It seems like this will cause the mirrors carrying 1.0 to download
the whole tree again. If we're going to do that, perhaps we should
have the debian-development (or whatever) be the directory tree and
debian-1.whatever be a symlink to it. That way, the next bump of
the version number
Making the parent directory unreadable caused mirror programs to not mirror
that directory. They might mirror the symlink, but it won't do much good.
Bruce
--
Visit the Toy Story Web Page! http://www.toystory.com
On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, Bruce Perens wrote:
Making the parent directory unreadable caused mirror programs to not mirror
that directory. They might mirror the symlink, but it won't do much good.
Although they could mirror if they had a special userid/password (as I
believe has been set up)---they
Michael Alan Dorman writes:
Michael Although they could mirror if they had a special userid/password
Michael (as I believe has been set up)---they would just have to do it in
Michael multiple parts...
As the maintainer of the mirror package, I am happy to confirm that you do
not need an
On Sun, 10 Dec 1995 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there is interest I can post my ftp.debian.org file for mirror.
--
Dirk Eddelb|ttel
http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/~edd
I prefer that they use the extra accounts instead of a single file that
will do all the
On Fri, 8 Dec 1995, Bruce Perens wrote:
I think we should deprecate 1.0 and bump the version number to 1.1, so
that authentic copies of the release are not confused with the one on
the Infomagic CD.
This is a good idea.
Regarding the use of a code name for the release: Considering what's
On Sat, 9 Dec 1995, Bill Mitchell wrote:
It seems like this will cause the mirrors carrying 1.0 to download
the whole tree again. If we're going to do that, perhaps we should
have the debian-development (or whatever) be the directory tree and
debian-1.whatever be a symlink to it. That way,
I think we should deprecate 1.0 and bump the version number to 1.1, so that
authentic copies of the release are not confused with the one on the Infomagic
CD.
I still haven't heard from Ian Murdock, who is moving his residence and no
doubt busy. Does anyone have a way for me to reach him?
Bruce Perens writes:
Bruce Yes, a code name would be a good idea. Let's hold off on that until
Bruce Ian Murdock can do it - I've stuck my neck out enough today.
We could also hide in private/project.
--
Dirk Eddelb|ttelhttp://qed.econ.queensu.ca/~edd
9 matches
Mail list logo
