-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:21:26 +1100
Source: ninvaders
Binary: ninvaders
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Palmer mpal...@debian.org
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer mpal
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matthew Palmer mpal...@debian.org
* Package name: ctcs
Version : 1.3.1pre1
Upstream Author : Jason T. Collins jcoll...@valinux.com
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/va-ctcs/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:48:21 +1100
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.23.2-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:55:19 +1100
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.23.2-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 11:28:50 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.23.2-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:11:25 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.23.2-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:45:07 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.23.2-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:55:34 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.23.2-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:06:11 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.23.2-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:41:32 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.23.2-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 07:58:22 +1000
Source: facter
Binary: facter
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:10:41 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.23.2-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:09:59 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.23.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:08:04 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.23.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:54:40 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.23.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 12:47:49 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.23.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 16:34:36 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.23.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:55:12 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.23.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 15:04:15 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.22.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 12:20:15 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.22.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:09:59 +1000
Source: facter
Binary: facter
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:03:33 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.22.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 09:06:46 +1100
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.22.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 08:41:35 +1100
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.22.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:54:19 +1100
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.20.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:24:59 +1100
Source: facter
Binary: facter
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:12:59AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
I have to admit that when choosing 0.09+0.1 as version number I didn't
check with dpkg --compare-versions because then I would have discovered
that dpkg --compare-versions '0.09' '=' '0.9' yields true, which I
think is rather odd,
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 07:47:36PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:29:40AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Michael Biebl [Fri, 11 Aug 2006 01:12:59 +0200]:
that dpkg --compare-versions '0.09' '=' '0.9' yields true, which I
think is rather odd, because it means
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 08:47:14PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:42:53AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
I'd imagine you'd be hard pressed to find a mathematician who knows what to
do with a number that reads 0.0.9, either. That's why we're software
developers
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 08:14:43PM +, David Nusinow wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 11:12:15AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
What I need as someone working on a package for which I'm not the
maintainer is this:
dpkg-source -x must give me something I can immediately edit and diff
on the
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 01:52:09PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
I demand that Matthew Palmer may or may not have written...
I've given up on this thread, but I just have to say one thing:
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 11:38:39AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
`Hate patch systems' can easily apply
I've given up on this thread, but I just have to say one thing:
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 11:38:39AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
`Hate patch systems' can easily apply all chunks and start
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Easily. Heh. You should be a comedian.
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:01:27PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 17:31, John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 05:20:26PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
debian/patches/ as separate file, how do I know how to update/remove/etc
There would be no
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:31:18PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think people that are NMUing packages rarely care about this.
When NMU'ing a package, I'd really appreciate to know which changes have
which purpose and which specificity. In particular
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:54:51PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 18:35, John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:01:27PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
How is that not true if one knows a given patch system and does know
about your VCS and needs to work
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:47:01PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 20:11, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you lose debian specific patches to be clearly separated from the
upstrem
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:36:18PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* John Goerzen [Wed, Aug 02 2006, 01:01:51PM]:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:47:01PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
to learn how we deal with this all.
This is fine, but (again) you forget about your 'apt-get
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:08:00AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Thursday 03 August 2006 00:45, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:47:01PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 20:11, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 02:40:47PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: phpunit2
*cough*330301*cough*
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:52:09 +1000
Source: fbpanel
Binary: fbpanel
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:46:06 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.18.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 10:58:50 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.18.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 13:10:01 +1000
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.18.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:13:30AM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le jeudi 06 juillet 2006 à 07:36 +1000, Matthew Palmer a écrit :
[about suid bits]
My personal preference would be for the maintainer to just take a stand, set
it or not, and let people who actually know what's going on to use
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 07:34:02AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 08:37:52PM -0400, LEE, Yui-wah (Clement) wrote:
I am building a package in which one of the binary has
to have the setuid and setgid bits set. I wonder which
one of the following two is the
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 09:36:37AM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 08:37:52PM -0400, LEE, Yui-wah (Clement) wrote:
I am building a package in which one of the binary has
to have the setuid and setgid bits set. I wonder which
one of the following two is the more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 09:40:54 +1000
Source: facter
Binary: facter
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:43:50 +1000
Source: facter
Binary: facter
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jamie Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 06:50:07PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Borowski wrote:
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 06:17:20PM -0400, Jason Spiro wrote:
[snip]
the moment you use openwatcom to compile any work-related piece
of software (thus not
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 12:44:40PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Don suggested to use the tags _and_ the versioning information in a
transitional period; I'm not 100% sure what this buys us, except that I'm
not sure how well
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 17:35:08 +1000
Source: phpreports
Binary: phpreports
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:40:13 +1000
Source: php4-sqlite
Binary: php4-sqlite
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.2-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:21:17 +1000
Source: phpunit
Binary: phpunit
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 22:12:40 +1000
Source: php4-sqlite
Binary: php4-sqlite
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.2-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:12:32PM +0100, Chris Forsey wrote:
Not sure if this is the right list, but unsure where to post as I need
some guys with good debian experience
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], for
starters. This list is for development of Debian itself.
