herbert == Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This brings up an interesting point. While we should work with
upstream maintainers to fix these problems, we should also try
to avoid making these programs harder to build on Debian
Manoj == Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sam == Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Manoj == Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Aaron == Aaron Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Aaron So you're saying it's better to hardcode syscall numbers
Aaron and stuff
Henrique == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Henrique AFAIK, I cannot do that. If I build against testing, I
Henrique help the breakage by adding yet another package that
Henrique depends on the outdated libraries that are in testing,
Henrique therefore
Marc == Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc On Sun, 2 Sep 2001 22:49:00 +0200 (CEST), Santiago Vila
Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, you can repackage the .orig.tar.gz source and remove
the non-US bits from it. Then you could upload both source and
binaries to
Jules == Jules Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jules This seems a step back from the old freeze procedure, where
Jules you could upload to frozen (and, I assume, auto-builders
Jules were building against frozen)
Well, once your library and all dependencies are frozen you can act as
Marc == Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc On 02 Sep 2001 23:18:56 -0400, Sam Hartman
Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc wrote:
Marc == Marc Haber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc On Sun, 2 Sep 2001 22:49:00 +0200 (CEST), Santiago Vila
Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Won't removing kernel-source-2.4.18 create a problem for other arches?
Yes, the machine had a bad disk crash and I restored the other
services but failed to get debian-kerberos working. IT is up now.
Hi.
I noticed that in order to implement your read-only root proposal, you
propose to modify the pam package.
I'm not really sure I see the justification for read-only /. I can
see several possible justifications and some of the possible goals
conflict.
Until you get general consensus on a
Jamie == Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jamie This one time, at band camp, Sam Hartman wrote:
Until you get general consensus on a specific goal, I'm
unlikely to accept such changes if they are submitted to me.
As a maintainer I want to be able to look at some
OK, I think my worst fears are realized. You do actually want to
solve all the goals I could have imagined you possibly wanting to try
try and solve.
I think I am very likely to wait until there is a policy change or at
least text that would be good guidelines as a policy change before
Gerfried == Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gerfried * Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-05-16
Gerfried 13:33]:
Such a package should be as close to possible to the version
actually in testing, and not depend on packages and/or versions
that are not yet in
[Please cc me; I'm very behind on -devel]
I'm very confused by this bug and am sufficiently busy this week that
I'm not going to be able to diagnose it right now.
Could anyone who has a chance to do so please look at exactly what is
failing from a dependency standpoint?
I get the feeling I'm
Joey == Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joey Steve Langasek wrote:
- It will now be possible to choose md5 vs. crypt passwords at
install time without violating policy. (Currently, a number of
conffiles are being modified by maintainer scripts in order to
enable md5
Matt == Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matt I think a single Will you be using NIS? question would be
Matt justified; this could provide defaults for md5 vs. crypt
Matt passwords and setuid-ness of unix_chkpwd, and so those
Matt questions could be suppressed by default.
Andreas == Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 11:37:45AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Andreas [...]
I'd rather see a solution where we have some nis support
package that makes unix_chkpwd
aj == Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
aj or overloaded with work, or, for that matter, fixing compromised Debian
aj servers -- do you think it's desirable and possible to:
aj * for confirmed bugs with a known fix, upload a fixed package
aj within a
Randolph == Randolph Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Automatic Package Building System page[1] lists the build
daemons with web pages. It does not list those without,
however. Since my latest libcdaudio packages are considered
out of date on i386, I was wondering if a
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
Hi. AS discussed below, I intend to package OpenSSH using the current
Debian sources with patches to allow krb5 authentication. I will use
the patches available at
http://www.sxw.org.uk/computing/patches/openssh.html. These patches
attempt to comply with
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
I'm planning on packaging libsasl2-gssapi-mit, a version of the GSSAPI
plugin for libsasl2 compiled against MIT Kerberos.
This package has the same source as cyrus-sasl2, but different build
environment and options. It's not really possible to avoid having two
Christian == Christian Surchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christian Ari wrote to me in the end of october to ask me about
Christian my intention about logjam packaging. I had an enormous
Christian backlog and I could not be able to reply. Then he filed
Christian a wishlist bug
Russell == Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russell Do we have a library in Debian that provides reliable
Russell stream based communication over UDP?
librx from openafs provides this functionality; it may be somewhat
more complexity than you are looking for.
Ari == Ari Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IIRC Ari has caused upset with NMUs before; xscreensaver, I
believe. (I express no opinion about whether that upload was a
good idea or not.)
