On 05/04/13 14:06, Ian Jackson wrote:
Daniel Pocock writes (SI units (was Re: failure to communicate)):
It may actually be useful for the technical committee to review what is
on the wiki and make some general statement about Debian's position (if
they haven't done so in the past
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/13 22:43, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting ian_br...@fastmail.net (ian_br...@fastmail.net):
If Debian bug report #684128 proves anything, it is that you will never
convince anyone with technical argument, facts advanced in support of
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 11:26:29AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
It may actually be useful for the technical committee to review what is
on the wiki and make some general statement about Debian's position (if
they haven't done so in the past), and that can guide the way similar
bugs are
Can we *PLEASE* stop making new threads. It's getting *REALLY* hard to
keep playing whack-a-mole with my bozo bin.
Keep it all on the same thread. We don't need to 5 threads about this
nonsense. It's starting to get annoying.
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 11:26:29AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 04/05/2013 04:43 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Nothing proves that the patches you proposed will be ignored *after*
the release of wheezy.
Christian,
Not fixing this bug would be a very bad move, because it can lead
to having partitions not aligned to a 4K boundary, meaning that
your system
Daniel Pocock writes (SI units (was Re: failure to communicate)):
It may actually be useful for the technical committee to review what is
on the wiki and make some general statement about Debian's position (if
they haven't done so in the past), and that can guide the way similar
bugs
On 4 April 2013 20:47, ian_br...@fastmail.net wrote:
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 19:09:04 +0200
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
This mail is a very good argument to confirm that overcomplicated
methods to make your point will just fail.
If you have a point to make it, make ti. Once.
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 07:28:32AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Can we *PLEASE* stop making new threads. It's getting *REALLY* hard to
keep playing whack-a-mole with my bozo bin.
Fix your mailer… I see precisely one thread, correctly linked together
via message-id and references headers, with
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 07:37:19PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Nothing proves that the patches you proposed will be ignored *after*
the release of wheezy.
Christian,
Not fixing this bug would be a very bad move, because it can lead
to having partitions not aligned to a 4K boundary,
On 04/05/2013 10:40 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 07:37:19PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Not fixing this bug would be a very bad move, because it can lead to having
partitions not aligned to a 4K boundary, meaning that your system would be
slow.
If any tools don't
On 04/05/2013 07:59 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
The default to base-10 units, is good as majority of the installer
deals with HDD drives (not SSD) and not RAM.
Come on... it's not! Let's be serious 5 minutes here.
There isn't even a warning about which units are in use.
This fools our users (me
Hi Thomas,
Le vendredi, 5 avril 2013 17.52:19, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
On 04/05/2013 07:59 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
And all of these features will only land for the next cycle
with a release in ~= 2 years time.
I really hope that it wont be the case. That it doesn't go into
Debian
o...@debian.org a écrit :
You want that bug fixed? Great: test the patch, document your tests
I did all that.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684128#103
gather feedback, get involved
quoting from the above:
I would be interested to hear suggestions as to what sort of
On 04/05/2013 10:40 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 07:37:19PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Nothing proves that the patches you proposed will be ignored *after*
the release of wheezy.
Christian,
Not fixing this bug would be a very bad move, because it can lead
to
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 02:50:19AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Nothing proves that the patches you proposed will be ignored *after*
the release of wheezy.
Christian,
Not fixing this bug would be a very bad move, because it can lead
to having partitions not aligned to a 4K boundary,
On 04/06/2013 12:16 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Le vendredi, 5 avril 2013 17.52:19, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
On 04/05/2013 07:59 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
And all of these features will only land for the next cycle
with a release in ~= 2 years time.
I really hope that it
[ Not answering all occurrences, things got repeated a few times… ]
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org (06/04/2013):
I've wrote that we should at least address the issue, in a way or
another, through the next point release if that is safer.
It is not.
But, are you seriously proposing that we
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 19:09:04 +0200
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
This mail is a very good argument to confirm that overcomplicated
methods to make your point will just fail.
If you have a point to make it, make ti. Once. With facts.
I supplied plenty of facts.
Quoting ian_br...@fastmail.net (ian_br...@fastmail.net):
If Debian bug report #684128 proves anything, it is that you will never
convince anyone with technical argument, facts advanced in support of
Sorry, but Debian bug #684128 only proves one thing : that we (the D-I
team) were mostly trying
19 matches
Mail list logo