-
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:30:59PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le samedi 20 mai 2006 à 19:43 -0700, Erast Benson a écrit :
Nexenta is absolutely rock stable OS (thanks to legendary Solaris
history)
Solaris history is indeed legendary, but not for its stability.
Well, when you consider
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 10:47:48AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 15.05.2006 um 10:32 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
CFEngine is in Debian, but has some real nasty frustrations. Puppet
isn't in Debian, but Jamie is working hard on the packages and I've got
some provisional ones built from
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:49:00AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in case I am in the wrong list, I beg you pardon, but I asked this
already in debian-user without success.
Custom *packages* is probably more on-topic for debian-mentors, but I don't
think that custom packages are the right
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:13:57AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the
time, doesn't it provide sunwlxsl on other arches?
But how? sunwlxsl is something which is only present in
OpenSolaris-based
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 05:55:05PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
Cyril Bouthors wrote:
On 3 Apr 2006, Adam Majer wrote:
But the correct method of closing bugs is to send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the explanation of the fix and not in
the changelog. Well, at least not in the
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 02:46:02AM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:04:17AM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
However, the code of conduct seems to
point out that one should not Cc someone unless they specifically ask
for it (a guideline that you neglected to follow, after
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 11:03:03AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 30 janvier 2006 à 10:20 +1100, Matthew Palmer a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 02:58:05PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
There have already been - admittedly sporadic - proposals to rewrite
some key parts
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 02:58:05PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
There have already been - admittedly sporadic - proposals to rewrite
some key parts of the system, like the init scripts or adduser, in
python. However, if the proponent knows from the beginning the
implementation wouldn't be
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 04:17:13AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le samedi 28 janvier 2006 à 17:01 -0600, Peter Samuelson a écrit :
[Josselin Mouette]
Because python and ruby have similar features
Same with perl and python.
Great. I guess you're going to second the upcoming GR that
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:33:33PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 22 January 2006 03:16, David Weinehall wrote:
Since all Ubuntu packages are recompiled against a different set of
libraries, the bug might not even affect the Debian package, even though
they share the same source.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 12:10:54AM +0100, JanC wrote:
On 1/17/06, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about renaming Maintainer to Debian-Maintainer in Ubuntu's binary
packages, and having a specific Ubuntu-Maintainer?
This should probably happen in a way that all (or most)
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 03:59:23PM +, Kurt Pfeifle wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote on debian-devel@lists.debian.org:
[Re-adding Cc to Kurt, as he's mentioned he isn't subscribed]
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 01:20:26PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
Kurt Pfeifle wrote:
The klik client
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:20:33AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 07:08:38PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
I keep hearing this, but I really don't believe it. In Debian, Maintainer
means An individual or group of people primarily responsible for the
on-going well being
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 12:41:49PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 07:13:31AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:20:33AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
By way of example, the Debian maintainer is equipped to answer questions
like why is the package
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 01:40:11PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 08:31:44AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
All you'll get is the loud minority having a whinge then, no matter what the
outcome.
It will certainly beat the hell out of continuing this thread.
It will just
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:30:22PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 11:01, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
So you are saying it's the Debian Developer's job to pull changes from
ubuntu back? If that is an official statement, then that would be useful
for a d-d-a mail so we are
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 08:51:12AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hello Joey,
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
Leaving ubuntu out of this, what puzzles me about your message, Raphael,
is this:
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
If you have some uploads pending, and would like to see those
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 08:21:20AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
And on _top_ of that, we have all sorts of gratuitous autotools
changes.
Let's not forget the random conversion of build systems -- dpatch seems to
be a favourite to rewrite perfectly functioning build systems into.
This is
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:03:14PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 1/13/06, Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please stop trying to twist my words around. Canonical didn't contribute
back. An individual who happened to work for Canonical
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:14:18PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Some things that it does say:
[...]
