Svante Signell, le mar. 12 juin 2018 09:10:31 +0200, a ecrit:
> On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 23:53 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le lun. 11 juin 2018 23:30:23 +0200, a ecrit:
> > >
> > > Building from source fails with:
> > > make[3]: *
On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 23:53 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le lun. 11 juin 2018 23:30:23 +0200, a ecrit:
> >
> > Building from source fails with:
> > make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'lwip/priv/tcpip_priv.h',
> > needed by
> > 'lwip-uti
> Since the lwip package got accepted
Great! :)
I found a bug that prevents using ssh, I hope I have the time to fix it soon...
Svante Signell, le lun. 11 juin 2018 23:30:23 +0200, a ecrit:
> On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 23:22 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Since the lwip package got accepted, I reuploaded the hurd package
> > with
> > the additional dependency, which thus brings us a new translator,
>
On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 23:22 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since the lwip package got accepted, I reuploaded the hurd package
> with
> the additional dependency, which thus brings us a new translator,
> /hurd/lwip, which you can start playing with!
Building
Hello,
Since the lwip package got accepted, I reuploaded the hurd package with
the additional dependency, which thus brings us a new translator,
/hurd/lwip, which you can start playing with!
Samuel
a
Unix interface. Yes, there is for instance #define pthread_cond_wait
pthread_hurd_cond_wait_np, but that's very simple tuning.
> About autoconf, the stack is distributed without any build system and
> the user is expected to provide its own solution. They have a repo called
> l
> > - Not intended to be upstream
> > autoconf
> > port
> Why not?
About port, it includes some stack configuration which is only valid for
us. About autoconf, the stack is distributed without any build system and
the user is expected to provide its own solution. They ha
Samuel Thibault, le mar. 01 mai 2018 01:34:42 +0200, a ecrit:
> > - Won't get to upstream
> > posix
>
> Similarly, why not?
If they really don't want it, we definitely should make this patch more
maitainable by avoiding to move code around, and instead put #ifdef
#endif around, so that changes
Hello,
Joan Lledó, le lun. 30 avril 2018 13:11:11 +0200, a ecrit:
> I've been working on the lwip package and have some patches for the release
> 2.0.3. These patches include:
Thanks!
I have applied them and fixed the build on Linux.
> About patches getting to upstream:
> -
Hello,
I've been working on the lwip package and have some patches for the release
2.0.3. These patches include:
- Solve some bugs on the PORT patch.
- Create a new macro wich allows the user to choose between POSIX or lwip
native socket headers.
- Solve the bug 36167 using the same solution
11 matches
Mail list logo
