is the last option), I must build it any time I want
to upgrade webalizer. That should be no prob, but I prefer not to compile.
I think my users will have no prob with english stats :P
Thanks anyway! :)
El Miércoles, 2 de Abril de 2003 20:21, Stephan Poehlsen escribió:
Hi,
you have to get the sources
is the last option), I must build it any time I want
to upgrade webalizer. That should be no prob, but I prefer not to compile.
I think my users will have no prob with english stats :P
Thanks anyway! :)
El Miércoles, 2 de Abril de 2003 20:21, Stephan Poehlsen escribió:
Hi,
you have to get the sources
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I were using a compiled version of webalizer, but now I'm using Debian, and
I'd like to use the Debian package for Webalizer. I've installed it, but I
don't know how to use the language support. I read in README this could be
done on configure
Hi,
you have to get the sources
apt-get source webalizer
and edit the file
emacs webalizer-2.01.10/debian/rules
in line 7 you can find the configure line for th new debian packages,
add
--with-language=german
or another language. Then build the package
cd webalizer-2.01.10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I were using a compiled version of webalizer, but now I'm using Debian, and
I'd like to use the Debian package for Webalizer. I've installed it, but I
don't know how to use the language support. I read in README this could be
done on configure
Hi,
you have to get the sources
apt-get source webalizer
and edit the file
emacs webalizer-2.01.10/debian/rules
in line 7 you can find the configure line for th new debian packages,
add
--with-language=german
or another language. Then build the package
cd webalizer-2.01.10
: webalizer stopped running
Tell us how and when webalizer is ran.
That's the problem I can't figure out what makes webalizer run. I see a
logrotate script at midnight. The webpages and .png files have current
dates
and are being updated daily. So webalizer *must* be running. But the stats
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Andrew P. Kaplan wrote:
I having problem with webalizer since the ip address of my Apache server was
changed last week. Apache is rotating the logs, the logs have current dates.
But the website stats only show activity up to the day of OLD ip address. I
don't care
logs under different ownership and group attribution -- thus
preventing both Webalizer and Analog from reading access.log, and
providing the usual report, and necessitating manual intervention to
change ownership. (Which fixes the problem.)
Anyone got a permanent fix for this behaviour?
(Or, more
Hi,
i'm looking for a web-log analyzer for potato and multiple virtual hosts.
webalizer keeps breaking (didn't create stats for some days, and then starts
again...),
analog is ugly, ...
and all need plain text log.
I can't suggest alternative loggers, but one of the reasons that
my
I can't suggest alternative loggers, but one of the reasons that
my webalizer kept breaking is because I had logrotate in the
/etc/cron.daily as well. l comes before w. I changed the name of
the logrotate script to 'zlogrotate' and webalizer hasn't had a
problem since.
Alternately, you
Hi Fellas
Can anyone tell me why webalizer 1.30 is ignoring hugh amounts
of records in my apache log files ?
Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
Craig
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bug in 1.30 version, uodate to 2.0 is a solution or there is a patch
floating about...
James
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Craig wrote:
Hi Fellas
Can anyone tell me why webalizer 1.30 is ignoring hugh amounts
of records in my apache log files ?
Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
Craig
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 10:51:43AM +0200, James wrote:
bug in 1.30 version, uodate to 2.0 is a solution or there is a patch
Yup. It ignores records after 20011004.
floating about...
Indeed. It's available on www.webalizer.org. Can't remember quite there.
Hassle with upgrading to 2.0 is
Hassle with upgrading to 2.0 is that, AFAIK, it'll trash your history for
that year (could be wrong...)
Actually, the repaired .deb package has made it to proposed updates in
stable and apt-get update, apt-get upgrade will install the fixed
package.
The README.1st file has a few, simple
Hi Fellas
Can anyone tell me why webalizer 1.30 is ignoring hugh amounts
of records in my apache log files ?
Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
Craig
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 10:51:43AM +0200, James wrote:
bug in 1.30 version, uodate to 2.0 is a solution or there is a patch
Yup. It ignores records after 20011004.
floating about...
Indeed. It's available on www.webalizer.org. Can't remember quite there.
Hassle with upgrading to 2.0 is
Hassle with upgrading to 2.0 is that, AFAIK, it'll trash your history for
that year (could be wrong...)
Actually, the repaired .deb package has made it to proposed updates in
stable and apt-get update, apt-get upgrade will install the fixed
package.
The README.1st file has a few, simple
Craig wrote:
Does anyone know how to get webalizer to
re-read all the apache log files ?
for a in /var/log/apache/access.log*; do webalizer $a; done
?
regards,
Remco.
--
:: Remco van de Meent
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:: http://remco.vandemeent.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 10:16:41AM +0200, Craig wrote:
Hi debian community
Does anyone know how to get webalizer to
re-read all the apache log files ?
