Hi there!
Juliusz, it is better to point your question to the *maintainer* of the
package, not to debian-devel@ (which is not a mandatory mailing list for
all the maintainers). Adding the Debian Common Lisp team to the loop.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:25:19 +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
It seems that
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:12:01 +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.jussieu.fr
wrote:
There is always the option of either recruiting one of those
disappointed users to maintain the package, or doing it yourself.
Thanks for the suggestion -- but I'm already spending all of my
proverbial
Hi,
I'm upstream for Cedilla [1,2], which has been orphaned and removed from
Sid. I'm receiving e-mail from Debian users of Cedilla, asking me what
is the suggested replacement. What shall I answer?
--Juliusz
[1] http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/cedilla/
[2]
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 07:14:39PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
I'm upstream for Cedilla [1,2], which has been orphaned and removed from
Sid. I'm receiving e-mail from Debian users of Cedilla, asking me what
is the suggested replacement. What shall I answer?
See
On 01/25/2011 02:36 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 07:14:39PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
I'm upstream for Cedilla [1,2], which has been orphaned and removed from
Sid. I'm receiving e-mail from Debian users of Cedilla, asking me what
is the suggested replacement.
Thanks to both of you -- I've forwarded your messages to my (soon-to-be
former, sigh) users.
--Juliusz
pgpdCt7J6BkEQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 01/25/2011 03:09 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Thanks to both of you -- I've forwarded your messages to my (soon-to-be
former, sigh) users.
Minus the false hits from my search, I hope? My main point was to
illustrate debtags is a nice tool for finding related packages (some
time I'll try to
Hi Juliusz,
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:09:43 +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.jussieu.fr
wrote:
Thanks to both of you -- I've forwarded your messages to my (soon-to-be
former, sigh) users.
There is always the option of either recruiting one of those disappointed
users to maintain the package,
There is always the option of either recruiting one of those
disappointed users to maintain the package, or doing it yourself.
Thanks for the suggestion -- but I'm already spending all of my
proverbial Copious Free Time on upstream work.
It seems a shame to lose a bug-free package when you
* Andrey Rahmatullin [2011-01-25 23:36 +0500]:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 07:14:39PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
I'm upstream for Cedilla [1,2], which has been orphaned and removed from
Sid. I'm receiving e-mail from Debian users of Cedilla, asking me what
is the suggested replacement.
10 matches
Mail list logo