Ari Didn't you sponsor the upload?
Um, so? While yes the sponsor is at fault, it seems
Ari == Ari Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ari I had been taking the full brunt of the responsibility for
Ari the xscreensaver NMU, but since I was a pre-NM at the time
Ari and sponsors of uploads are supposed to follow Debian policy
Ari as well, he ended up taking most of the
Does the krb524 functionality disappear from the KDC if you turn off
krb4?
If so, that will be a problem for current openafs, although probably
not for future openafs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Last night I uploaded a more or less rewrite of krb5-config to
experimental. The goal of this rewrite is to significantly reduce the
number of cases where users are asked questions or where the resulting
configuration is completely wrong.
krb5-config is responsible for generating
I'd recommend coordinating any such model with the upstream Kerberos
implementations and with distributions.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Folks, there was a longish discussion on IRC starting about an hour
ago about dash and bash.
I agree we want to move the default /bin/sh to /bin/dash.
However I'm failing to understand why we want dash to be essential.
If I'm not using dash as my /bin/sh why do I need it?
If the answer is
Luk == Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes:
Luk We want everyone to use dash by default. If someone does not
Luk want to use the default, they are free to do so, but the
Luk default system shell is supposed to always be on the system.
Why?
I agree something should always provide /bin/sh.
Siggy == Siggy Brentrup deb...@psycho.i21k.de writes:
8
I agree we want to move the default /bin/sh to /bin/dash.
However I'm failing to understand why we want dash to be
essential. If I'm not using dash as my /bin/sh why do I need
it?
Siggy So you are complaining about
Steve, let's take a step back and calm down.
Are you saying that your objection to engineering a solution where
dash doesn't need to be essential is that it's not worth the effort?
I *think* that was the point of your message but am not entirely sure.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Steve == Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
Steve On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 04:33:21AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Steve, let's take a step back and calm down.
Are you saying that your objection to engineering a solution
where dash doesn't need to be essential is that it's
Hi, folks.
I've just uploaded krb5 1.6.1 to experimental. This is a new version
with enhanced plugin support, support for realm referrals, support for
storing Kerberos credentials in the Linux keyring rather than on disk,
and generally improvements all around. The one big feature that is
Marcus == Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marcus Russ Allbery wrote:
Correct. In general, you never want to have Kerberos keys in
your KDC for a service principal for enctypes that that service
doesn't support.
Marcus Is there an easy way to find out which
[There are some questions at the end; comments would be greatly
appreciated on the questions if you have ever been involved in the
release process or library transitions before. This is my first big
transition.]
The libkrb53 package (providing the MIT Kerberos shared libraries) has
been stable
Julien == Julien BLACHE jbla...@debian.org writes:
Julien Sam Hartman hartm...@debian.org wrote: Hi,
That is, if I made the dependency in libkrb5-3.symbols look
like libkrb5-3|libkrb53 (and similar changes for other symbols
files), then both the packages in unstable
Sam == Sam Hartman hartm...@debian.org writes:
Julien == Julien BLACHE jbla...@debian.org writes:
Julien Sam Hartman hartm...@debian.org wrote: Hi,
That is, if I made the dependency in libkrb5-3.symbols look
like libkrb5-3|libkrb53 (and similar changes for other symbols
Julien == Julien BLACHE jbla...@debian.org writes:
I really appreciate your help here!
Julien As you note in your second reply, the goal is to decouple
Julien the packaging change from the krb4 dismissal: 1 introduce
Julien libkrb5-3 (Replaces: libkrb53), with libkrb53 depending on
OK, so I think we're all set.
The plan now is to
1) Build twice, once into build and once into build-krb4. We only
pull libkrb4.so out of build-krb4. 2) Move all the libraries out of
libkrb53 and libkadm55 (sorry, in my previous mails I was simplifying
a bit) except for libkrb4.so.2.
3)
Brian == Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au writes:
Brian Ben Finney wrote:
I invite anyone interested in knowing how the distinct areas of
identity, trust, and security intersect with the OpenID system,
to research the available documentation.
Brian ...except
Sam == Sam Hartman hartm...@debian.org writes:
Sam OK, so I think we're all set. The plan now is to
Sam 1) Build twice, once into build and once into build-krb4. We
Sam only pull libkrb4.so out of build-krb4. 2)
This works at least.