Even the gunzipped ones ?
Remove the webalizer.current file and then specify all the logfiles,
one by one on the command line. Eg
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:30, Marcin Sochacki wrote:
Does anyone know how to get webalizer to
re-read all the apache log files ?
Even the gunzipped ones ?
Remove the webalizer.current file and then specify all the logfiles,
one by one on the command line. Eg.:
webalizer -c /etc
Remco van de Meent [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Somebody please test and report :) I still have no potato box around
for extensive testing, unfortunately.
I just installed it from proposed updates and it is running fine on my
potato box. But it I have not done extensive testing.
btw - thanks.
Hi debian community
Does anyone know how to get webalizer to
re-read all the apache log files ?
Even the gunzipped ones ?
..Craig
Craig wrote:
Does anyone know how to get webalizer to
re-read all the apache log files ?
for a in /var/log/apache/access.log*; do webalizer $a; done
?
regards,
Remco.
--
:: Remco van de Meent
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:: http://remco.vandemeent.net/
Remco van de Meent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somebody please test and report :) I still have no potato box around
for extensive testing, unfortunately.
I just installed it from proposed updates and it is running fine on my
potato box. But it I have not done extensive testing.
btw - thanks.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 10:16:41AM +0200, Craig wrote:
Hi debian community
Does anyone know how to get webalizer to
re-read all the apache log files ?
Even the gunzipped ones ?
Remove the webalizer.current file and then specify all the logfiles,
one by one on the command line. Eg
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:30, Marcin Sochacki wrote:
Does anyone know how to get webalizer to
re-read all the apache log files ?
Even the gunzipped ones ?
Remove the webalizer.current file and then specify all the logfiles,
one by one on the command line. Eg.:
webalizer -c /etc
Tilmann Holst wrote:
Remco van de Meent [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I'll make a new package available in the next few days and I'll put
it up for download on some debian.org machine. You won't find in
the potato archive however.
I just put them online: http://people.debian.org/~remco/
Tilmann Holst wrote:
Remco van de Meent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll make a new package available in the next few days and I'll put
it up for download on some debian.org machine. You won't find in
the potato archive however.
I just put them online: http://people.debian.org/~remco/
Remco van de Meent [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I'll make a new package available in the next few days and I'll put it
up for download on some debian.org machine. You won't find in the
potato archive however.
Is it possible to put it into proposed-updates?
--
Tilmann Holst - TUCCO - the
Remco van de Meent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll make a new package available in the next few days and I'll put it
up for download on some debian.org machine. You won't find in the
potato archive however.
Is it possible to put it into proposed-updates?
--
Tilmann Holst - TUCCO - the
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Marcel Hicking wrote:
Cameron Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8 Oct 2001, at 15:52:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 15:36]:
Cameron Moore wrote:
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04
(Linux 2.2.12) English. I have several websites
running on my
Matt Fair wrote:
Hello,
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
config file each half hour. On October 4th one
various people wrote:
[webalizer-1.30.4 from potato is badly broken, starting Oct 5, 2001]
[there is a fix from the upstream author]
I'll make a new package available in the next few days and I'll put it
up for download on some debian.org machine. You won't find in the
potato archive however
Matt Fair wrote:
Hello,
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
config file each half hour. On October 4th one
Cameron Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8 Oct 2001, at 15:52:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 15:36]:
Cameron Moore wrote:
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04
(Linux 2.2.12) English. I have several websites
running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix), each
site
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Marcel Hicking wrote:
Cameron Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8 Oct 2001, at 15:52:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 15:36]:
Cameron Moore wrote:
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04
(Linux 2.2.12) English. I have several websites
running on my
various people wrote:
[webalizer-1.30.4 from potato is badly broken, starting Oct 5, 2001]
[there is a fix from the upstream author]
I'll make a new package available in the next few days and I'll put it
up for download on some debian.org machine. You won't find in the
potato archive however
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 10:30:02PM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
Maybe someone can grab the sources for the webalizer package from
woody (i.e. webalizer version 2.01.6-something) and recompile it on
potato (don't know if it works out of the box), and see if that works?
Yep, I was quite
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 10:30:02PM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
Maybe someone can grab the sources for the webalizer package from
woody (i.e. webalizer version 2.01.6-something) and recompile it on
potato (don't know if it works out of the box), and see if that works?
Yep, I was quite
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Matt Fair wrote:
daily stats, nothing. Apache is still recording the transfer logs, and
Are the transfers really being recorded to
/var/log/apache/virtual/opensimpx/transfer.log?
26 records (26 ignored) in 0.00 seconds
This looks like it has 26 old entries but no new
Yes,
I did a tail -f /var/log/apache/virtual/opensimpx/transfer.log and I can
see traffic coming to the site.
