Hello,
Thorsten Glaser, le mer. 06 déc. 2023 12:16:27 +0100, a ecrit:
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2023, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> >I have zero knowledge about hurd, but it looks like[1] hwclock is built
> >with CMOS support on hurd. So maybe it could work?
>
> Maybe it just needs a different config?
>
>
Chris,
Thanks
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 05:57:55PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> * Mark Hindley :
> > On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 06:06:41PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > Please note that the start target refers to a non-existing
> > > /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules. The correct
And on a Devuan/Ceres box:
dpkg -S /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/hwclock.rules
initscripts: /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/hwclock.rules
dpkg -S /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules
dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85-
hwclock.rules
On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 18:08 +0100, Svante
* Mark Hindley :
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 06:06:41PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > Please note that the start target refers to a non-existing
> > /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules. The correct file is
> > /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/hwclock.rules instead. That file contains a
> > reference
Martin,
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 06:06:41PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Please note that the start target refers to a non-existing
> /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules. The correct file is
> /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/hwclock.rules instead. That file contains a
> reference to rtc0 that
On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 16:52 +, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Martin,
>
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 06:06:41PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > Please note that the start target refers to a non-existing
> > /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules. The correct file is
> >
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 4:57 PM Mark Hindley wrote:
> I also propose downgrading the initscripts Depends: util-linux-extra to
> Recommends. Even on non-systemd systems, hwclock.sh is far from essential as
> many now use NTP and hwclock.sh already handles a missing /sbin/hwclock
> gracefully.
The
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 4:57 PM Mark Hindley wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 = patch
>
> Svante,
>
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 02:20:09PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On a qemu Hurd image:
> >
> > /sbin/hwclock --help | grep rtc
> > --directisa use the ISA bus instead of
Control: tags -1 = patch
Svante,
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 02:20:09PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On a qemu Hurd image:
>
> /sbin/hwclock --help | grep rtc
> --directisa use the ISA bus instead of /dev/rtc0 access
>
> /sbin/hwclock --directisa --show
> 2023-12-06
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:46 PM Svante Signell wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Svante Signell
> To: debian-init-divers...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2023 14:20:09 +0100
> Subject: Re: Bug#1057634: /sbin/hwclock: unrecogniz
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 12:07 +, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Thanks for your input.
>
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 11:56:56AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > * Mark Hindley [231206 11:42]:
> > > Is hwclock actually useful on Hurd? I (naively) expected it to be
Chris,
Thanks for your input.
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 11:56:56AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> * Mark Hindley [231206 11:42]:
> > Is hwclock actually useful on Hurd? I (naively) expected it to be linux
> > only. But src:util-linux still ships it[1]. Or is the HCTOSYS_DEVICE used
> > in
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>I have zero knowledge about hurd, but it looks like[1] hwclock is built
>with CMOS support on hurd. So maybe it could work?
Maybe it just needs a different config?
>Given this I'd imagine nobody has ever used the hwclock initscripts
>on hurd
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:42 PM Mark Hindley wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 11:16:57AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > Package: initscripts
> > Version: 3.08-3
> > Severity: important
> >
> > $ LC_ALL=C sudo invoke-rc.d hwclock.sh restart
> > Saving the system clock to /dev/rtc0.
> >
14 matches
Mail list logo