- Ubuntu submits fixes for Debian bugs to the Debian BTS including a patch
URL
If that said sometimes or some people within Ubuntu, it would be
correct. Not every relevant patch ends up in
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:02:09AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
On Sunday 08 January 2006 07:27, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:19:42PM -0500, Frans Jessop wrote:
Ubuntu's launchpad is amazing. Do you think it would be helpful if all
DD's worked through it on their
[This is probably more appropriate for the debian-mentors list]
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 05:47:32PM +0100, Daniel Knabl wrote:
|dh_gencontrol
|dpkg-gencontrol -ldebian/changelog -isp
|-Tdebian/vexim.substvars -Pdebian/vexim dpkg-gencontrol: error: control
|file must have at least one
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 04:48:11PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
On Sunday 08 January 2006 14:32, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:25:28AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
Oh, I never signed an NDA, so I've never seen the code, actually I'm not
interested in the code, because
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:25:28AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
On Sunday 08 January 2006 09:49, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:02:09AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
On Sunday 08 January 2006 07:27, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:19:42PM -0500, Frans
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 04:47:56PM +, Martin Meredith wrote:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 15:19:42 -0500, Frans Jessop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Ubuntu's launchpad is amazing. Do you think it would be helpful if
all DD's worked through it on their projects?
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:44:57AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
On Sunday 08 January 2006 10:39, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 07:49:33PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:02:09AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
On Sunday 08 January 2006 07:27
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:54:26PM +0200, Radu Spineanu wrote:
* Package name: xen-debiantools
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Considering the upstream author, have you discussed your plans to upload
this with Steve?
- Matt
signature.asc
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:37:28PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
does one know why xmcd isn't upgraded since 31 of May in 2003? The
package is neither orphaned nor up for adoption, which I would do
then.
Have you asked the maintainer, Adrian Bridgett? He's around (last made an
upload less
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 02:22:41PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is dig through the Perl code
in merkel:/org/bugs.debian.org/scripts and work out how to add this
functionality. grin
You can use package foo as a command
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 05:45:53PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I just had a bug that I opened (#339832) closed by a changelog entry in
a new debconf upload. This is apparently a typo, as the changelog entry
claims that the bug it was closing was related to a Swedish translation
update.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:22:37PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
A signature in the deb by a random developer is as trustworthy as the
changes file and you already trust that. So we are going from snakeoil
to snakoil. No harm done.
It's not the same, actually. A signature in a .deb needs
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:38:45AM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2005 11:17 AM, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:11:45PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
[...]
On that score, the description for d-d-c says that it includes
buildd
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:08:17AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:33:47AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Marc Brockschmidt:
Today (or last night, whatever), the dak installation on ftp-master was
changed to not accept packages that include more than 3 parts, which
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:54:33AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:37:05PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
Personally, I think it's cryptographic snake oil, at least in so far
A signed deb has a seal of procedence
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 12:30:37PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 09:09:21AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
3) I can verify the provenance of a particular package in my own custom
repos at any time (did that come from Debian? Did someone build it
internally? What's
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 03:48:15PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:31:22PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
I think the final judgment in this issue is going to come down to personal
taste and needs more than anything else.
That's fine for personal repositories, it's
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 04:50:02PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
As I'm responsible for most of dpkg-sig's code (and planned to do some
more work in the next two months) I'd like to know if anyone cares about
using these binary signatures or if I can invest my time into something
that's
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 10:29:32AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
I would speculate debsigs got a name change to dpkg-sig. Can somebody
confirm or deny?
As Mark said, it's not a name change. The FAQ on the dpkg-sig site
(http://dpkg-sig.turmzimmer.net/) has more info.
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 07:35:11PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 04:48:52PM -0800, Erast Benson wrote:
this URL also does _neither_ offer access to the apt
(0.6.40.1-1.1) nor your patched debhelper (4.9.3elatte) as requested in my
other mail.
I'm personally
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 08:45:52AM -0800, Erast Benson wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 15:51 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(a) to ship packaged OpenSolaris core on main CD, and the rest of
GPL-filtered software, will go on Companion CD, or through APT
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:51:31AM -0800, Erast Benson wrote:
The great thing about CDDL is that it is file based. So, all files which
are licensed under CDDL-terms works exactly as GPL does. i.e. any change
made by anybody (including propriatery distributors) *must* be contributed
back to the
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:31:08PM -0800, Erast Benson wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 22:19 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
Or, *freedoms*. If a hardware vendor wants to profit from Linux users,
they need to lift the limitations on the access to knowledge about their
wares.
Please wake up.
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 06:21:12PM -0800, Erast Benson wrote:
read some more GPL vs. CDDL legality stuff on our web site at
http://www.gnusolaris.org/gswiki/GNU/Solaris_Resources
Authorization Required
This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document
requested.
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 06:31:00PM -0800, Erast Benson wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 01:14 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Alex Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Banck wrote:
If so, do you plan to use Debian's mailing lists and bug
tracking system for development?
No. We have
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:52:07PM -0800, Erast Benson wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 21:25 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Alex Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The issue... what issue? The http://www.sun.com/gnome issue? The
numerous-our-examples issue?
Of course, that's an
1 - 100 of 423 matches
Mail list logo
