-maintainer upload.
+ * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition.
+
+ -- Steve Langasek Wed, 31 Jan 2024 19:27:02 +
+
libabigail (2.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Update from the 2.4 branch:
diff -Nru libabigail-2.4/debian/control libabigail-2.4/debian/control
--- libabigail-2.4/debian
the fact that gcc-python-plugin was not
previously using the cflags from dpkg-buildflags for the build, which seems
kind of important!
I've uploaded this patch to Ubuntu. Please consider including it in Debian
as well.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
2020-02-20 21:44:49.0 -0800
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+Description: fix compatibility with Python 3.8
+ Python 3.8 changes the type of an element of the PyTypeObject struct
+ (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0590/) leading to compiler errors.
+Author: Steve Langasek
+Last-Update: 2020-02
the CPU requirements for the armel port to armv7 also make
that port completely redundant; at that point it's just a slow armhf with no
advantages.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world
error prone).
I know it's part of the patch that Matthias is in the process of discussing
with upstream. So yes, I think it's being upstreamed though that doesn't
mean it's been accepted yet.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:10:35PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
the build of src:db on powerpc failed[1] because:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:25, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
It's a (multiarch) bug in gcc-defaults; /usr/lib/libgcj_bc.so.1 in the
libgcj-bc metapackage points at /usr
?
I haven't yet encountered any cases where this matters for gcc, so I would
recommend only changing cpp for now.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
cpp Multi-Arch: allowed
instead, and let me know what my error is. :)
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp
Hi Matthias,
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 12:03:36AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Some time ago I asked Steve Langasek to verify what output of:
$ gcc -v /dev/null | grep ^LIBRARY_PATH
will return on the multiarch system. Basically, cmake parses it and loads
implicit link directories from
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
I chanced to notice that the gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg and gcc-4.2-doc-non-dfsg
source packages are still present in unstable. gcc-4.2 hasn't been included
in Debian since lenny, and gcc-4.1 has been removed from unstable
post-squeeze. The documentation ought
as far as multiarch
support is concerned.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
for implementation and the interface packages should use to query these
paths.
Cc:ing the respective maintainer mailing lists for sign-off.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:12:27AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Attached is a backport to gcc-4.4 of all my multiarch changes to date for
gcc-4.5.
Here is a further set of changes to be applied on top of the previous patch.
The previous upload of multiarch gcc-4.4 to Ubuntu showed a couple
versioned build-dependency, which will
only be active once we get to stage2 of the bootstrapping, will need to be
updated with the correct libc-dev version number once that's actually in the
archive - rather than using the version number of the eglibc in my Ubuntu
PPA.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
.
Is that the case, or should I prepare gcc-4.4 patches as well?
Please cc: me on replies as I'm not subscribed to debian-gcc.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu
-config for
linking.
I don't argue that this makes --as-needed *correct* as a default, but I
think it's clear how using --as-needed may benefit a distribution in terms
of reducing churn when library dependencies change.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
this
submitted for inclusion in the Debian package.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:01:32AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Dnia czwartek, 29 lipca 2010 o 02:13:24 Steve Langasek napisał(a):
Trying to get ready for the next stage of multiarch deployment, I ran into
a couple of problems with the packaging of multiarch support in gcc-4.4.
Namely
not subscribed to debian-gcc.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
ftpmasters to use as well.)
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
to be added to the
package in the next upload, per the recent announcement regarding lintian
enforcement at archive accept time.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
with existing kernels for lenny, we're better off not
making gcc-4.3 the default compiler on the affected archs.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
to build under g++-4.3, though.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 02:44:00PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-29 11:08]:
nmv-sess-mgr.cc: In member function 'virtual void
nemiver::SessMgr::store_session(nemiver::ISessMgr::Session,
nemiver::common::Transaction)':
nmv-sess
have
several of those in use.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED
tags 438066 -moreinfo
tags 438436 moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 04:59:29PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
tag 438066 + moreinfo
thanks
please recheck with 4.2 and 4.3/snapshot
Forwarding to the right bug.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
* for over a month now due to build failures that look like they are
probably a gcc bug, thereby preventing security fixes (and updates to 27
other significant packages) from reaching testing.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
an answer?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=123;bug=428582
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
not; this discussion doesn't seem to be cc:ed to debian-mips?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
.
m68k fails when building with gcc-4.1 4.1.2-12 with the error you listed
above.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
xulrunner,
AFAICS. Even if the bug belongs to gcj-4.1, this change in xulrunner's
behavior is grounds for not letting the new xulrunner into etch. Security
updates need to not break related packages.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
that breaks
the other packages.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
precedence in the case of a conflict.
I'm ready to upload version with 'Conflicts+Replaces' at any moment if
needed.
I think that would still be best.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
(#403328); the only change from previous version
is addition of missing Conflicts: entry.
I don't understand why this is listed as a Conflicts:, instead of as a
Conflicts: + Replaces:. Matthias, could you please comment?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free
, but otherwise things look OK. I would recommend we include
this patch. I'm not sure there's any point submitting it upstream
until the ARM libffi bits go; not sure what status on that is.