Sam 3) Make libkrb53 depend on all
Steve == Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
Steve Actually, I was meaning to comment on this. Why would you
Steve not simply point the shlibs at the component library
Steve packages at this stage? The only side effect is that the
Steve version of krb5 that includes the
Julien == Julien BLACHE jbla...@debian.org writes:
Julien Sam Hartman hartm...@debian.org wrote: Hi,
It turns out this fails impressively. The problem is that the
library packages depend on each other. So, for example,
libk5crypto3 is needed by libkrb5-3. If I make
Folks, I'd appreciate it if people could try and test version
1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-8 from experimental of the krb5 package.
The biggest change is a packaging reorganization. So, while I'm
certainly interested in Kerberos users testing the packages, I'm most
interested in people other than me
I'd like to chime in with the general concern that the proposal to
remove a bunch of groups from udev seems under-baked and that the
current groups have value.
I definitely would like to see the tss (tpm) group remain along with
the kvm and fuse groups. I think scanner is important as well.
I
Yeah, I'm reasonably sure that alternatives are wrong for kadmin.
Editor is intended to be used by a user. Kadmin is often used by
users but is also quite often used by scripts.
Editors also can all work with text files. It's basically not true
that you can use a heimdal kadmin against an MIT
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
owner: hartm...@debian.org
name: krb5-appl
URL: http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/dist/krb5-appl
License: MIT Kerberos license
(roughly MIT license plus a requirement that if you modify the
software you must mark it as modified)
description: Contains fairly
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
URL: https://fedorahosted.org/libverto/
Description: libverto provides a common interface on top of libev, libevent,
glib, tevent.
The goal is to allow development of asynchronous libraries that will work
with whatever event loop an application happens to be
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
URL: libradsec branch of http://www.project-moonshot.org/gitweb/radsecproxy.git
URL2: http://software.uninett.no/radsecproxy/
Description: libradsec is a library for RADIUS clients and servers
This library features support for RADSEC (RADIUS over TLS/DTLS) as
For myself, I'd feel a lot more comfortable with DDs seconding than DMs
seconding.
In my mind, when you sign up to be a DM, you're signing up to do a good
job of maintaining one or more packages.
In my mind a part of the additional commitment in agreeing to be a DD is
to think about the broader
hi.
A few months ago, Russ Allberry stepped down from co-maintaining
krb5-appl.
I'm reasonably happy to keep maintaining it, although when we thought
about it, we cannot think of anyone using the package.
It provides krb5 versions of rlogin, rsh, ftp and telnet.
The telnet is insecure and should
FWIW, I'm not seeing enough demand that I'm interested in maintaining
krb5-appl.
I plan to request removal.
If there's a debian developer who thinks I'm making the wrong call they
should feel free to turn my removal request into a request to adopt the
package.
--Sam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
control: subscribe -1
Charles == Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
Charles The 3.0 (native) format is useful when packaging a work
Charles that is developped and distributed in a Git repository.
Charles Please leave us this possibility.
Let me describe the use case I have
Andreas == Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org writes:
Andreas On 2014-02-05 10:57, Sam Hartman wrote:
tarballs useful; anyone who is likely to want to build this from
source probably has a copy of git and can checkout a tag.
Andreas Such a tag corresponds to an upstrema version
I've tried to do a reasonable job with the krb5-config package of
updating a user-managed krb5.conf and keeping it in sync with debconf
data.
It's quite old and I doubt it's best practice any more but it is an
example of how to approach a non-shell-script package.
The debconf-managed comment is
Neil == Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes:
That makes sense and I do something similar as appropriate. Even so, I
do not wish to maintain the upstream tarball as a maintained artifact.
There are cases where packaging release releases are made. Maintaining
pristine-tar commits for daily
Bernhard == Bernhard R Link brl...@debian.org writes:
As I mentioned I have a packaging branch and an upstream branch.
I wish to use debian revisions to reflect packaging changes.
It's slightly more complex than changes to debian directory involve a
debian revision change; changes to other
Russ == Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Russ Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
Secondly, there doesn't appear to be any support in policy for
this restriction.
Russ Policy definitely supports this restriction, as Guillem
Russ pointed out. I want to
Russ == Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Citation requested. I looked for this today and couldn't find
it.
Russ Policy lacks a section that clearly defines native and
Russ non-native packages, which is a long-standing bug in Policy.
Russ Currently, that information is
debianfan == debianfan debian...@hushmail.com writes:
debianfanI would like to propose forking Debian if the ctte
debianfan committee selects systemd
It's with great hesitation that I jump in here, and I know what I'm
doing is wrong.
I hope I've earned enough credibility over the
Thanks for sharing this.
