* Grant Grundler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-19 19:08]:
This is a good idea - switch to gcc-4.3 for everything but the kernel.
I didnt think this would be possible but I'm not sure why I thought that.
We use gcc-4.1 for the kernel anyway, rather than the default
compiler.
--
Martin Michlmayr
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 08:23:42AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Grant Grundler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-19 19:08]:
This is a good idea - switch to gcc-4.3 for everything but the kernel.
I didnt think this would be possible but I'm not sure why I thought that.
We use gcc-4.1 for the
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:54:13AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:11:30PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Have you narrowed done the problem to find if it is a gcc bug or a
kernel bug?
It fails with gcc-4.3, and works fine with all previous versions...
Don't get
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:33:08AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Grant Grundler writes:
...
Has anyone built a kernel with this version of gcc-4.3 and tried it?
Can I apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.3 on my hybrid system and get
Kyle McMartin a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:33:08AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Grant Grundler writes:
...
Has anyone built a kernel with this version of gcc-4.3 and tried it?
Can I apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.3 on my
Kyle McMartin a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:11:30PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Have you narrowed done the problem to find if it is a gcc bug or a
kernel bug?
It fails with gcc-4.3, and works fine with all previous versions...
I am actually asking that, because on the 3 problems
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:11:30PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Have you narrowed done the problem to find if it is a gcc bug or a
kernel bug?
It fails with gcc-4.3, and works fine with all previous versions...
Don't get me wrong though, I support switching to gcc-4.3 by default. If
Grant Grundler writes:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:53:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
...
FYI the glibc testsuite with gcc-4.3 on HPPA now gives the same results
than with gcc-4.2, except on one FPU test, due to a bug in the *glibc*.
So it *seems* HPPA is ready for gcc-4.3 by default.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Grant Grundler writes:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:53:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
...
FYI the glibc testsuite with gcc-4.3 on HPPA now gives the same results
than with gcc-4.2, except on one FPU test, due to a bug in
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:53:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
...
FYI the glibc testsuite with gcc-4.3 on HPPA now gives the same results
than with gcc-4.2, except on one FPU test, due to a bug in the *glibc*.
So it *seems* HPPA is ready for gcc-4.3 by default.
Has anyone built a kernel
Ludovic Brenta writes:
Now that gnat-4.3 is on all architectures, I would like to upload
gcc-defaults 1.70 making it the default on alpha, mips and mipsel as
for all other archs.
As is, gcc-defaults cannot enter testing because on alpha, mips and
mipsel, if depends on gnat-4.2 which is not
Matthias Klose a écrit :
Ludovic Brenta writes:
Now that gnat-4.3 is on all architectures, I would like to upload
gcc-defaults 1.70 making it the default on alpha, mips and mipsel as
for all other archs.
As is, gcc-defaults cannot enter testing because on alpha, mips and
mipsel, if depends
Now that gnat-4.3 is on all architectures, I would like to upload
gcc-defaults 1.70 making it the default on alpha, mips and mipsel as
for all other archs.
As is, gcc-defaults cannot enter testing because on alpha, mips and
mipsel, if depends on gnat-4.2 which is not in testing and has RC
bugs.
13 matches
Mail list logo