Control: tags 1029085 + wontfix
Control: close 1029085
Hi Scott,
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 02:52:49PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> It's not policy compliant, which may be okay in this instance, but it
> certainly isn't ideal.
I looked into this and figured that indeed the Debian Policy has a
On January 17, 2023 2:39:32 PM UTC, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>Hi Jonathan,
>
>Thanks for your review.
>
>On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 02:12:10PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>> I'm not sure that alternatives is appropriate, if the commands are not
>> interchangeable. And they are not: if you have 1 &
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for your review.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 02:12:10PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I'm not sure that alternatives is appropriate, if the commands are not
> interchangeable. And they are not: if you have 1 & 2 installed on a
> host, and have used one to create some backups,
(setting CC according to X-Debbugs-CC, not sure if appropriate since
posting via -devel, but well, I don't think we should have ITP's on
-devel anyway.)
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 02:32:13PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
The root of this ITP is #1019950.
The crux of the matter is that borg 2.x
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Helmut Grohne
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, team+b...@tracker.debian.org,
Gianfranco Costamagna , Danny Edel
The root of this ITP is #1019950.
The crux of the matter is that borg 2.x is not very compatible with borg
1.x. I talked to
5 matches
Mail list logo