So, you're frustrated and very disappointed because Ddebian, something
you cared about deeply has drifted so far away from what you want that
you can no longer support it?
I hope that if you decide to fork, you succeed in creating something
that meets your needs. I hope
Mario == Mario Lang ml...@delysid.org writes:
Mario That is what I was thinking as well, but just recently I had
Mario to killall pulseaudio to be able to access my ALSA device
Mario again.
Pulseaudio explicitly bypasses the dmix plugin and opens the alsa
hardware directly.
Colin == Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org writes:
Colin On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 07:46:53PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
*shrug* It's not like it's difficult to hide malicious code in
source packages.
How many configure scripts that we never rebuild from source
contains
All rants aside, I believe there's a fairly wide agreement that we
should throw away binaries from builds.
I seem to recall ftp-master sending out mail to debian-devel-announce
describing the steps along that process a while ago.
I think it's fine to ask where that project is, and to volunteer
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
owner: hartm...@debian.org
URL: git://git.project-moonshot.org/trust_router.git
http://www.project-moonshot.org/
license: bsd-3-clause
Description: The trust router establishes a DH key between two RADIUS
servers to protect a RADIUS over TLS session. GSS-API
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
owner: hartm...@debian.org
URL: http://www.shibboleth.org/
Source: svn https://svn.shibboleth.net/extensions/cpp-sp-resolver/trunk
Description: Shibboleth library to access Attribute Resolver
The Shibboleth Service provider consumes information about an
package: wnpp
owner: hartm...@debian.org
severity: wishlist
URL: http://www.project-moonshot.org/
source: git://git.project-moonshot.org/moonshot-ui.git
License: BSD-three-clause
Description: Project Moonshot provides federated access to services
combining the best of EAP, RADIUS (over TLS),
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
owner: hartm...@debian.org
URL: http://www.project-moonshot.org/
source: git://git.project-moonshot.org/moonshot-ui.git
license: BSD-3-Clause
Description: This package manages the Moonshot identity store,
permitting users to add and remove identities as well as
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
owner: hartm...@debian.org
x-debbugs-cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
source: git://git.project-moonshot.org/mech_eap.git
license: BSD-3-Clause
Description: Project moonshot provides federated access to a wide range
of applications. This package adds a GSS-API
Hi. back in 2011, I gave a talk at Debconf about the value of Debian to
people hoping to put together changes across an operating system. I was
using my work in Project moonshot as an example; we've been looking at
integrating new security services throughout an operating system.
Debian has
Early morning, Wednesday, November 19, the results of the GR on init
system coupling will be announced.
No result will make everyone happy. In fact, that morning, some of our
developers, users and contributors will be really unhappy.
I would be dishonest if I said I didn't hope to be happy and
Hi.
I've read the original proposal and believe it is generally going in the
right direction.
things I liked:
* didn't pick between dgit/git-dpm/git-pq; documented the common parts
* Seemed to really focus on one clear scope.
* Discouraged overlay packaging.
I've tried to read the arguments,
Patrick == Patrick Ouellette poue...@debian.org writes:
Patrick On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:06:08PM +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
Patrick I did not ask for evangelization about how wonderful binary
Patrick logs are, nor for a lesson on how to get the info out of
Patrick systemd
Patrick == Patrick Ouellette poue...@debian.org writes:
I think this is a bug.
On my system things get logged both to the journal and to
/var/log/syslog.
My understanding talking to systemd folks is that the behavior I'm
seeing is intended and that unless you went out of your way to
configure
package: syslog-ng-core
severity: important
version:3.3.5-4
justification: does not enable systemd unit.
syslog-ng-core's postinst does not enable its syslog unit.
I'm guessing that including systemd in the dh sequence is not quite
doing enough to actually turn it on.
Unfortunately dh-systemd
Russ == Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
A second option is to migrate on upgrade the uid/gid information
into an override in /etc/systemd/system. Requires dealing with
a dynamically generated config file in preinst/postinst, though,
which means the tools that help
Didier == Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org writes:
Didier Systems cross-craded from Ubuntu to Debian are absolutely
Didier not supported, and I wouldn't be surprised if some of the
Didier issues you're seeing are in some way related to this.
I've seen both these issues on pure
Didier == Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org writes:
Didier Steve's suggestions stands though: separated and actionable
Didier bugs for these two issues filed on the corresponding
Didier packages are way more helpful than a general non-sysvinit
Didier init systems are made of
I thought there was a flag bit you could set on x86 that causes
unaligned access to trap there too.
--Sam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
1 - 100 of 714 matches
Mail list logo
