Hi Ted,
Ted Ts'o wrote:
1) Suppose package contains files a, b, and c. Which are you
doing?
a) extract a.dpkg-new ; fsync(a.dpkg-new); rename(a.dpkg-new, a);
extract b.dpkg-new ; fsync(b.dpkg-new); rename(b.dpkg-new, b);
extract c.dpkg-new ; fsync(c.dpkg-new); rename(c.dpkg-new,
* Betr.: Re: Bug#605009: serious performance regression with ext4 (Fri, 26
Nov 2010 16:33:06 +0100):
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Mathias Behrle wrote:
* Betr.: Re: Bug#605009: serious performance regression with ext4 (Fri,
26 Nov 2010 15:53:27 +0100):
That was ok everywhere except on
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
c) extract(a.dpkg-new);
extract(b.dpkg-new);
extract(c.dpkg-new);
fsync(a.dpkg-new);
fsync(b.dpkg-new);
fsync(c.dpkg-new);
rename(a.dpkg-new, a);
rename(b.dpkg-new, b);
rename(c.dpkg-new, c);
(c)
Hi!
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 16:52:54 -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 03:53:27PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Just to sum up what dpkg --unpack does in 1.15.8.6:
1/ set the package status as half-installed/reinst-required
2/ extract all the new files as *.dpkg-new
3/ for all
* Betr.: Fw: Bug#605009: serious performance regression with ext4 (Fri, 26
Nov 2010 22:15:06 +0100):
* Betr.: Re: Bug#605009: serious performance regression with ext4 (Fri, 26
Nov 2010 16:33:06 +0100):
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Mathias Behrle wrote:
* Betr.: Re: Bug#605009: serious
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Ted Ts'o ty...@mit.edu wrote:
I am guessing you are doing (a) today --- am I right? (c) or (d)
would be best.
Are there any plans to provide an API for atomic (non-durable) file
updates, not involving fsync?
Would be simpler (for apps), faster and more general
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 605099 pending
Bug #605099 [dpkg] [l10n] Updated Czech dpkg translation
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
605099: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605099
tag 605099 pending
thanks
Hello,
Bug #605099 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=b3d0622
---
commit b3d062225c0144d28747a48bd82a5108ada1439a
Hi!
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 13:14:53 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.8.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n
While translating dpkg to Romanian I stumbled across a few things that
you might want to consider:
Please keep submitting any other such strings that seem
Quoting Guillem Jover (guil...@debian.org):
#: lib/dpkg/ehandle.c:107
msgid out of memory pushing error handler:
What is this? Could you please add a note/explanation for translators or
rephrase?
Changed to out of memory for new error context, hope it's slightly
better?
I guess
10 matches
Mail list logo