Bug#262596: marked as forwarded ([INSTALL-INFO] support documents with more than one section)

2008-03-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:36:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the report #139569, regarding [INSTALL-INFO] support documents with more than one section to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) (NB: If you are a system

Bug#366555: dpkg-source: Timestamps on documentation advance artificially

2008-03-18 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, A. Costa wrote: The long bug log clearly says that there's no point to try to conserve timestamps for generated documentation. And I agree with that. Time permitting, would you kindly tell me where it says that? I reread the whole BTS log for #366555 yesterday, but

Bug#471488: dpkg: status fd (--status-fd n) should not be inherited by childs (scripts)

2008-03-18 Thread Vaclav Ovsik
Package: dpkg Version: 1.14.16.6 Severity: normal Hi, when analysing SELinux audit log I found, that post,pre...install... scripts inherits the file-descriptor of pipe between apt and dpkg. This descriptor causes the SELinux audit message: audit(1205849195.192:35): avc: denied { write } for

Bug#139569: marked as forwarded ([INSTALL-INFO] support documents with more than one section)

2008-03-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:36:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the report #139569, regarding [INSTALL-INFO] support documents with more than one section to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) (NB: If you are a system

Bug#180127: marked as forwarded ([INSTALL-INFO] support new direntry format)

2008-03-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:36:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the report #139569, regarding [INSTALL-INFO] support new direntry format to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no

Bug#366555: dpkg-source: Timestamps on documentation advance artificially

2008-03-18 Thread A. Costa
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:11:22 +0100 Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The long bug log clearly says that there's no point to try to conserve timestamps for generated documentation. And I agree with that. Time permitting, would you kindly tell me where it says that? I reread the whole

Bug#4989: Fotoshop CS3 in Internet Explorer

2008-03-18 Thread Sidney Snyder
paragon partition manager 9 Pro - 39 roxio toast titanium 8 - 39 adobe photoshop cs3 extended - 89 lynda.com photoshop lightroom essential training - 29 adobe flash cs3 professional - 59 roxio easy media creator 8 - 39 `` check alloem4less . com symantec antivirus corporate 10 - 29 2003 microsoft