On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 01:03:11AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Jérémy,
> I'd like to work on that package, however you left the repository in a
> protected state, so I just can't fix it.
>
> Either of those will work for me:
> - delete the repository
> - give to all other DD admin access
-1222118895
[1]
https://github.com/containers/oci-seccomp-bpf-hook/issues/99#issuecomment-1222140064
> On 8/22/22 12:16, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > Hi Reinhard and Dmitry,
> >
> >I'm packaging oci-seccomp-bpf-hook but it got rightly rejected by
> > ftp-mast
Hi Reinhard and Dmitry,
I'm packaging oci-seccomp-bpf-hook but it got rightly rejected by
ftp-masters because of incorrect debian/copyright. As result I opened an
issue [0] with upstream so to have actually _some_ copyright statement to
be included in the package.
As part of that discussion,
Go team admins,
for package golang-github-flowstack-go-jsonschema [0] I switched to
`git import-ref`, which does exactly what I think should be done for
a Go project without any vendor dir.
This changed the way the `upstream` branch is used, indeed it now
strictly follows the upstream commits.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 08:24:20AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:39:24PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > > The current salsa-CI setting is designed in a way that it checks
> > > that onupdating a package a reverse dep is not breaking (as things
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 04:22:52PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Hi,
Hey,
>
> The current salsa-CI setting is designed in a way that it checks
> that onupdating a package a reverse dep is not breaking (as things work this
> way in the
> go world) -- great.
>
> However, it still lacks the
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 07:41:34PM +, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-06-16 at 01:06 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 12:49 AM Domenico Andreoli
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Pirate,
> > >
> > > I'm attempting
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Domenico Andreoli
* Package name: golang-github-iovisor-gobpf
Version : 0.2.0-1
Upstream Author : IO Visor Project
* URL : https://github.com/iovisor/gobpf
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 10:43:35PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:11 AM Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> >
> > Dear DGPT,
> >
> > I see that dh-make-golang creates the `upstream` branch and an empty
> > commit "New upstream version..."
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Domenico Andreoli
* Package name: oci-seccomp-bpf-hook
Version : 1.2.5-1
Upstream Author : Valentin Rothberg, Daniel J. Walsh, et al.
* URL : https://github.com/containers/oci-seccomp-bpf-hook
* License : Apache-2.0
Hi Pirate,
I'm attempting to get gnostic updated but it needs a newer version
of golang-goprotobuf-dev.
I see you already packaged 1.5.2 and uploaded it to experimental.
For what reason did you go for experimental?
Do you have any plan for uploading it to unstable?
Is there anything I can help
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 05:20:54PM +0200, Alo??s Micard wrote:
> FYI the test runner is up again, we will gather metrics this week and then
> switch to a more permanent and proper solution.
>
I've just re-triggered a job [0] but the runner still looks offline:
| This job is stuck because you
ithout any change.
Instead I get this surprising history where upstream's v0.1.1 and
upstream/0.1.1 do not point to the same commit.
> commit 3ac6c51652986e7f14f0f5c31d67c3c1e7a6448f (tag: upstream/0.1.1,
> origin/upstream, go-team/upstream)
> Author: Domenico Andreoli
> Date: Fri Jun
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Domenico Andreoli
* Package name: golang-k8s-apimachinery
Version : 1.25.0~alpha0-1
Upstream Author : Kubernetes
* URL : https://github.com/kubernetes/apimachinery
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 02:37:51PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 10:28:13AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > I know I should not amend on a public repo, next time I'll do my dirty
> > stuff in a PR, but considering that the project
>
> I am not
Dear DGPT,
I'm having some friction with the process, I'm still adapting and I
need some help.
The bottom line is that I don't even go to the toilet without having
everything committed both locally and remotely.
Therefore the suggestion of dh-make-golang [0] of committing once the
intial
On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 05:13:39AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 5:10 AM Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> >
> > Dear DGPT,
> >
> > Moving my first steps as Go packager, packaging
> > golang-github-flowstack-go-jsonschema here.
> &
Dear DGPT,
Moving my first steps as Go packager, packaging
golang-github-flowstack-go-jsonschema here.
The build fails with this error:
_build/src/github.com/flowstack/go-jsonschema/schemas.go:11:13: pattern
schemas/draft-04.json: no matching files found
At those lines in schmas.go, I read:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Domenico Andreoli
* Package name: golang-github-flowstack-go-jsonschema
Version : 0.1.1-1
Upstream Author : FlowStack
* URL : https://github.com/flowstack/go-jsonschema
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 07:16:17PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 11:59:02AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > I'm asking admission to the Debian Go Packaging Team.
> > I recently started to use Kind [0] and I'd like to package it [1].
> > I already
Hi,
I'm asking admission to the Debian Go Packaging Team.
I recently started to use Kind [0] and I'd like to package it [1].
I already made request on Salsa.
Thanks,
Domenico
[0] https://kind.sigs.k8s.io/
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006737
--
rsa4096: 3B10 0CA1
21 matches
Mail list logo