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Matt Fair wrote:
daily stats, nothing. Apache is still recording the transfer logs, and
Are the transfers really being recorded to
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 13:44]:
Hello,
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
config file each half
Hello,
After looking this problem over some more, it seems it just ignores
changes, I removed the webalizer.current file, re-ran webalizer and it
got todays stats, but when I put back my original webalizer.current file
an re-ran webalizer again it doesn't change anything, instead it ignores
At 03:15 PM 10/8/01 -0500, Cameron Moore wrote:
I'm seeing the exact same problem (same version of webalizer but newer
apache). Nothing was changed on the box -- it just stopped working.
Plenty of resources (disk, memory, etc). Seems like a webalizer bug.
First one to figure out the problem
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 01:01:16PM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
I am guessing that there is a config option to allow longer requests. (But
I don't see it in my manual page.)
I don't think so. I remember I had to patch it and recompile.
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 15:36]:
Cameron Moore wrote:
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12)
English. I have several websites running on my server using
Apache/1.3.9 (Unix), each site with its own config file. I have a
cron to run: webalizer -c
Take a look at your webalizer.current file. The second line will be
the date of the last record processed. Webalizer will not process any
files before that date to prevent duplication. I have manually changed
the date to process older log files with success.
Pete Billson
--
http
Hi.
A workaround is to change the epoch from 1/1/1990 to 1/1/2000 in the
webalizer.c sources and recompile. Credits go to Mait Vares.
Anyone know if the number of seconds from 1/1/1990 till 5/10/2001 is
something like 10^x or 2^y ? :-)
regards,
Remco.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hello,
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
config file each half hour. On October 4th one of my sites got about
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 01:32:59PM -0600, Matt Fair wrote:
Hello,
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
config
Hello,
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
config file each half hour. On October 4th one of my sites got about
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 01:32:59PM -0600, Matt Fair wrote:
Hello,
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
config
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Martin Man wrote:
since the beginning of september I'm sometimes getting something like
oversized request truncated from webalizer, though I haven't look at it
Same here. In my case, these were requests by the Code Red-type worm.
I am guessing that there is a config option
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Matt Fair wrote:
daily stats, nothing. Apache is still recording the transfer logs, and
Are the transfers really being recorded to
/var/log/apache/virtual/opensimpx/transfer.log?
26 records (26 ignored) in 0.00 seconds
This looks like it has 26 old entries but no new
Yes,
I did a tail -f /var/log/apache/virtual/opensimpx/transfer.log and I can
see traffic coming to the site.
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Matt Fair wrote:
daily stats, nothing. Apache is still recording the transfer logs, and
Are the transfers really being recorded to
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 13:44]:
Hello,
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
config file each half hour
Hello,
After looking this problem over some more, it seems it just ignores
changes, I removed the webalizer.current file, re-ran webalizer and it
got todays stats, but when I put back my original webalizer.current file
an re-ran webalizer again it doesn't change anything, instead it ignores
At 03:15 PM 10/8/01 -0500, Cameron Moore wrote:
I'm seeing the exact same problem (same version of webalizer but newer
apache). Nothing was changed on the box -- it just stopped working.
Plenty of resources (disk, memory, etc). Seems like a webalizer bug.
First one to figure out the problem
Cameron Moore wrote:
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12)
English. I have several websites running on my server using
Apache/1.3.9 (Unix), each site with its own config file. I have a
cron to run: webalizer -c config file each half hour. On October
4th one
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 01:01:16PM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
I am guessing that there is a config option to allow longer requests. (But
I don't see it in my manual page.)
I don't think so. I remember I had to patch it and recompile.
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 15:36]:
Cameron Moore wrote:
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12)
English. I have several websites running on my server using
Apache/1.3.9 (Unix), each site with its own config file. I have a
cron to run: webalizer -c config
Take a look at your webalizer.current file. The second line will be
the date of the last record processed. Webalizer will not process any
files before that date to prevent duplication. I have manually changed
the date to process older log files with success.
Pete Billson
--
http
Hi.
A workaround is to change the epoch from 1/1/1990 to 1/1/2000 in the
webalizer.c sources and recompile. Credits go to Mait Vares.
Anyone know if the number of seconds from 1/1/1990 till 5/10/2001 is
something like 10^x or 2^y ? :-)
regards,
Remco.
that will persuade me to roll my own before
= v2.01 makes it into testing?)
I'm hoping it will help me...my webalizer gets an error about strings being too long.
Rob...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:24, Craig wrote:
Hey debian community
I have just install webalizer 1.30 on my web server box
so our web designers can analyze traffic to and from
their websites. I have a combined log for all our sites
but it doesn't look like webalizer is giving a statistical
it into testing?)
