On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 09:43:48PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
...
A distribution (any, most) is the gel that binds and gives an unified
and coherent shape to the software ecosystem.
+1 (to everything even the cutted part)
An app store is just like
a scrapyard, you might find magnificent
On 2013-04-24 12:43, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi!
On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 11:05:29 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
[...]. IMO this is why upstream packaging should be
embraced and enhanced rather than focusing on dpkg.
I'm not sure if you refer to the tool here, or to the packaging work,
doesn't change
Le Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 01:50:58AM -0700, Clint Byrum a écrit :
My suggestion is not to stop packaging, but to shift focus
from make an awesome package to make an awesome upstream that
results in an automatically generated awesome package. Debhelper and
many of the other tools definitely
Quoting Andreas Tille (2013-04-25 09:20:59)
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 09:43:48PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
...
A distribution (any, most) is the gel that binds and gives an unified
and coherent shape to the software ecosystem.
+1 (to everything even the cutted part)
An app store is
On 25-04-13 10:50, Clint Byrum wrote:
On 2013-04-24 12:43, Guillem Jover wrote:
All of the things you mention are huge accomplishments, but the scope is
what I am suggesting has gotten out of hand. Do we really need a high
level view and QA of the entire system for MongoDB?
We don't need it
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:00:11PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Andreas Tille (2013-04-25 09:20:59)
I honestly wonder if there is some more general definition for the
term app store besides what according to[1] certain companies have
made out of it. Following the logic
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 02:40:38PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
understandable to him: What is an operating system. (Hey, also Windows
is no operating system - it is just a kick-starter for Windows, Excel, a
browser and a mail client, right?)
s/for Windows, Excel/for Word, Excel/
Kind
On 04/25/2013 09:40 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
There are actually users who do not see the system but just the
topping.
Yes, but I don't think we should encourage any users in this skewed view
of the system.
I would never try to blame the user about this.
Nor would I. However, I would not use
Hi!
On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 11:05:29 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
[...]. IMO this is why upstream packaging should be
embraced and enhanced rather than focusing on dpkg.
I'm not sure if you refer to the tool here, or to the packaging work,
doesn't change much anyway.
I once worked on the 'pkgme'
9 matches
Mail list logo