Beautiful! I'll happily grant a freeze exception for this fix, FWIW. :)
--
Steve Langasek
on this; so in the absence of any movement in this area, I still need to
know what Debian is going to do with gcj on ARM for the upcoming etch
release.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 01:11:24PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Steve Langasek writes:
so in the absence of any movement in this area, I still need to
know what Debian is going to do with gcj on ARM for the upcoming etch
release.
in the worst case, remove the binaries built from gcj-4.1
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 01:23:17PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Steve Langasek writes:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 01:18:35AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Please consider moving the following packages to testing:
gcj-4.1
I'm wondering whether the build-dependencies of gcj-4.1 are really
. changes from upstream svn are included as a diff.
Ok, thanks for the clarification. gcj-4.1 4.1.1-17 is unblocked, in
anticipation of the arm upload.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can
where you've dropped it).
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
error on the buildd; given back now.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
as a non-issue? The grep command
isn't sufficient to tell that there are any invariant sections or cover
texts here.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
=default. ecj-bootstrap did build on the
buildd.
This means the version of gcj-4.1 is still RC-buggy and will presumably
require a freeze exception for etch; documenting this in the BTS.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
release without rapid
improvement.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
needed for *all* architectures, or
could gcc-4.0 still be dropped on some architectures where the kernel is
already using gcc-4.1?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
for
binary cleanup. Please remove these packages from debian/control when
they're no longer being built.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
to be determined. In the
meantime, I think it's best to reassign this back to qt-x11-free.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
and the symlink.
That sounds like a terrible amount of complexity to me. I can't imagine why
it would ever be beneficial to carry more than one version of gcjwebplugin
around in the archive at a time.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
otherwise.
Is gcjwebplugin in a presentable state yet? Last I knew, it still had
serious security problems. (BTW, why does the plugin package need to have
the upstream version number in its name?)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
. you did write FTBFS, not fails to
build on buildd.
Packages that can't be built on clean buildds are RC-buggy, even if their
build-dependencies can be satisfied in some other way. sbuild will never
look at anything but the first branch of an ORed dependency, so this is a
serious bug.
--
Steve
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 04:47:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Falk Hueffner writes:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Matthias,
works for me.
Have you tried building it with prctl --unaligned=signal? This is not
the default on hppa, but it's used on the autobuilders
, which doesn't help us when we need a security upload
sometime...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 08:39:19AM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
retitle 369642 g++-4.0/alpha: -fvisibility-inlines-hidden segfaults on
reference to static method
thanks
Minimal test case attached, bug title updated accordingly. Build with g
,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
is to break out
the definition of the cleanup() method so that it doesn't get inlined.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
libgcc_s problem.
So removing gcc-4.1 from his build system isn't an option unless we find a
way to do this systemically for Debian.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL
having gcc-4.0 link against libgcc4 is out of the question?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
compatibility, while
making it clear that the upgrade to 2.6 needs to happen before the etch+1
release.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:20:38PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 13 April 2006 22:59, Steve Langasek wrote:
I think etch should support 2.4 in the sense of upgrade support only;
i.e., it should support 2.4 because we need to be able to install etch
on systems running sarge 2.4 kernels
in the archive.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data
but if I run 'sudo apt-listchanges' it works! Same for all other
affected programs.
Do you have LD_PRELOAD or LD_LIBRARY_PATH variables set in your user
environment?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 05:23:24PM -0400, Carlos Moffat wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 13:50 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 10:16:17AM -0400, Carlos Moffat wrote:
I'm seeing the same behavior, although my ldconfig is up
truly interchangeable.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:23:40PM +0100, Christian E. Boehme wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 08:36:05PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Huh? Are you really suggesting that the standard C++ compiler has been
unable to find any of its own header files for over a week in unstable, and
no one
Please don't drop the BTS from the recipient list when replying.
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 04:27:46AM +0100, Christian E. Boehme wrote:
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 05:49:43PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Then you're obviously doing something wrong, but you haven't actually told
us what you're
.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
right now -- we really need to have support for
multiarch in dpkg an apt before usefully proceeding further.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
for the upgrade path
when (...if) dpkg is extended to support installing Arch: i386 multiarch
debs directly on amd64? I suppose it should just be a Replaces:, but it
still seems like it will be an extra unnecessary transition.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
if multiarch happened, so
that making a lib multiarch-safe only required adjusting the paths the
package installs to, consistently across *all* architectures, and no more
fiddling with package names and doing double-builds on each architecture and
so on...
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
If there's
consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
/emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
My sense is that the concensus
packages.
For instance, there was no mention in the release team plans for etch:
Because it only affects a handful of packages that are using a non-default
compiler, which are being picked off one-by-one. :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
log, or do we
need to consider dropping hppa from the list of etch release archs at this
point?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
have to reconsider
hppa's status as a release port, so hopefully someone will have a chance to
look at this soon.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
libgcc2's fault? The BTS trail is pretty convoluted.