I reckon: http://mrunix.net/webalizer/news.html :)
- Jeff
--
You know, the crunchy, folk-singer part of me wants to believe that a
performance is a dialogue, but I can't hear a fucking thing you're
saying. - Ani DiFranco
Hi,
One method I used was to use a different config file for each vitual host
I had on the box. Each vitual host has a different log file too.
Cheers,
Rob
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Craig wrote:
Hey debian community
I have just install webalizer 1.30 on my web server box
so our web designers
At 08:23 28/08/01 +0100, Rob Woodward wrote:
Hi,
One method I used was to use a different config file for each vitual host
I had on the box. Each vitual host has a different log file too.
My 2 cents :
for arf in `find /opt/web/web2/home/*/logs/access_log`
do
$WEBALIZER -o /tmp -Q -N
Hi all
Could you let me know where I can download the webalizer on the internet?
Tks
Regards
Peter
Rob Woodward wrote:
Hi,
One method I used was to use a different config file for each vitual host
I had on the box. Each vitual host has a different log file too.
Cheers,
Rob
On Tue
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Jean Baptiste Lallement wrote:
I'm feeling lucky with query webalizer on google.com gave me
http://www.mrunix.net/webalizer/
So what's wrong with : apt-get install webalizer then?
--
Martin Wheeler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
PROTECTED]; Craig
Subject: Re: Webalizer
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Jean Baptiste Lallement wrote:
I'm feeling lucky with query webalizer on google.com gave me
http://www.mrunix.net/webalizer/
So what's wrong with : apt-get install webalizer then?
--
Martin Wheeler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Craig wrote:
Nothing, thats what i used, only thing is its version 1.30
whereas if you download the source its 2.01
You could also download the source from testing... in my box I've compiled it and it
is 2.1.6.
Just my $2 cents.
--
:wq
--
Sellaro
S Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2001 00:29
An: z-deb-isp
Betreff: RE: Webalizer and net-acct differences
The header size is not so fixed, actually. If you use cookies on your site
the client will send them to you upon each request. You might have CGIs
On Tuesday 08 May 2001 17:41, Andreas Rabus wrote:
Not only will it not report the size of the http headers, but it won't
report
the TCP and IP frame information and any ICMP messages that may be
required.
What is the problem with automatically sucking the sizes out of webalizer
files
Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2001 00:29
An: z-deb-isp
Betreff: RE: Webalizer and net-acct differences
The header size is not so fixed, actually. If you use cookies on your site
the client will send them to you upon each request. You might have CGIs
Back to questioning:
recently i did some calculation and find out that webalizer results are
about about 85% of the net-acct results.
Ist that an realistic overhead form http-headers, ICMP (on or to port 80?),
and TCP/IP frame info, etc.?
Yes. But it depends upon the kind of data served
and
not what webalizer/etc reports, you and your customer should both understand
the differences.
- jsw
-Original Message-
From: Nicolas Bougues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Nicolas Bougues
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:56 PM
To: Andreas Rabus
Cc: 'Russell Coker'; Debian ISP List (E
is the problem with automatically sucking the sizes out of webalizer
files and reporting them in some other format?
--
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am
hi,
Not only will it not report the size of the http headers, but it won't
report
the TCP and IP frame information and any ICMP messages that may be
required.
What is the problem with automatically sucking the sizes out of webalizer
files and reporting them in some other format?
the answer
Back to questioning:
recently i did some calculation and find out that webalizer results are
about about 85% of the net-acct results.
Ist that an realistic overhead form http-headers, ICMP (on or to port 80?),
and TCP/IP frame info, etc.?
Yes. But it depends upon the kind of data served
and
not what webalizer/etc reports, you and your customer should both understand
the differences.
- jsw
-Original Message-
From: Nicolas Bougues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Nicolas Bougues
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:56 PM
To: Andreas Rabus
Cc: 'Russell Coker'; Debian ISP List (E
hi,
for our accounting i tried to write a script that uses net-acct (an
user-space daemon to log all network traffic over an net-device) to collect
the webtraffic for our customer.
Until now we use webalizer and read the monthly sums in his report, but that
is'nt a nice job, so i tried
Anbody knows what is loggend in the Apache log in the field size (i.e.
included HTTP Header or not) , and what does net-acct take for the size of a
packet (just the payload, or the headers too?)
From the Apache docs @
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_log_common.html
bytes
The number of
hi,
for our accounting i tried to write a script that uses net-acct (an
user-space daemon to log all network traffic over an net-device) to collect
the webtraffic for our customer.
Until now we use webalizer and read the monthly sums in his report, but that
is'nt a nice job, so i tried
Anbody knows what is loggend in the Apache log in the field size (i.e.
included HTTP Header or not) , and what does net-acct take for the size of a
packet (just the payload, or the headers too?)
From the Apache docs @
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_log_common.html
bytes
The number of
86 matches
Mail list logo
