On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 06:22:17PM -0500, root wrote:
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 09:21:59AM -0500, root wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
root a écrit :
Is more information needed from me?
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 06:22:17PM -0500, root wrote:
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 09:21:59AM -0500, root wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
root a écrit :
Is more information needed from me? Or is there anything I can do to
expedite
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 09:21:59AM -0500, root wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
root a écrit :
Is more information needed from me? Or is there anything I can do to
expedite this bug fix? I've got 138 machines in an unstable state because
I can't do updates on them because
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 09:21:59AM -0500, root wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
root a écrit :
Is more information needed from me? Or is there anything I can do to
expedite this bug fix? I've got 138 machines in an unstable state
Is more information needed from me? Or is there anything I can do to
expedite this bug fix? I've got 138 machines in an unstable state because
I can't do updates on them because of this libc6 issue. If there is
anything that I can do, please let me know.
Thank you!
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010,
root a écrit :
Is more information needed from me? Or is there anything I can do to
expedite this bug fix? I've got 138 machines in an unstable state because
I can't do updates on them because of this libc6 issue. If there is
anything that I can do, please let me know.
I have to say I
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
root a écrit :
Is more information needed from me? Or is there anything I can do to
expedite this bug fix? I've got 138 machines in an unstable state because
I can't do updates on them because of this libc6 issue. If there is
anything that I can
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:08:08AM -0500, root wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-18
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
I'm running Debian Lenny with a stock 2.6.26-2 AMD64 kernel, and after upgrading any of
my systems to
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-18
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
I'm running Debian Lenny with a stock 2.6.26-2 AMD64 kernel, and after
upgrading any of my systems to use the latest libc6 package from
debian-security (2.7-18lenny2), all of my systems that use NIS can
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:08:08AM -0500, root wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-18
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
I'm running Debian Lenny with a stock 2.6.26-2 AMD64 kernel, and after
upgrading any of my systems to use the latest libc6 package from
10 matches
Mail list logo