Re: Transitioning golang-goprotobuf to unstable?

2022-10-27 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 7:09 PM Peymaneh wrote: > > > Yes, it is not a direct dependency, Caddy requires > 1. golang-github-google-cel-go-dev, which requires > 2. golang-github-google-cel-spec-dev, which requires > 3. golang-goprotobuf-dev (>= 1.4.3~) > > i believe with with

Re: Transitioning golang-goprotobuf to unstable?

2022-10-27 Thread Peymaneh
Yes, it is not a direct dependency, Caddy requires 1. golang-github-google-cel-go-dev, which requires 2. golang-github-google-cel-spec-dev, which requires 3. golang-goprotobuf-dev (>= 1.4.3~) i believe with with golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5 superseeding golang-goprotobuf-dev (>= 1.4.3~)

Re: Transitioning golang-goprotobuf to unstable?

2022-02-01 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 1 February 2022 4:46:36 pm IST, Peymaneh wrote: >But I was wrong about the dependencies. Removing the dependency on >golang-github-google-cel-spec works out fine, but turns out >golang-github-google-cel-go still has indirect build-deps to golang-goprotobuf >1.4.1 via

Re: Transitioning golang-goprotobuf to unstable?

2022-02-01 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello, I'm in a similar situation where the experimental versions are needed to unblock updating to new upstream releases of mender (see #1004023 for details). I have very limited understanding how golang transitions work, but are familiar with regular shared object transitions. I assume some of

Re: Transitioning golang-goprotobuf to unstable?

2022-02-01 Thread Peymaneh
Am 31.01.22 um 20:26 schrieb Peymaneh: Am 31.01.22 um 14:45 schrieb Shengjing Zhu: On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 9:32 AM Peymaneh wrote: Yes, it is not a direct dependency, Caddy requires 1. golang-github-google-cel-go-dev, which requires 2. golang-github-google-cel-spec-dev, which requires 3.

Re: Transitioning golang-goprotobuf to unstable?

2022-01-31 Thread Daniel Swarbrick
Hi, On 30.01.22 20:54, Nilesh Patra wrote: I am aware the protobuf and friends golang packages (golang-goprotobuf, golang-gogoprotobuf et. al.) have drastic changes with even minor versions, and it is not very straightforward to migrate these, and hence I am unsure of what might be the best

Re: Transitioning golang-goprotobuf to unstable?

2022-01-31 Thread Peymaneh
Hi Am 31.01.22 um 14:45 schrieb Shengjing Zhu: On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 9:32 AM Peymaneh wrote: Yes, it is not a direct dependency, Caddy requires 1. golang-github-google-cel-go-dev, which requires 2. golang-github-google-cel-spec-dev, which requires 3. golang-goprotobuf-dev (>= 1.4.3~) I

Re: Transitioning golang-goprotobuf to unstable?

2022-01-31 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Hi On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 9:32 AM Peymaneh wrote: > > Yes, it is not a direct dependency, Caddy requires > 1. golang-github-google-cel-go-dev, which requires > 2. golang-github-google-cel-spec-dev, which requires > 3. golang-goprotobuf-dev (>= 1.4.3~) I see there are 2 problems. 1. For

Re: Transitioning golang-goprotobuf to unstable?

2022-01-30 Thread Peymaneh
Hi, Am 31.01.22 um 00:26 schrieb Shengjing Zhu: Nilesh Patra 于 2022年1月31日周一 04:10写道： Hi, Recently caddy was accepted into the archive, and in order for this to hit unstable, it needs the golang-goprotobuf package's version 1.4.3-1 which is not yet there in unstable. I just checked

Re: Transitioning golang-goprotobuf to unstable?

2022-01-30 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Nilesh Patra 于 2022年1月31日周一 04:10写道： > Hi, > > Recently caddy was accepted into the archive, and in order for this to hit > unstable, it needs the golang-goprotobuf package's version 1.4.3-1 which is > not yet there in unstable. > I just checked upstream go.mod file. It doesn't mention

Transitioning golang-goprotobuf to unstable?

2022-01-30 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi, Recently caddy was accepted into the archive, and in order for this to hit unstable, it needs the golang-goprotobuf package's version 1.4.3-1 which is not yet there in unstable. I am aware the protobuf and friends golang packages (golang-goprotobuf, golang-gogoprotobuf et. al.) have drastic