> "Ivan" == Ivan Shmakov writes:
>> Having a bunch of problem reports that no one is interested in
>> cluttering up package pages has a cost. Just for the same
>> reasons you don't want these reports cluttering up your bugs from
>> page, I perhaps don't want them cluttering
> On 2023-03-23 05:30:01 +0100, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2023, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>> It would’ve likely helped me if #1006801 were listed on
>> http://bugs.debian.org/src:tinysshd .
>> (I’m not entirely sure as to /why/ it got archived, TBH: it’s found in
>> 20190101-1,
On Fri, 17 Mar 2023, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> For an example, I’ve once spent hours trying to determine the cause of
> a particular problem I was having. Turns out tinysshd(8) from Bullseye
> has an interoperability issue with openssh-client from the same. It
> would’ve likely helped me if #1006801
> On 2023-03-01 16:30:01 +0100, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Honestly, if there is not currently a submitter behind a bug---someone
> who cares about it and is willing to look into requests for more
> information or to help confirm a fix---I'm not particularly interested
> in working on such a
On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 16:56 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> This is my viewpoint too, and why I don't plan on implementing or
> accepting a patch to do nosubmitter unless someone can convince me
> otherwise.
The use-case presented in the thread seems reasonable to me; when you
are submitting a bug
On Wed, 01 Mar 2023, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Honestly, if there is not currently a submitter behind a bug […]
> that's often a sign the bug should be closed until someone comes along
> who cares about the issue enough to interact with it.
This is my viewpoint too, and why I don't plan on
On 01/03/23 16:22, Sam Hartman wrote:
Socially and culturally I do want to emphasize the idea that if you
aren't willing (any more) to put energy behind your problem report, it's
entirely fine if no one is going to put energy behind fixing it.
That seems to me like a perfectly fine social
> "Gioele" == Gioele Barabucci writes:
Gioele> For example I have opened bugs years ago against packages
Gioele> that I do not use anymore. These reports are still valid and
Gioele> sometime others comment on them, but I would no longer be
Gioele> able to, for example,
On Tue, 2023-02-28 at 18:36 +0100, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> Should there be a standard email address for "I'm reporting this because
> I noticed it, but I'm not interested in it"-bug reports?
Similar to the BTS noowner command, perhaps add a nosubmitter command?
--
bye,
pabs
Should there be a standard email address for "I'm reporting this because
I noticed it, but I'm not interested in it"-bug reports?
Orphaned packages get their maintainer address set to
. Shouldn't something similar be available for bugs?
For example I have opened bugs years ago against
10 matches
Mail list logo
