On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 09:45:32AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Wouter Verhelst:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 06:38:00PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> It would also make the package unmaintainable if the original packer
> >> loses interest, so the package would not be suitable for
* Wouter Verhelst:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 06:38:00PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> It would also make the package unmaintainable if the original packer
>> loses interest, so the package would not be suitable for inclusion in
>> a stable release.
>
> Eh, it doesn't?
>
> A CLA is "you're
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 06:38:00PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> It would also make the package unmaintainable if the original packer
> loses interest, so the package would not be suitable for inclusion in
> a stable release.
Eh, it doesn't?
A CLA is "you're allowed to change this, but if you
On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 15:46 +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Can a Debian Package Maintainer require CLA for accepting packaging
> changes and distro patches to be uploaded into Debian itself?
>
> (case in point, debian maintainer & upstream wear the same hat, and
> maintain upstream code &
On 2/14/20 4:46 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Can a Debian Package Maintainer require CLA for accepting packaging
> changes and distro patches to be uploaded into Debian itself?
you can always fork the current packaging and upload/NMU it.
Send patches to the BTS or open an issue in github,
In this instance, I'd submit a patch to the bts and see what happens.
--Sam
* Andrey Rahmatullin:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 06:38:00PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> It would also make the package unmaintainable if the
>> original packer loses interest, so the package would not be suitable
>> for inclusion in a stable release.
> Can you explain why do you think so?
>
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 06:38:00PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> It would also make the package unmaintainable if the
> original packer loses interest, so the package would not be suitable
> for inclusion in a stable release.
Can you explain why do you think so?
If a new maintainer wants to use a
* Scott Kitterman:
> On February 14, 2020 3:46:18 PM UTC, Dimitri John Ledkov
> wrote:
>>Can a Debian Package Maintainer require CLA for accepting packaging
>>changes and distro patches to be uploaded into Debian itself?
>>
>>(case in point, debian maintainer & upstream wear the same hat, and
On February 14, 2020 3:46:18 PM UTC, Dimitri John Ledkov
wrote:
>Can a Debian Package Maintainer require CLA for accepting packaging
>changes and distro patches to be uploaded into Debian itself?
>
>(case in point, debian maintainer & upstream wear the same hat, and
>maintain upstream code &
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 03:46:18PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Can a Debian Package Maintainer require CLA for accepting packaging
> changes and distro patches to be uploaded into Debian itself?
>
> (case in point, debian maintainer & upstream wear the same hat, and
> maintain upstream
Can a Debian Package Maintainer require CLA for accepting packaging
changes and distro patches to be uploaded into Debian itself?
(case in point, debian maintainer & upstream wear the same hat, and
maintain upstream code & packaging on github.com, under a company org
with a CLA bot, rejecting
12 matches
Mail list logo
