Re: HPPA and Squeeze

2009-06-19 Thread Kurt Roeckx
I take a regular look at various arches why packages are not correctly built. hppa is the most annoying arch for me. If you look at the stats you will notice that it's almost always the lowest in the stats. The reason it more or less keeps up is because I put alot of time in looking at the state

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

2009-06-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:15:26PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: So it's my understanding that the porters have no idea about the problems. So I will start to mail you about problems as soon as I see them and they look like porting issues specific to hppa. netgen fails to built with an internal

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

2009-06-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:15:26PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: So it's my understanding that the porters have no idea about the problems. So I will start to mail you about problems as soon as I see them and they look like porting issues specific to hppa. Ruby1.9 hangs in test_thread.rb

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

2009-06-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:02:54PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:15:26PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: So it's my understanding that the porters have no idea about the problems. So I will start to mail you about problems as soon as I see them and they look like

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

2009-07-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:43:24PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:15:26PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Here is a list of packages that failed to build because of instability on the buildds today: package | buildd | error qgit| penalosa | make

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

2009-07-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 09:28:00PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 08:57:56PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Did something change to peri? I'm currently only seeing them on penalosa. UP kernel, maybe? Both peri and penalosa run 2.6.29-2-parisc64-smp and from what I can tell

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

2009-07-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 03:52:16PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: And then there is glob2 that fails with: /usr/bin/ld: libgag/src/libgag.a(FileManager.o)(.text+0x2fc8): cannot reach f9bf_memcpy@@GLIBC_2.2+0, recompile with -ffunction-sections /usr/bin/ld:

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

2009-07-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 11:03:01PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 03:52:16PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: And then there is glob2 that fails with: /usr/bin/ld: libgag/src/libgag.a(FileManager.o)(.text+0x2fc8): cannot reach f9bf_memcpy@@GLIBC_2.2+0, recompile

Re: $USER and $LOGNAME unset in sbuild on goedel (alpha) and zandonai (s390) (and peri (hppa)?)

2011-03-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 08:29:11PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote: Hi! Some of the tests of lsh-utils failed on hppa, alpha, and s390 (https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lsh-utils) after I enabled them, the reason being that they expect $USER or $LOGNAME to be set. Is there

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-04-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:51:04PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:03:01PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: I'll make GCC 4.6 the default after the release of GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at least on amd64, armel, i386 and powerpc. If you do the switch, please

Re: DSA concerns for jessie architectures

2013-08-08 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 09:06:31PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: On 06/22/2013 07:26 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: * sparc: no working nflog (mild concern); no stable kernels in stable (compiling clisp for instance crashes the kernel reliably on smetana). We need to run sparc with oldstable

Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

2023-06-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Can I suggest that if you file a few bugs and add some information in it so that maybe someone can look at it? If it only affects one architecture, send a mail to that list asking for help. Kurt

Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

2023-06-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On June 18, 2023 11:37:55 PM GMT+02:00, Rob Landley wrote: >On 6/18/23 14:58, Rene Engelhard wrote: >>> Three years ago Samba maintainer Jeremy Allison lamented that "Both GPLv3 >>> and >>> the AGPL have been rejected soundly by most developers" and talked about >>> how he >>> regretted the

Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

2023-06-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 05:52:44AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Am 19.06.23 um 23:29 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > > > The pragmatic option would be to run only a smoketest for build success > > > on architectures not tested by upstream. > > > > And have Format->Character in Impress crash