Yes, sorry. Let me quote Aurelien's last mail to 341675, which really
should have been sent to 342545:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:56:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
This is a bug
in the
package in question.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
is to
go for 1.33.1 in testing.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description
for these library packages?
(Apparently, these will then be the *real* c2 libraries... but also
incompatible with those already shipped by other Debian-derived distros
under that name, such as Ubuntu...) Do we have any notion of how many libs
are affected by this?
--
Steve Langasek
severity 335286 important
merge 335286 323133
thanks
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 09:59:30PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
reassign 335286 lilypond
thanks
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 08:49:17PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Compiling lilypond
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 11:18:00PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is the single most common build failure on arm, hppa, and m68k right
now, and has affected literally dozens or hundreds of other packages. I
do kinda know it on sight
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 12:41:18PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If the gcc maintainers think that pointing g++ at g++-3.4 on these archs is
the best option, I'm game. One disadvantage is that it wouldn't let us get
feedback about what else
this particular bug.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of the package, because
the current 3:4.0.2-2 version of libgcj6-dev for arm has
class ObjectInputStream$GetField;
on line 93 of /usr/include/c++/4.0.2/gcj/javaprims.h.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
++)
{
help_items[i].accelerator = NULL;
help_items[i].callback = menu_show_game_doc;
help_items[i].item_type = ;
}
Yeah, this smashes the stack. Just because it worked with gcc-3.3 doesn't
mean this is a gcc-4.0 bug.
--
Steve Langasek Give me
are able to use to
successfully compile this code in this environment with no other changes?
Have you confirmed that this bug exists in gcc-snapshot?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
python-crypto
Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dhis-client
Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gnutls12
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL
/Linux specific bug reporting instructions,
see URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0/README.Bugs.
make[2]: *** [video.lo] Error 1
This is a regression relative to g++-3.3_1:3.3.6-6, and appears to be
reported upstream as PR 21041.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
. The test case is derived from the failing code in
dhcp3 (bug #321987, #325605).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc-4.0 -g -o memcpytest ./memcpytest.c ./memcpytest
Bus error
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc-4.0 -DEXPLICIT_CAST -g -o memcpytest ./memcpytest.c
./memcpytest
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Thanks,
--
Steve
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:08:17PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 30.08.05
09:49:30:
When passing pointers to 4-byte types to memcpy(), gcc-4.0 generates
wrong code which assumes that these pointers are aligned at 4-byte
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:09:40AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:34:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
When passing pointers to 4-byte types to memcpy(), gcc-4.0 generates
wrong code which assumes that these pointers are aligned at 4-byte
boundaries for purposes
found 322565 4.0.1-3
notfound 322565 4.0.1-4
thanks
The bug in question manifested with gcc-4.0 4.0.1-3; the 4.0.1-4 version has
been built for arm, but not yet uploaded, so it's not currently known if
this particular ICE is addressed.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
Package: gcc
Version: 4:4.0.0-2
Severity: normal
The /usr/share/doc/gcc/README.Debian.gz file says:
Debian 3.2 (etch) is (mostly) built using the GCC 4.0.x compiler
collection.
It is not correct to assume that etch will be Debian 3.2. Please fix
this premature use of a version number. :)
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 04:29:50PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Steve Langasek writes:
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-2
Severity: important
jigdo is failing to build with g++-4.0 on m68k with the following error:
The unstable chroot on crest still has only g++-3.3 and g++-3.4
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-2
Severity: important
jigdo is failing to build with g++-4.0 on m68k with the following error:
g++ $cxx -c util/rsyncsum.cc -o util/rsyncsum.o
/usr/lib/gcc/m68k-linux-gnu/4.0.1/../../../../include/c++/4.0.1/bits/stl_bvector.h:
In member function 'std::_Bit_type*
please go ahead and upload those fixes to t-p-u. If there's other
evidence that one of the remaining fixes is RC, then go ahead and include it
as well.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
on IA-64. The current gcc 3.3.5 panics when
compiling threads.c
Are these linked to known problems within Debian packages, or suspected to
affect the buildability of binary packages currently in sarge?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/basic_string.h.
Fixing this reference allows gcc-3.4 to build from source again with current
doxygen. Patch attached.
This patch will be included in my upcoming NMU for bug #302995.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -uNr gcc-3.4-3.4.3.orig/debian/README.Debian
gcc-3.4-3.4.3
depends on kdelibs4, remains installable but is broken
And as it turns out, for a current example of kohlrabi, see kdoomsday or
amarok...
I don't know how deep the library dependency chain is on KDE, but it's
entirely possible that this problem applies all the way up.
--
Steve Langasek
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 11:52:25AM +0200, Achim Bohnet wrote:
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 10:31, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:15:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
A proposal for a simplification, which reduces/avoids the renaming of
the KDE packages. All KDE packages
removing the stale
binaries?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 09:20:14AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 03:44:39PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.4-12
Using this version of gcc-3.3, trying to combine '-static' with
'-Wl,-Bdynamic' as linker options to gcc on my alpha
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
